From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27C1CC77B7A for ; Fri, 19 May 2023 08:49:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4QN0rN2ytKz3f40 for ; Fri, 19 May 2023 18:49:08 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=GQOJc/91; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=L1COC9mD; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com (client-ip=170.10.133.124; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com; envelope-from=dhowells@redhat.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=GQOJc/91; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=L1COC9mD; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4QN0rF1ckDz3f40 for ; Fri, 19 May 2023 18:48:59 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1684486135; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=NFfz1Qefawb0lyg57CVn7ptvHTdohZyit/vKaHZw8LE=; b=GQOJc/91WIiP2p5sn6uHG6wy0zEY35fAuX26arFBIe5Gn071/G/cbljjV4Xi4LmF9vuEva +zA5PX6S7Y3oyn2B6VqZ5Okk5rNRTTI6/mRire0aq9k1ugi1e3c4X5dOen7noTJFHOaEbV fo+/Di+5Dbvp2BxwZelRxK6isgN8Zqo= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1684486136; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=NFfz1Qefawb0lyg57CVn7ptvHTdohZyit/vKaHZw8LE=; b=L1COC9mDC5DFcm0UpxucwzslltiIs8rvCD1RZzAm5CW3fDtkQIkQNHchElmXpk4d6F7ucB psVbA20hZ4NpYpvWvFgjsKwh60HCSOEYWJEOLyYri1e1wg+e1DMf76sQRYHojAgUokDIQ0 b9ndlG9P4koftDxEurS0LNJn6Y4LNDI= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-176-PtzYX2HQN1GxCR941SWFpg-1; Fri, 19 May 2023 04:48:51 -0400 X-MC-Unique: PtzYX2HQN1GxCR941SWFpg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 485DC80120A; Fri, 19 May 2023 08:48:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from warthog.procyon.org.uk (unknown [10.42.28.221]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E8842026D49; Fri, 19 May 2023 08:48:47 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: References: <20230519074047.1739879-1-dhowells@redhat.com> <20230519074047.1739879-6-dhowells@redhat.com> To: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH v20 05/32] splice: Make splice from a DAX file use direct_splice_read() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1742242.1684486127.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Fri, 19 May 2023 09:48:47 +0100 Message-ID: <1742243.1684486127@warthog.procyon.org.uk> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.4 X-BeenThere: linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Linux EROFS file system List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Jens Axboe , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Hillf Danton , Jan Kara , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, David Hildenbrand , linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, Linus Torvalds , Jeff Layton , Christian Brauner , Matthew Wilcox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, Al Viro , Jason Gunthorpe , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Logan Gunthorpe , Christoph Hellwig Errors-To: linux-erofs-bounces+linux-erofs=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linux-erofs" Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 08:40:20AM +0100, David Howells wrote: > > +#ifdef CONFIG_FS_DAX > > + if (IS_DAX(in->f_mapping->host)) > > No need for the ifdef. IS_DAX is compile-time false if CONFIG_FS_DAX > is not set. Ah - it's not that IS_DAX() is conditionalised, it's that S_DAX is. There's a bunch of places that use CONFIG_FS_DAX blocks, but I guess that's because they include calls to functions that are conditionalised out. I wonder if the dax_iomap_rw() declaration in the header can have a non-DAX fallback that returns an error and then we can get rid of some of the other conditionalisation. David