linux-erofs.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: 胡玮文 <sehuww@mail.scut.edu.cn>
To: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] erofs-utils: fix battach on full buffer block
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 23:52:05 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210118155205.GA21706@DESKTOP-N4CECTO.huww98.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210118135916.GB2423918@xiangao.remote.csb>

Hi Xiang,

I would like to. If I understand it correctly, tests should based on
experimental-tests branch, and be submitted to this mail-list, too?

I wonder if we already have some CI service set up to run these tests
automatically? I saw a mail from Travis CI in the mail-list archive, but it
seems I don't have access to that organization.

On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 09:59:16PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
> Hi Weiwen,
> 
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 08:39:45PM +0800, Hu Weiwen wrote:
> > When __erofs_battach() is called on an buffer block of which
> > (bb->buffers.off % EROFS_BLKSIZ == 0), `tail_blkaddr' will not be
> > updated correctly. This bug can be reproduced by:
> > 
> > mkdir bug-repo
> > head -c 4032 /dev/urandom > bug-repo/1
> > head -c 4095 /dev/urandom > bug-repo/2
> > head -c 12345 /dev/urandom > bug-repo/3  # arbitrary size
> > mkfs.erofs -Eforce-inode-compact bug-repo.erofs.img bug-repo
> > 
> > Then mount this image and see that file `3' in the image is different
> > from `bug-repo/3'.
> > 
> > This patch fix this by:
> > 
> > * Don't inline tail-end data in this case, since the tail-end data will
> > be in a different block from inode.
> > * Correctly handle `battach' in this case.
> > 
> 
> I will evaluate this condition later, yet if you have some interest
> and extra time, could you also help on writing a regression testcase
> for this, so we can look after such regression in case of the future
> code changes?
> 
> This is also an ongoing work for the next erofs-utils release, see:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/xiang/erofs-utils.git/
> 
> Thanks,
> Gao Xiang


  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-18 15:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-18 12:39 Hu Weiwen
2021-01-18 13:59 ` Gao Xiang
2021-01-18 15:52   ` 胡玮文 [this message]
2021-01-18 23:28     ` Gao Xiang
2021-01-19  6:02   ` 胡玮文
2021-01-19 15:43     ` Gao Xiang
2021-01-20  4:57       ` 胡玮文
2021-01-20  5:12         ` Gao Xiang
2021-01-21  6:07           ` 胡玮文
2021-01-21  7:22             ` 胡玮文
2021-01-21  9:22             ` Gao Xiang
2021-01-21 16:26           ` [PATCH v2] " Hu Weiwen
2021-01-22  2:31             ` Gao Xiang
2021-01-22 12:43             ` Gao Xiang
2021-02-14 15:22             ` Gao Xiang via Linux-erofs
2021-02-14 16:00             ` [PATCH v3] erofs-utils: fix battach on full buffer blocks Gao Xiang via Linux-erofs
2021-02-22 15:34               ` Li GuiFu via Linux-erofs

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210118155205.GA21706@DESKTOP-N4CECTO.huww98.cn \
    --to=sehuww@mail.scut.edu.cn \
    --cc=hsiangkao@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH] erofs-utils: fix battach on full buffer block' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
on how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox