linux-efi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
To: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
Cc: "Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
	linux-efi <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Linux Doc Mailing List" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"François Ozog" <francois.ozog@linaro.org>,
	"Ilias Apalodimas" <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] docs: admin-guide: fdt and initrd load in EFI stub
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2020 21:21:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMj1kXGBGb5yU0XH3oBJfTUDiFzhqa8ihyYo=n_qyj1VcCs5zA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9899cc58-c856-38ca-3a89-4b545c973a4f@gmx.de>

On Fri, 2 Oct 2020 at 21:14, Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> On 10/2/20 7:21 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > Hi Heinrich,
> >
> > Thanks for documenting this.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 2 Oct 2020 at 19:11, Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> wrote:
> >>
> >> Describe how a device tree and an initial RAM disk can be passed to the EFI
> >> Boot Stub.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
> >> ---
> >>  Documentation/admin-guide/efi-stub.rst | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/efi-stub.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/efi-stub.rst
> >> index 833edb0d0bc4..86f50a33884c 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/efi-stub.rst
> >> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/efi-stub.rst
> >> @@ -38,6 +38,34 @@ arch/arm/boot/zImage should be copied to the system partition, and it
> >>  may not need to be renamed. Similarly for arm64, arch/arm64/boot/Image
> >>  should be copied but not necessarily renamed.
> >>
> >> +Passing an initial RAM disk to the EFI Boot Stub
> >> +------------------------------------------------
> >> +
> >> +The following means sorted by decreasing priority can be used to provide an
> >> +initial RAM disk to the EFI Boot Stub:
> >> +
> >> +* The firmware may provide a UEFI Load File 2 Protocol. The stub will try to
> >> +  load the RAM disk by calling the LoadFile() service of the protocol using
> >> +  a vendor device path with the vendor GUID
> >> +  5568e427-0x68fc-4f3d-ac74-ca555231cc68.
> >> +* Next the EFI stub will try to load the file indicated by the "initrd=" command
> >> +  line parameter.
> >> +* The prior boot stage may pass the location of the initial RAM disk via the
> >> +  "linux,initrd-start" and "linux,initrd-end" properties of the "/chosen" node
> >> +  of the device-tree.
> >> +
> >
> > On x86, the boot_params struct is used to pass the address and size of
> > the initrd in memory. Maybe include that for completeness?
>
> On x86 boot_params is set in function efi_pe_entry() after loading the
> file indicated by the initrd= command line.
>
> boot_params is not accessible by a caller of the EFI stub but is a
> structure used at the interface between EFI stub and main kernel. This
> interface is not in the scope of the admin-guide.
>

 I don't see the difference between dt for arm and boot_params for
x86. Both can be provided by the bootloader, and will be created from
scratch by the efi stub if not. They both carry the command line and
address and size of the initrd, and the efi stub will load  the initrd
and update this Information, or pass it on unmodified if the
bootloader already loaded the initrd into memory.



> The main Linux entry point is already described in
> Documentation/x86/boot.rst and ./Documentation/x86/zero-page.rst.
>
> We can add Sphinx style documentation for function efi_pe_entry()
> mentioning that it fills in boot_params.
> drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/x86-stub.c then can be added to
> Documentation/driver-api/firmware/efi/index.rst in an x86 chapter. But
> these will be separate patches.
>
> Best regards
>
> Heinrich
>
> >
> >> +The first two items are inhibited by the "noinitrd" command line parameter.
> >> +
> >
> > Interesting. Are you saying noinitrd is ignored by the kernel itself?
> >
> > Looking at the code, it might only work for preventing the load of old
> > style initrd ramdisks, whereas initramfs images are handled
> > separately.
> >
> > This is something that we should probably fix one way or the other.
> >
> >
> >> +Passing a device-tree to the EFI Boot Stub
> >> +------------------------------------------
> >> +
> >> +A device-tree can be passed to the EFI Boot Stub in decreasing priority using
> >> +
> >> +* command line option dtb=
> >> +* a UEFI configuration table with GUID b1b621d5-f19c-41a5-830b-d9152c69aae0.
> >> +
> >> +The command line option is only available if CONFIG_EFI_ARMSTUB_DTB_LOADER=y
> >> +and secure boot is disabled.
> >>
> >>  Passing kernel parameters from the EFI shell
> >>  --------------------------------------------
> >> @@ -46,6 +74,10 @@ Arguments to the kernel can be passed after bzImage.efi, e.g.::
> >>
> >>         fs0:> bzImage.efi console=ttyS0 root=/dev/sda4
> >>
> >> +The "noinitrd" option
> >> +---------------------
> >> +
> >> +The "noinitrd" option stops the EFI stub from loading an initial RAM disk.
> >>
> >>  The "initrd=" option
> >>  --------------------
> >> @@ -98,3 +130,6 @@ CONFIGURATION TABLE.
> >>
> >>  "dtb=" is processed in the same manner as the "initrd=" option that is
> >>  described above.
> >> +
> >> +This option is only available if CONFIG_EFI_ARMSTUB_DTB_LOADER=y and secure
> >> +boot is disabled.
> >> --
> >> 2.28.0
> >>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-02 19:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-02 17:11 [PATCH 1/1] docs: admin-guide: fdt and initrd load in EFI stub Heinrich Schuchardt
2020-10-02 17:21 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-10-02 17:50   ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2020-10-02 19:14   ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2020-10-02 19:21     ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2020-10-02 20:04       ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2020-10-02 23:26         ` Atish Patra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAMj1kXGBGb5yU0XH3oBJfTUDiFzhqa8ihyYo=n_qyj1VcCs5zA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=francois.ozog@linaro.org \
    --cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xypron.glpk@gmx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).