From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A06DFC3A5A2 for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 02:11:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58E8D21897 for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 02:11:31 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 58E8D21897 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-erofs-bounces+linux-erofs=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46NS406Q6vzDqlD for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 12:11:28 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com (client-ip=45.249.212.35; helo=huawei.com; envelope-from=gaoxiang25@huawei.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Received: from huawei.com (szxga07-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46NS2n06mpzDqlr for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 12:10:24 +1000 (AEST) Received: from DGGEMS411-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 5B6A46BC7B4DED72A622; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 10:10:20 +0800 (CST) Received: from architecture4.huawei.com (10.140.130.215) by smtp.huawei.com (10.3.19.211) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 10:10:09 +0800 From: Gao Xiang To: Chao Yu , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Christoph Hellwig , Subject: [PATCH v2 05/25] erofs: update erofs_inode_is_data_compressed helper Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 10:08:52 +0800 Message-ID: <20190904020912.63925-6-gaoxiang25@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190904020912.63925-1-gaoxiang25@huawei.com> References: <20190901055130.30572-1-hsiangkao@aol.com> <20190904020912.63925-1-gaoxiang25@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [10.140.130.215] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-BeenThere: linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Linux EROFS file system List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Miao Xie , linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linux-erofs-bounces+linux-erofs=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linux-erofs" As Christoph said, "This looks like a really obsfucated way to write: return datamode == EROFS_INODE_FLAT_COMPRESSION || datamode == EROFS_INODE_FLAT_COMPRESSION_LEGACY; " Although I had my own consideration, it's the right way for now. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190829095954.GB20598@infradead.org/ Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang --- fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h b/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h index 59dcc2e8cb02..87d7ae82339a 100644 --- a/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h +++ b/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h @@ -62,9 +62,8 @@ enum { static inline bool erofs_inode_is_data_compressed(unsigned int datamode) { - if (datamode == EROFS_INODE_FLAT_COMPRESSION) - return true; - return datamode == EROFS_INODE_FLAT_COMPRESSION_LEGACY; + return datamode == EROFS_INODE_FLAT_COMPRESSION || + datamode == EROFS_INODE_FLAT_COMPRESSION_LEGACY; } /* bit definitions of inode i_advise */ -- 2.17.1