From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB489C433E0 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 00:16:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04A4023A53 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 00:16:32 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 04A4023A53 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-erofs-bounces+linux-erofs=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DMKYp4cK4zDrVX for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 11:16:30 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com (client-ip=216.205.24.124; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com; envelope-from=hsiangkao@redhat.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=TJmBeqZT; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=TJmBeqZT; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DMKYh0p08zDqW7 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 11:16:22 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1611274579; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=OEUHNmj2c+6xzQ3C4zUEpnec1vic/0zaToT3PoT2vUM=; b=TJmBeqZTUeNcykx7vaKGNA+ZbMFLaWEdbyFS9KG/DHMTCzH8imdGD8iua1BZs/srIVgCk/ mJERTK5Kj4JU1Y68JRxNufZUKaynV7a5cPOd1BHMxJenx0c41b+74rTls3CxeXqmspe8gv qq5sWk6fxClz5i9vWunyuTc5qaatMxw= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1611274579; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=OEUHNmj2c+6xzQ3C4zUEpnec1vic/0zaToT3PoT2vUM=; b=TJmBeqZTUeNcykx7vaKGNA+ZbMFLaWEdbyFS9KG/DHMTCzH8imdGD8iua1BZs/srIVgCk/ mJERTK5Kj4JU1Y68JRxNufZUKaynV7a5cPOd1BHMxJenx0c41b+74rTls3CxeXqmspe8gv qq5sWk6fxClz5i9vWunyuTc5qaatMxw= Received: from mail-pf1-f197.google.com (mail-pf1-f197.google.com [209.85.210.197]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-197-iUC4gexEP06SGsjiQKGJxQ-1; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 19:16:17 -0500 X-MC-Unique: iUC4gexEP06SGsjiQKGJxQ-1 Received: by mail-pf1-f197.google.com with SMTP id y187so2234069pfc.7 for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 16:16:17 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=OEUHNmj2c+6xzQ3C4zUEpnec1vic/0zaToT3PoT2vUM=; b=DpiZNvCgpV2fKhq/ydeylOXUlFZaXw9ZIFKLedD9/zfXwy0Doas3ChiDm2VkpSNLAB rg+61EWVFbEoKkRap5Sqcd6++AAH+LaRzXbNGvqracn9oMp2BhLEGkIjdDkXMHccdO3r 8yOBTpqQJQ+QepjBjN4jaMIqjppVSqC2epP5Jqsj5JDJWsygggZMw2z0H7Zkg65Z5C74 CkDAAzwPA8O6UXcLRO+vFZCCWkc7nmu+p231DlQ50FQuQisvrgtpryyWgkx77eb+URLn xPSj9uQp97LXQJDlhi4R1ZT2rOW8AiJ7aNIpdP4UUXH0LlPzH7RrzmrJG0HrvPxSp/oy r4yg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532St4mk8hOwYhmmbv7qkYZmryFGc2olZAe9YIr/I+eHql7gcG/h qwjn3i7fjnr15tMLLkMmhHzubWcDfjiZ41arrlQDqu2U8gUzVR/I0QelA6Kybfx6N6V3G8uaYLX x/uFm0jEWJfgqSvmyio/WAvPW X-Received: by 2002:a63:2265:: with SMTP id t37mr1910115pgm.336.1611274576248; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 16:16:16 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzwdDiyWswqFIs02xtsORaOM6j4Zl2KiNd8HQyY1UPYum0lhqgVq+XHHhw4mfQyTqgvyvJbJQ== X-Received: by 2002:a63:2265:: with SMTP id t37mr1910098pgm.336.1611274576006; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 16:16:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from xiangao.remote.csb ([209.132.188.80]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s11sm5724834pfu.69.2021.01.21.16.16.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 21 Jan 2021 16:16:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 08:16:05 +0800 From: Gao Xiang To: Hu Weiwen Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] erofs-utils: tests: fix distcheck Message-ID: <20210122001605.GC2996701@xiangao.remote.csb> References: <20210121163715.10660-1-sehuww@mail.scut.edu.cn> <20210121163715.10660-5-sehuww@mail.scut.edu.cn> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210121163715.10660-5-sehuww@mail.scut.edu.cn> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=hsiangkao@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Linux EROFS file system List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linux-erofs-bounces+linux-erofs=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linux-erofs" Hi Weiwen, On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 12:37:12AM +0800, Hu Weiwen wrote: > To get required files to final .tar.gz distribution: > * Any header files should goes into _SOURCES. should we use noinst_HEADERS instead? do you have some reference link (I mean document) for this? what's the impact of this, just dictcheck? I'm not familiar with that... > * check scripts should goes into dist_check_SCRIPTS. > * 001.out will trigger a GNU make implicit rule, rename it to 001-out How about also renaming $tmp.out to $tmp.stdout? Also, 'since experimental-tests' has't merged into dev, do you mind me folding these bugfix patches (I mean except for "[PATCH 5/7] and [PATCH 7/7]") into the original patches, and add your contribution description & SOB(Signed-off-by:) to the commit message? That would make the whole commit history much cleaner... If you agree that, I will resend the testcase patchset later with your fixes and new patches and wait for Guifu to review if he has extra free slots. Note that, only dev & master branches have stable commit ids. experimental-xxx could be rebased frequently. Thanks, Gao Xiang