From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95BADC2D0C3 for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 06:49:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EFB4207E0 for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 06:49:59 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1EFB4207E0 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-erofs-bounces+linux-erofs=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47mSjK1djnzDqBH for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 17:49:57 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com (client-ip=45.249.212.187; helo=huawei.com; envelope-from=gaoxiang25@huawei.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Received: from huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47mSj80sCzzDq9W for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 17:49:43 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from DGGEMM404-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.54]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id E97086BCE13C5C4FAE81; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 14:49:35 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggeme762-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.108) by DGGEMM404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.20.212) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 14:49:33 +0800 Received: from architecture4 (10.160.196.180) by dggeme762-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.108) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 14:49:33 +0800 Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 14:49:11 +0800 From: Gao Xiang To: Pratik Shinde Subject: Re: [RFC] erofs-utils: on-disk extent format for blocks. Message-ID: <20191230064911.GA169899@architecture4> References: <20191227154348.21432-1-pratikshinde320@gmail.com> <20191229025546.GB2215@hsiangkao-HP-ZHAN-66-Pro-G1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-Originating-IP: [10.160.196.180] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggeme707-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.103) To dggeme762-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.108) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-BeenThere: linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Linux EROFS file system List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, miaoxie@huawei.com Errors-To: linux-erofs-bounces+linux-erofs=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linux-erofs" On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 11:49:55AM +0530, Pratik Shinde wrote: > Gao, > > Okay, I will rename the 'size' variables accordingly. > The 'S_SHIFT' gives the logical block number inside file. I am using it to > assign logical block no. > to extents. S_SHIFT is used to transfer between i_mode and filetype, see: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/fs/ext4/ext4.h#L3196 IMO, which is not the above meaning, how about using EROFS_BLKSIZ instead? Thanks, Gao Xiang > Also, I will modify the code to record only data extents. > > --Pratik. > > On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 8:26 AM Gao Xiang wrote: > > > Hi Pratik, > > > > On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 09:13:48PM +0530, Pratik Shinde wrote: > > > since this patch is quite different from previous patches I am treating > > > this as new patch. > > > > > > 1) On disk extent format for erofs data blocks. > > > 2) Detect holes inside files & skip allocation for hole blocks. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Pratik Shinde > > > --- > > > include/erofs/internal.h | 21 ++++++- > > > lib/inode.c | 155 > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ > > > 2 files changed, 156 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/include/erofs/internal.h b/include/erofs/internal.h > > > index e13adda..128aa63 100644 > > > --- a/include/erofs/internal.h > > > +++ b/include/erofs/internal.h > > > @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ struct erofs_sb_info { > > > extern struct erofs_sb_info sbi; > > > > > > struct erofs_inode { > > > - struct list_head i_hash, i_subdirs, i_xattrs; > > > + struct