linux-erofs.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@gmx.com>
To: Li Guifu <bluce.lee@aliyun.com>
Cc: linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] erofs-utils: add a compress limit to source input stream
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 02:18:10 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200609181810.GA6992@hsiangkao-HP-ZHAN-66-Pro-G1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200609155009.11805-1-bluce.lee@aliyun.com>

Hi Guifu,

On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 11:50:09PM +0800, Li Guifu via Linux-erofs wrote:
> It cause a differential amplification when create binary diff
> image for upgrade. Give a limits to cut compress, so the amplification
> will be limit in the given size.

Try to write a better commit message... and if we limit that by introducing
segment compression (e.g. 4M segment size), we could have the following
benefits:
 - more friendly to block diff (and more details about this);
 - it can also be used for parallel compression in the same file.

>
> Signed-off-by: Li Guifu <bluce.lee@aliyun.com>
> ---
> changes since v1:
>  - fix variable "readcount" use the min data with comprlimits
>
>  include/erofs/internal.h |  1 +
>  lib/compress.c           | 22 +++++++++++++++++-----
>  2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/erofs/internal.h b/include/erofs/internal.h
> index 41da189..367c0b0 100644
> --- a/include/erofs/internal.h
> +++ b/include/erofs/internal.h
> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ typedef unsigned short umode_t;
>
>  #define EROFS_ISLOTBITS		5
>  #define EROFS_SLOTSIZE		(1U << EROFS_ISLOTBITS)
> +#define EROFS_COMPR_LIMITS	(1024U * EROFS_BLKSIZ)

Could we put it into cfg and add a new command line
argument for this? how about compress_segment_size?

>
>  typedef u64 erofs_off_t;
>  typedef u64 erofs_nid_t;
> diff --git a/lib/compress.c b/lib/compress.c
> index 6cc68ed..fe1cb09 100644
> --- a/lib/compress.c
> +++ b/lib/compress.c
> @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ static int vle_compress_one(struct erofs_inode *inode,
>  {
>  	struct erofs_compress *const h = &compresshandle;
>  	unsigned int len = ctx->tail - ctx->head;
> -	unsigned int count;
> +	unsigned int count = 0;
>  	int ret;
>  	static char dstbuf[EROFS_BLKSIZ * 2];
>  	char *const dst = dstbuf + EROFS_BLKSIZ;
> @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ static int vle_compress_one(struct erofs_inode *inode,
>  		bool raw;
>
>  		if (len <= EROFS_BLKSIZ) {
> -			if (final)
> +			if (!count || final)

I think you could avoid this trick by adding a counter in
z_erofs_vle_compress_ctx or whatever place...

>  				goto nocompression;
>  			break;
>  		}
> @@ -392,7 +392,7 @@ int erofs_write_compressed_file(struct erofs_inode *inode)
>  {
>  	struct erofs_buffer_head *bh;
>  	struct z_erofs_vle_compress_ctx ctx;
> -	erofs_off_t remaining;
> +	erofs_off_t remaining, comprlimits;
>  	erofs_blk_t blkaddr, compressed_blocks;
>  	unsigned int legacymetasize;
>  	int ret, fd;
> @@ -422,10 +422,14 @@ int erofs_write_compressed_file(struct erofs_inode *inode)
>  	ctx.head = ctx.tail = 0;
>  	ctx.clusterofs = 0;
>  	remaining = inode->i_size;
> +	comprlimits = EROFS_COMPR_LIMITS;
>
>  	while (remaining) {
> -		const u64 readcount = min_t(u64, remaining,
> -					    sizeof(ctx.queue) - ctx.tail);
> +		const u64 readcount = min_t(u64,
> +					     min_t(u64, remaining,
> +						sizeof(ctx.queue) - ctx.tail),
> +						comprlimits);
> +

We don't need to limit I/O... it would become ineffective
when such limits are small...

>
>  		ret = read(fd, ctx.queue + ctx.tail, readcount);
>  		if (ret != readcount) {
> @@ -434,11 +438,19 @@ int erofs_write_compressed_file(struct erofs_inode *inode)
>  		}
>  		remaining -= readcount;
>  		ctx.tail += readcount;
> +		comprlimits -= readcount;
>
> +compr_continue:
>  		/* do one compress round */
>  		ret = vle_compress_one(inode, &ctx, false);
>  		if (ret)
>  			goto err_bdrop;
> +		if (!comprlimits) {
> +			if (ctx.head != ctx.tail)
> +				goto compr_continue;
> +			ctx.clusterofs = 0;
> +			comprlimits = EROFS_COMPR_LIMITS;

this can be more clearer...

Thanks,
Gao Xiang

> +		}
>  	}
>
>  	/* do the final round */
> --
> 2.17.1
>

      reply	other threads:[~2020-06-09 18:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-09 15:50 [PATCH v2] erofs-utils: add a compress limit to source input stream Li Guifu via Linux-erofs
2020-06-09 18:18 ` Gao Xiang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200609181810.GA6992@hsiangkao-HP-ZHAN-66-Pro-G1 \
    --to=hsiangkao@gmx.com \
    --cc=bluce.lee@aliyun.com \
    --cc=linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).