Linux-EFI Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Vishal L Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-efi <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 03/10] x86, efi: Push EFI_MEMMAP check into leaf routines
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 05:32:41 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4jRR1aYta9bNSBKqq4Hf+CQPW9UmpkEfqxJMui129JQjQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu_6zkq0cfp715sn-boGD=ZVDJ-Xk7venkQb1Gry_hxoeg@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 2:06 AM Ard Biesheuvel
<ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 at 03:06, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > In preparation for adding another EFI_MEMMAP dependent call that needs
> > to occur before e820__memblock_setup() fixup the existing efi calls to
> > check for EFI_MEMMAP internally. This ends up being cleaner than the
> > alternative of checking EFI_MEMMAP multiple times in setup_arch().
> >
> > Cc: <x86@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> > Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
> > Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
>
> I'd prefer it if the spurious whitespace changes could be dropped, but
> otherwise, this looks fine to me, so I am not going to obsess about
> it.

Fair point, I'll drop those when I resubmit after -rc1.

> Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>

Thanks!

  reply index

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-30  1:52 [PATCH v5 00/10] EFI Specific Purpose Memory Support Dan Williams
2019-08-30  1:52 ` [PATCH v5 01/10] acpi/numa: Establish a new drivers/acpi/numa/ directory Dan Williams
2019-08-30  1:52 ` [PATCH v5 02/10] efi: Enumerate EFI_MEMORY_SP Dan Williams
2019-08-30  1:52 ` [PATCH v5 03/10] x86, efi: Push EFI_MEMMAP check into leaf routines Dan Williams
2019-09-13  9:05   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-09-13 12:32     ` Dan Williams [this message]
2019-08-30  1:52 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] x86, efi: Reserve UEFI 2.8 Specific Purpose Memory for dax Dan Williams
2019-09-13 12:59   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-09-13 16:22     ` Dan Williams
2019-09-13 16:28       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-09-13 16:39         ` Dan Williams
2019-09-13 17:39           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-09-13 17:54             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-08-30  1:52 ` [PATCH v5 05/10] x86, efi: Add efi_fake_mem support for EFI_MEMORY_SP Dan Williams
2019-09-10  6:48   ` Ingo Molnar
2019-09-13 13:02   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-09-13 15:02     ` Dan Williams
2019-09-13 19:48   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-09-13 20:43     ` Dan Williams
2019-08-30  1:52 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] lib: Uplevel the pmem "region" ida to a global allocator Dan Williams
2019-08-30  1:52 ` [PATCH v5 07/10] dax: Fix alloc_dax_region() compile warning Dan Williams
2019-08-30  1:53 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] device-dax: Add a driver for "hmem" devices Dan Williams
2019-08-30  1:53 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] acpi/numa/hmat: Register HMAT at device_initcall level Dan Williams
2019-08-30  1:53 ` [PATCH v5 10/10] acpi/numa/hmat: Register "soft reserved" memory as an "hmem" device Dan Williams
2019-09-02 11:09 ` [PATCH v5 00/10] EFI Specific Purpose Memory Support Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-09-04 23:06   ` Dan Williams
2019-09-06 11:37     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-03 15:43       ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAPcyv4jRR1aYta9bNSBKqq4Hf+CQPW9UmpkEfqxJMui129JQjQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux-EFI Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-efi/0 linux-efi/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-efi linux-efi/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-efi \
		linux-efi@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index linux-efi

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-efi


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git