list_head i_hash, i_subdirs, i_xattrs, i_extents; > > > > > > unsigned int i_count; > > > struct erofs_inode *i_parent; > > > @@ -93,6 +93,7 @@ struct erofs_inode { > > > > > > unsigned int xattr_isize; > > > unsigned int extent_isize; > > > + unsigned int extent_meta_isize; > > > > maybe sparse_extent_isize is better... > > > > p.s. maybe we could send another patch rename extent_isize to > > compress_extent_isize or some better name... > > > > > > > > erofs_nid_t nid; > > > struct erofs_buffer_head *bh; > > > @@ -139,5 +140,23 @@ static inline const char *erofs_strerror(int err) > > > return msg; > > > } > > > > > > +#define HOLE_BLK -1 > > > +/* on disk extent format */ > > > +struct erofs_extent { > > > + __le32 ee_lblk; > > > + __le32 ee_pblk; > > > + __le32 ee_len; > > > +}; > > > + > > > +struct erofs_extent_node { > > > + struct list_head next; > > > + erofs_blk_t lblk; > > > + erofs_blk_t pblk; > > > + u32 len; > > > +}; > > > + > > > +struct erofs_inline_extent_header { > > > + u32 count; > > > +}; > > > #endif > > > > > > diff --git a/lib/inode.c b/lib/inode.c > > > index 0e19b11..a6af509 100644 > > > --- a/lib/inode.c > > > +++ b/lib/inode.c > > > @@ -38,6 +38,99 @@ static unsigned char erofs_type_by_mode[S_IFMT >> > > S_SHIFT] = { > > > > > > struct list_head inode_hashtable[NR_INODE_HASHTABLE]; > > > > > > + > > > +#define IS_HOLE(start, end) (roundup(start, EROFS_BLKSIZ) == start && > > \ > > > + roundup(end, EROFS_BLKSIZ) == end && \ > > > + (end - start) % EROFS_BLKSIZ == 0) > > > > See below.. > > > > > + > > > +/* returns the number of holes present in the file */ > > > +unsigned int erofs_read_extents(struct erofs_inode *inode, > > > + struct list_head *extents) > > > +{ > > > + int fd, st, en, dt; > > > + unsigned int nholes = 0; > > > + erofs_off_t data, hole, len, last_data; > > > + struct erofs_extent_node *e_hole, *e_data; > > > + > > > + fd = open(inode->i_srcpath, O_RDONLY); > > > + if (fd < 0) { > > > + return -errno; > > > + } > > > + len = lseek(fd, 0, SEEK_END); > > > + if (lseek(fd, 0, SEEK_SET) == -1) > > > + return -errno; > > > + data = 0; > > > + last_data = 0; > > > + while (data < len) { > > > + hole = lseek(fd, data, SEEK_HOLE); > > > + if (hole == len) > > > + break; > > > + data = lseek(fd, hole, SEEK_DATA); > > > + if (data < 0 || hole > data) { > > > + return -EINVAL; > > > + } > > > + if (IS_HOLE(hole, data)) { > > > + st = hole >> S_SHIFT; > > > + en = data >> S_SHIFT; > > > + dt = last_data >> S_SHIFT; > > > > Why using S_SHIFT here, some special meaning? > > > > > + last_data = data; > > > + e_data = malloc(sizeof(struct erofs_extent_node)); > > > + if (e_data == NULL) > > > + return -ENOMEM; > > > + e_data->lblk = dt; > > > + e_data->len = (st - dt); > > > + list_add_tail(&e_data->next, extents); > > > + e_hole = malloc(sizeof(struct erofs_extent_node)); > > > + if (e_hole == NULL) > > > + return -ENOMEM; > > > + e_hole->lblk = st; > > > + e_hole->pblk = HOLE_BLK; > > > + e_hole->len = (en - st); > > > + list_add_tail(&e_hole->next, extents); > > > + nholes += e_hole->len; > > > > Maybe we don't need to emit all HOLK extents since all data extents > > are with _length_... It is easy to detect all holes between extents... > > > > If some block doesn't belong to any extent, it's a hole. > > > > Thanks, > > Gao Xiang > > > > > + } > > > + } > > > + /* rounddown to exclude tail-end data */ > > > + if (last_data < len && (len - last_data) >= EROFS_BLKSIZ) { > > > + e_data = malloc(sizeof(struct erofs_extent_node)); > > > + if (e_data == NULL) > > > + return -ENOMEM; > > > + st = last_data >> S_SHIFT; > > > + e_data->lblk = st; > > > + e_data->len = rounddown((len - last_data), EROFS_BLKSIZ) > > >> S_SHIFT; > > > + list_add_tail(&e_data->next, extents); > > > + } > > > + return nholes; > > > +} > > > + > > > +char *erofs_create_extent_buffer(struct list_head *extents, unsigned > > int size) > > > +{ > > > + struct erofs_extent_node *e_node; > > > + struct erofs_inline_extent_header *header; > > > + char *buf; > > > + unsigned int p = 0; > > > + > > > + buf = malloc(size); > > > + if (buf == NULL) > > > + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); > > > + header = (struct