Linux-EROFS Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Miao Xie <miaoxie@huawei.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	weidu.du@huawei.com, linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] erofs: some marcos are much more readable as a function
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 08:45:51 -0700
Message-ID: <20190830154551.GA11571@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5b2ecf5cec1a6aa3834e9af41886a7fcb18ae86a.camel@perches.com>

On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 08:16:27PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > -		sizeof(__u32) * ((__count) - 1); })
> > +static inline unsigned int erofs_xattr_ibody_size(__le16 d_icount)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned int icount = le16_to_cpu(d_icount);
> > +
> > +	if (!icount)
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	return sizeof(struct erofs_xattr_ibody_header) +
> > +		sizeof(__u32) * (icount - 1);
> 
> Maybe use struct_size()?

Declaring a variable that is only used for struct_size is rather ugly.
But while we are nitpicking: you don't need to byteswap to check for 0,
so the local variable could be avoided.

Also what is that magic -1 for?  Normally we use that for the
deprecated style where a variable size array is declared using
varname[1], but that doesn't seem to be the case for erofs.

  parent reply index

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-30  3:00 [PATCH v2 1/7] erofs: on-disk format should have explicitly assigned numbers Gao Xiang
2019-08-30  3:00 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] erofs: some marcos are much more readable as a function Gao Xiang
2019-08-30  3:16   ` Joe Perches
2019-08-30  3:20     ` Gao Xiang
2019-08-30  3:36       ` [PATCH v3 1/7] erofs: on-disk format should have explicitly assigned numbers Gao Xiang
2019-08-30  3:36         ` [PATCH v3 2/7] erofs: some macros are much more readable as a function Gao Xiang
2019-08-30  3:38           ` [PATCH v4 " Gao Xiang
2019-08-30  6:11           ` [PATCH v3 " Chao Yu
2019-08-30  3:36         ` [PATCH v3 3/7] erofs: use a better form for complicated on-disk fields Gao Xiang
2019-08-30  3:36         ` [PATCH v3 4/7] erofs: kill __packed for on-disk structures Gao Xiang
2019-08-30  6:16           ` Chao Yu
2019-08-30  3:36         ` [PATCH v3 5/7] erofs: kill erofs_{init,exit}_inode_cache Gao Xiang
2019-08-30  6:17           ` Chao Yu
2019-08-30  3:36         ` [PATCH v3 6/7] erofs: remove all likely/unlikely annotations Gao Xiang
2019-08-30  6:25           ` Chao Yu
2019-08-30  6:31             ` Gao Xiang
2019-08-30  6:43               ` Chao Yu
2019-08-30 11:55             ` Dan Carpenter
2019-08-30 11:30           ` Dan Carpenter
2019-08-30 12:06             ` Gao Xiang via Linux-erofs
2019-08-30 15:46           ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-30 16:04             ` Gao Xiang
2019-08-31 10:57               ` Dan Carpenter
2019-08-30  3:36         ` [PATCH v3 7/7] erofs: redundant assignment in __erofs_get_meta_page() Gao Xiang
2019-08-30  6:25           ` Chao Yu
2019-08-30 16:28           ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-30 16:48             ` Gao Xiang
2019-08-30 15:25         ` [PATCH v3 1/7] erofs: on-disk format should have explicitly assigned numbers Gao Xiang
2019-08-30 15:45     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2019-08-30 15:52       ` [PATCH v2 2/7] erofs: some marcos are much more readable as a function Gao Xiang
2019-08-30 15:56         ` Gao Xiang
2019-08-30  3:00 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] erofs: use a better form for complicated on-disk fields Gao Xiang
2019-08-30  3:29   ` Chao Yu
2019-08-30  3:00 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] erofs: kill __packed for on-disk structures Gao Xiang
2019-08-30  3:00 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] erofs: kill erofs_{init,exit}_inode_cache Gao Xiang
2019-08-30  3:00 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] erofs: remove all likely/unlikely annotations Gao Xiang
2019-08-30  3:00 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] erofs: reduntant assignment in __erofs_get_meta_page() Gao Xiang
2019-08-30  3:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] erofs: on-disk format should have explicitly assigned numbers Chao Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190830154551.GA11571@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miaoxie@huawei.com \
    --cc=weidu.du@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux-EROFS Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-erofs/0 linux-erofs/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-erofs linux-erofs/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-erofs \
		linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org linux-erofs@ozlabs.org
	public-inbox-index linux-erofs

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.ozlabs.lists.linux-erofs


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git