From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: hsiangkao@aol.com (Gao Xiang) Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2019 06:07:07 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] erofs: move erofs out of staging In-Reply-To: <1746679415.68815.1566076790942.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> References: <20190817082313.21040-1-hsiangkao@aol.com> <1746679415.68815.1566076790942.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> Message-ID: <20190817220706.GA11443@hsiangkao-HP-ZHAN-66-Pro-G1> Hi Richard, On Sat, Aug 17, 2019@11:19:50PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: > ----- Urspr?ngliche Mail ----- > > Von: "Gao Xiang" > > An: "Greg Kroah-Hartman" , "Al Viro" , "linux-fsdevel" > > , devel at driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-erofs at lists.ozlabs.org, "linux-kernel" > > > > CC: "Andrew Morton" , "Stephen Rothwell" , "tytso" , > > "Pavel Machek" , "David Sterba" , "Amir Goldstein" , "Christoph > > Hellwig" , "Darrick J . Wong" , "Dave Chinner" , > > "Jaegeuk Kim" , "Jan Kara" , "richard" , "torvalds" > > , "Chao Yu" , "Miao Xie" , "Li Guifu" > > , "Fang Wei" , "Gao Xiang" > > Gesendet: Samstag, 17. August 2019 10:23:13 > > Betreff: [PATCH] erofs: move erofs out of staging > > > EROFS filesystem has been merged into linux-staging for a year. > > > > EROFS is designed to be a better solution of saving extra storage > > space with guaranteed end-to-end performance for read-only files > > with the help of reduced metadata, fixed-sized output compression > > and decompression inplace technologies. > > How does erofs compare to squashfs? > IIUC it is designed to be faster. Do you have numbers? > Feel free to point me older mails if you already showed numbers, > I have to admit I didn't follow the development very closely. You can see the following related material which has microbenchmark tested on my laptop: https://static.sched.com/hosted_files/kccncosschn19eng/19/EROFS%20file%20system_OSS2019_Final.pdf which was mentioned in the related topic as well: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190815044155.88483-1-gaoxiang25 at huawei.com/ Thanks, Gao Xiang > > Thanks, > //richard