From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FSL_HELO_FAKE, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E52EC636C8 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 22:09:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2776561019 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 22:09:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230410AbhGTV3H (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jul 2021 17:29:07 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33764 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231493AbhGTV3C (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jul 2021 17:29:02 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x431.google.com (mail-pf1-x431.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::431]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B06EEC0613DD for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 15:09:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x431.google.com with SMTP id j199so696538pfd.7 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 15:09:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=g1KpDtcbagCdJ8ZcB9ERipK82kYWQJWAaZ7siOAOkMw=; b=iC5/q3Dl6pQ0rDuXXIFsUAbTTQ6Y1iAmt2YRVwiDFilqazfKQ9eEEPIayC2+XoUaT9 usur5pgbsW0fNlZwnXjGODqmC21M5aICjnd0qHR+a8GO8IcdohO4/jlCmYaIlbW9IpQ/ 9icYBfvLFjmRAGsIv2RA8ekw4kWlpmiVwY66u3OydYL7Z53+N5wZpVGiQAecWFBlLpLe sL9R9oq4gKRFUvlIZCwk423cdnRZmAN89qaHYNxWqXrQ1h70ThRegG+2GEW+VV4D7E6W We1DWyHavLAYbXFybe4gmSLh43r2YhL50quM4zqfHfvjJeqPygE3Sbq/iA1L8bSDsgIo MW0w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=g1KpDtcbagCdJ8ZcB9ERipK82kYWQJWAaZ7siOAOkMw=; b=rTGDcq63F2Sq25ItLd6QK88/eSKEqgDJ0qVRa5EC3wycTBz8qeIAzb5FKYv1b1w2Wm bjqBXGstm8K+2buw8FmBqbQ9qhMRnPVLPQZfYm0685jzicrZpTMpUJrJjWppV4zks6qz ZiCKlUBKfoYC344w5O83Q4TzqBz+P6Eei1Ou6g8EeRCSWokLgujAFEhy4dUrzS//jOhC OxrloDiRmw6/TnYUOXvl1TBjj+trCdVVv2CoVlH3XaCDmNShLn1liOityQ9Dlv/qk+Lb kZSohWPWoZad2zvpikIJXFhBL8+A0PfJvSGcYaPvyK462m6bUe8HDMr3fesmZrqwaQNn 2FWQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531DYIbYmhgcgIsDMa6qcaJJHVNDSxS8u2C+1WU2WPX6/wJBISDR HfGzOqUvSkNGvtaDpuvCc9quSA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx8WtrWjs7nIJb96K+K/6fJyf4kxrPOkag79GDpR0/USJYJ5ph8uncx7oovExjawasHg85EEw== X-Received: by 2002:a63:5059:: with SMTP id q25mr32834341pgl.9.1626818972887; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 15:09:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com (157.214.185.35.bc.googleusercontent.com. [35.185.214.157]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p5sm24369675pfn.46.2021.07.20.15.09.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 20 Jul 2021 15:09:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 22:09:28 +0000 From: Sean Christopherson To: Brijesh Singh Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Joerg Roedel , Tom Lendacky , "H. Peter Anvin" , Ard Biesheuvel , Paolo Bonzini , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson , Andy Lutomirski , Dave Hansen , Sergio Lopez , Peter Gonda , Peter Zijlstra , Srinivas Pandruvada , David Rientjes , Dov Murik , Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum , Borislav Petkov , Michael Roth , Vlastimil Babka , tony.luck@intel.com, npmccallum@redhat.com, brijesh.ksingh@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 38/40] KVM: SVM: Provide support for SNP_GUEST_REQUEST NAE event Message-ID: References: <20210707183616.5620-1-brijesh.singh@amd.com> <20210707183616.5620-39-brijesh.singh@amd.com> <68ea014c-51bc-6ed4-a77e-dd7ce1a09aaf@amd.com> <0641fdec-48a0-b3b7-9926-3ce5a6e53eb0@amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0641fdec-48a0-b3b7-9926-3ce5a6e53eb0@amd.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 20, 2021, Brijesh Singh wrote: > > On 7/20/21 11:28 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > Out of curiosity, why 4 VMPCKs? It seems completely arbitrary. > > > > I believe the thought process was by providing 4 keys it can provide > flexibility for each VMPL levels to use a different keys (if they wish). The > firmware does not care about the vmpl level during the guest request > handling, it just want to know which key is used for encrypting the payload > so that he can decrypt and provide the response for it. Ah, I forgot about VMPLs. That makes sense. Thanks!