erofs_inline_extent_header *) buf; > > > + header->count = 0; > > > + p += sizeof(struct erofs_inline_extent_header); > > > + list_for_each_entry(e_node, extents, next) { > > > + const struct erofs_extent ee = { > > > + .ee_lblk = cpu_to_le32(e_node->lblk), > > > + .ee_pblk = cpu_to_le32(e_node->pblk), > > > + .ee_len = cpu_to_le32(e_node->len) > > > + }; > > > + memcpy(buf + p, &ee, sizeof(struct erofs_extent)); > > > + p += sizeof(struct erofs_extent); > > > + header->count++; > > > + list_del(&e_node->next); > > > + free(e_node); > > > + } > > > + return buf; > > > +} > > > + > > > void erofs_inode_manager_init(void) > > > { > > > unsigned int i; > > > @@ -304,8 +397,9 @@ static bool erofs_file_is_compressible(struct > > erofs_inode *inode) > > > > > > int erofs_write_file(struct erofs_inode *inode) > > > { > > > - unsigned int nblocks, i; > > > + unsigned int nblocks, i, j, nholes; > > > int ret, fd; > > > + struct erofs_extent_node *e_node; > > > > > > if (!inode->i_size) { > > > inode->datalayout = EROFS_INODE_FLAT_PLAIN; > > > @@ -322,31 +416,43 @@ int erofs_write_file(struct erofs_inode *inode) > > > /* fallback to all data uncompressed */ > > > inode->datalayout = EROFS_INODE_FLAT_INLINE; > > > nblocks = inode->i_size / EROFS_BLKSIZ; > > > - > > > - ret = __allocate_inode_bh_data(inode, nblocks); > > > + nholes = erofs_read_extents(inode, &inode->i_extents); > > > + if (nholes < 0) > > > + return nholes; > > > + if (nblocks < 0) > > > + return nblocks; > > > + ret = __allocate_inode_bh_data(inode, nblocks - nholes); > > > if (ret) > > > return ret; > > > > > > fd = open(inode->i_srcpath, O_RDONLY | O_BINARY); > > > if (fd < 0) > > > return -errno; > > > - > > > - for (i = 0; i < nblocks; ++i) { > > > - char buf[EROFS_BLKSIZ]; > > > - > > > - ret = read(fd, buf, EROFS_BLKSIZ); > > > - if (ret != EROFS_BLKSIZ) { > > > - if (ret < 0) > > > - goto fail; > > > - close(fd); > > > - return -EAGAIN; > > > + i = inode->u.i_blkaddr; > > > + inode->extent_meta_isize = sizeof(struct > > erofs_inline_extent_header); > > > + list_for_each_entry(e_node, &inode->i_extents, next) { > > > + inode->extent_meta_isize += sizeof(struct erofs_extent); > > > + if (e_node->pblk == HOLE_BLK) { > > > + lseek(fd, e_node->len * EROFS_BLKSIZ, SEEK_CUR); > > > + continue; > > > } > > > + e_node->pblk = i; > > > + i += e_node->len; > > > + for (j = 0; j < e_node->len; j++) { > > > + char buf[EROFS_BLKSIZ]; > > > + ret = read(fd, buf, EROFS_BLKSIZ); > > > + if (ret != EROFS_BLKSIZ) { > > > + if (ret < 0) > > > + goto fail; > > > + close(fd); > > > + return -EAGAIN; > > > + } > > > + ret = blk_write(buf, e_node->pblk + j, 1); > > > + if (ret) > > > + goto fail; > > > > > > - ret = blk_write(buf, inode->u.i_blkaddr + i, 1); > > > - if (ret) > > > - goto fail; > > > + } > > > } > > > - > > > /* read the tail-end data */ > > > inode->idata_size = inode->i_size % EROFS_BLKSIZ; > > > if (inode->idata_size) { > > > @@ -479,8 +585,19 @@ static bool erofs_bh_flush_write_inode(struct > > erofs_buffer_head *bh) > > > if (ret) > > > return false; > > > free(inode->compressmeta); > > > + off += inode->extent_isize; > > > } > > > > > > + if (inode->extent_meta_isize) { > > > + char *extents = > > erofs_create_extent_buffer(&inode->i_extents, > > > + > > inode->extent_meta_isize); > > > + if (IS_ERR(extents)) > > > + return false; > > > + ret = dev_write(extents, off, inode->extent_meta_isize); > > > + free(extents); > > > + if (ret) > > > + return false; > > > + } > > > inode->bh = NULL; > > > erofs_iput(inode); > > > return erofs_bh_flush_generic_end(bh); > > > @@ -737,10 +854,11 @@ struct erofs_inode *erofs_new_inode(void) > > > > > > init_list_head(&inode->i_subdirs); > > > init_list_head(&inode->i_xattrs); > > > + init_list_head(&inode->i_extents); > > > > > > inode->idata_size = 0; > > > inode->xattr_isize = 0; > > > - inode->extent_isize = 0; > > > + inode->extent_meta_isize = 0; > > > > > > inode->bh = inode->bh_inline = inode->bh_data = NULL; > > > inode->idata = NULL; > > > @@ -961,4 +1079,3 @@ struct erofs_inode > > *erofs_mkfs_build_tree_from_path(struct erofs_inode *parent, > > > > > > return erofs_mkfs_build_tree(inode); > > > } > > > - > > > -- > > > 2.9.3 > > > > >