From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43E81C432BE for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 13:43:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1EDF61131 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 13:43:17 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org B1EDF61131 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4GrjWm2nKYz3cLY for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 23:43:16 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=IaC1FKGG; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=198.145.29.99; helo=mail.kernel.org; envelope-from=xiang@kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=IaC1FKGG; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GrjWj1N7Nz3bnK for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 23:43:12 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 69CCC60FE6; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 13:43:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1629466990; bh=X5QL1gh1lptSTmcs5lKjLvElC6JSwyBdeLCEHmDLJUQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=IaC1FKGG0biojkDtaQDwhp/1T6A9EkEFkb36thCierZFP6ntaKE0X1SFf9BsQMhkR Bn4UHMtI9cd6jLkrZsdNl/4RAM/D8/45/+0P/gwulLQIr4QLkIb3dwBHE8jHByWhIv oRBZnH17SpblpM7vcmsIiXPbd/2ulxtOU0RBIp6QbbzeRjW2mEJTLj7eNkCOxdmBDp Am3K4fgV6sDy8ZylRlw8cZ1muTtCL3Fov0+DmPJ/po0HpO6QPivAAYqSIyOPbDXcsc 6wyyTXKnr0jSxfy62FpONLQQQdrqdAZmUtpyO2DMFF8OGmub6gTkO4zH+UlE7NW/kY JV1psY65wnLbA== Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 21:42:53 +0800 From: Gao Xiang To: Igor Eisberg Subject: Re: An issue with erofsfuse Message-ID: <20210820134248.GB25885@hsiangkao-HP-ZHAN-66-Pro-G1> Mail-Followup-To: Igor Eisberg , linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org References: <20210820124831.GA25021@hsiangkao-HP-ZHAN-66-Pro-G1> <20210820132656.GA25885@hsiangkao-HP-ZHAN-66-Pro-G1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-BeenThere: linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Linux EROFS file system List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linux-erofs-bounces+linux-erofs=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linux-erofs" On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 04:35:52PM +0300, Igor Eisberg wrote: > You're right, this is definitely what's missing: > > > linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffeb2163000) > > libfuse.so.2 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfuse.so.2 > > (0x00007ffb2d6b7000) > > libpthread.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0 > > (0x00007ffb2d694000) > > libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00007ffb2d4a3000) > > libdl.so.2 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdl.so.2 (0x00007ffb2d49d000) > > /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007ffb2d728000) > > > > And actually when running configure, I notice this: > > > checking lz4.h usability... no > > checking lz4.h presence... no > > checking for lz4.h... no > > > > Not sure what I'm missing here though... Maybe "sudo apt install liblz4-dev" for debian. (Anyway, I may need to add another erofsfuse package for Debian sid, I may seek some time to do this.) Thanks, Gao Xiang > > $ apt list --installed | grep lz4 > > liblz4-1/now 1.9.3-2 amd64 [installed,local] > > lz4/now 1.9.3-2 amd64 [installed,local] > > >