linux-efi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>,
	Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/sme: Explicitly map new EFI memmap table as encrypted
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 10:11:41 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c997e8a2-b364-2a8e-d247-438e9d937a1e@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8afff0c64feb6b96db36112cb865243f4ae280ca.1634922135.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com>

On 10/22/21 12:02 PM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> Reserving memory using efi_mem_reserve() calls into the x86
> efi_arch_mem_reserve() function. This function will insert a new EFI
> memory descriptor into the EFI memory map representing the area of
> memory to be reserved and marking it as EFI runtime memory.
> 
> As part of adding this new entry, a new EFI memory map is allocated and
> mapped. The mapping is where a problem can occur. This new EFI memory map
> is mapped using early_memremap(). If the allocated memory comes from an
> area that is marked as EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_DATA memory in the current EFI
> memory map, then it will be mapped unencrypted (see memremap_is_efi_data()
> and the call to efi_mem_type()).
> 
> However, during replacement of the old EFI memory map with the new EFI
> memory map, efi_mem_type() is disabled, resulting in the new EFI memory
> map always being mapped encrypted in efi.memmap. This will cause a kernel
> crash later in the boot.
> 
> Since it is known that the new EFI memory map will always be mapped
> encrypted when efi_memmap_install() is called, explicitly map the new EFI
> memory map as encrypted (using early_memremap_prot()) when inserting the
> new memory map entry.
> 
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.14.x
> Fixes: 8f716c9b5feb ("x86/mm: Add support to access boot related data in the clear")
> Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>

Ard, are you going to take this through the EFI tree or does it need to go 
through another tree?

Thanks,
Tom

> 
> ---
> Changes for v2:
> - Update/expand commit message to (hopefully) make it easier to read and
>    understand
> - Add a comment around the use of the early_memremap_prot() call
> ---
>   arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
>   1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
> index b15ebfe40a73..14f8f20d727a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
> @@ -277,7 +277,19 @@ void __init efi_arch_mem_reserve(phys_addr_t addr, u64 size)
>   		return;
>   	}
>   
> -	new = early_memremap(data.phys_map, data.size);
> +	/*
> +	 * When SME is active, early_memremap() can map the memory unencrypted
> +	 * if the allocation came from EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_DATA (see
> +	 * memremap_is_efi_data() and the call to efi_mem_type()). However,
> +	 * when efi_memmap_install() is called to replace the memory map,
> +	 * efi_mem_type() is "disabled" and so the memory will always be mapped
> +	 * encrypted. To avoid this possible mismatch between the mappings,
> +	 * always map the newly allocated memmap memory as encrypted.
> +	 *
> +	 * When SME is not active, this behaves just like early_memremap().
> +	 */
> +	new = early_memremap_prot(data.phys_map, data.size,
> +				  pgprot_val(pgprot_encrypted(FIXMAP_PAGE_NORMAL)));
>   	if (!new) {
>   		pr_err("Failed to map new boot services memmap\n");
>   		return;
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-27 15:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-22 17:02 [PATCH v2] x86/sme: Explicitly map new EFI memmap table as encrypted Tom Lendacky
2021-10-27 15:11 ` Tom Lendacky [this message]
2021-10-27 15:14   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-10-27 16:56     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-10-27 16:59       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-10-27 17:04         ` Tom Lendacky
2021-12-01 14:05           ` Tom Lendacky
2021-12-03 10:30             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-12-03 16:22               ` Tom Lendacky
2021-12-03 18:13                 ` Ard Biesheuvel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c997e8a2-b364-2a8e-d247-438e9d937a1e@amd.com \
    --to=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=andy@infradead.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).