From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52D40C41514 for ; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 13:47:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAC07216C8 for ; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 13:47:58 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org DAC07216C8 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-erofs-bounces+linux-erofs=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46MWcX3RZ8zDqg7 for ; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 23:47:56 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com (client-ip=45.249.212.188; helo=huawei.com; envelope-from=gaoxiang25@huawei.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Received: from huawei.com (szxga02-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.188]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46MWQd5KG2zDqXX for ; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 23:39:20 +1000 (AEST) Received: from DGGEMM405-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.56]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 98EC5C1E173A35FF01AC; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 21:39:18 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggeme762-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.108) by DGGEMM405-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.20.213) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 21:39:18 +0800 Received: from architecture4 (10.140.130.215) by dggeme762-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.108) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1591.10; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 21:39:17 +0800 Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2019 21:38:26 +0800 From: Gao Xiang To: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/21] erofs: kill magic underscores Message-ID: <20190902133826.GB63268@architecture4> References: <20190802125347.166018-1-gaoxiang25@huawei.com> <20190901055130.30572-1-hsiangkao@aol.com> <20190901055130.30572-17-hsiangkao@aol.com> <20190902122627.GN15931@infradead.org> <20190902123937.GA17916@architecture4> <20190902125438.GA17750@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190902125438.GA17750@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-Originating-IP: [10.140.130.215] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggeme719-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.115) To dggeme762-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.108) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-BeenThere: linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Linux EROFS file system List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linux-erofs-bounces+linux-erofs=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linux-erofs" Hi Christoph, On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 05:54:38AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 08:39:37PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote: > > > > > > > + if (erofs_inode_version(advise) == EROFS_INODE_LAYOUT_V2) { > > > > > > I still need to wade through the old thread - but didn't you say this > > > wasn't really a new vs old version but a compat vs full inode? Maybe > > > the names aren't that suitable either? > > > > Could you kindly give some suggestions for better naming about it? > > there are all supported by EROFS... (Actually we only mainly use v1...) > > Maybe EROFS_INODE_LAYOUT_COMPACT and EROFS_INODE_LAYOUT_EXTENDED? Okay, that is fine. Thanks, Gao Xiang