From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ard Biesheuvel Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] efi: Move the x86 secure boot switch to generic code Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 07:04:21 -0700 Message-ID: References: <149148299794.3427.549144000807596903.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <23673.1495634085@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <23673.1495634085-S6HVgzuS8uM4Awkfq6JHfwNdhmdF6hFW@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-efi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: David Howells Cc: Matthew Garrett , linux-security-module , "linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org On 24 May 2017 at 06:54, David Howells wrote: > Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > >> > + UEFI Secure Boot provides a mechanism for ensuring that the firmware >> > + will only load signed bootloaders and kernels. Secure boot mode may >> > + be determined from EFI variables provided by the BIOS if not >> >> Please replace 'the BIOS' with something more generic. > > "Firmware" or "System firmware" maybe? > Either is fine by me