From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D0FFC3A59F for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 15:01:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E2192339E for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 15:01:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=oracle.com header.i=@oracle.com header.b="ay+58NQA" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7E2192339E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=oracle.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-erofs-bounces+linux-erofs=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46K5RH6pzLzDsDx for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 01:01:31 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=oracle.com (client-ip=156.151.31.86; helo=userp2130.oracle.com; envelope-from=dan.carpenter@oracle.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=oracle.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=oracle.com header.i=@oracle.com header.b="ay+58NQA"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from userp2130.oracle.com (userp2130.oracle.com [156.151.31.86]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46K5Qg3hs2zDrgG for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 01:00:55 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (userp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x7TEsdQQ152875; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 15:00:39 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=date : from : to : cc : subject : message-id : references : mime-version : content-type : in-reply-to; s=corp-2019-08-05; bh=rEPWuWUZ3FXXjNNG73REC4YN3YpRpdICbwGFOhGEwdY=; b=ay+58NQA9Tn6f6p8w5En8T8GLyxHaPxMv3mq++8aStebGvDFw5dAwKX7ewmzf5lbHiMT 6Ggd0a6Ak/2DZlFDxLbuFUvDqkM08CyU9f5Q/QDjjHBjLHLdVlaOQEmYYSFsErEyDZSG 0jPK9VZBD8fmvnAjNCF9em6eXHaYkx5cVNkzMpfiYBn2y50YQ1OqdtXxKM916Jqhykhx 9nJos3E5m30tuEmqlZvSrLaif9/eU7bIOQvlLahvNdmQnbGefPtdj0Nptj0ygsZOd5pE OdDDCIEOuNAhbe9P/zWIw+oJMEAj+hxO2KKAoYgxua30ReCSMnn8++DkjOeR1GcVUKyT 5g== Received: from aserp3020.oracle.com (aserp3020.oracle.com [141.146.126.70]) by userp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2upgr7853g-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 29 Aug 2019 15:00:39 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (aserp3020.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp3020.oracle.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x7TEr39P169824; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 15:00:38 GMT Received: from aserv0121.oracle.com (aserv0121.oracle.com [141.146.126.235]) by aserp3020.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2upc8ut25y-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 29 Aug 2019 15:00:38 +0000 Received: from abhmp0010.oracle.com (abhmp0010.oracle.com [141.146.116.16]) by aserv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id x7TF0Vlt022355; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 15:00:32 GMT Received: from kadam (/41.57.98.10) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 08:00:31 -0700 Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 18:00:23 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter To: Gao Xiang Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: erofs: using switch-case while checking the inode type. Message-ID: <20190829150023.GH23584@kadam> References: <20190829130813.11721-1-pratikshinde320@gmail.com> <20190829135607.GA195010@architecture4> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190829135607.GA195010@architecture4> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9363 signatures=668685 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1906280000 definitions=main-1908290163 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9363 signatures=668685 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1906280000 definitions=main-1908290163 X-BeenThere: linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Linux EROFS file system List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linux-erofs-bounces+linux-erofs=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linux-erofs" On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 09:56:07PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote: > Hi Pratik, > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 06:38:13PM +0530, Pratik Shinde wrote: > > while filling the linux inode, using switch-case statement to check > > the type of inode. > > switch-case statement looks more clean. > > > > Signed-off-by: Pratik Shinde > > No, that is not the case, see __ext4_iget() in fs/ext4/inode.c. Unnecessary complaining. > and could you write patches based on latest staging tree? > erofs is now in "fs/" rather than "drivers/staging". > and I will review it then. > > p.s. if someone argues here or there, there will be endless > issues since there is no standard at all. More complaining... It doesn't matter if you can find ext4 that looks like dog poop, that's irrelevant. regards, dan carpenter