From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EE61C433EF for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 23:51:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5B9E610CF for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 23:51:55 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org C5B9E610CF Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=canb.auug.org.au Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4HgMmB2DJcz307C for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 10:51:54 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=canb.auug.org.au header.i=@canb.auug.org.au header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=201702 header.b=YD23+ciz; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org (gandalf.ozlabs.org [150.107.74.76]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HgMm33B54z2yPc for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 10:51:47 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=canb.auug.org.au header.i=@canb.auug.org.au header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=201702 header.b=YD23+ciz; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4HgMlw4DB8z4xYy; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 10:51:40 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=canb.auug.org.au; s=201702; t=1635465102; bh=BBq1Yspji0vJm9R7zIGdVaVx2DU7+FD6B6UrqSLpbPg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=YD23+cizlmSgewjdmhU7noKEZETmDps4i3fEy4IW/h0x6VStpgpxY1SvfXRmhLtgC R73C2AZR/Zrym+A1IeFvOgQbitR7EGkFxQf2ORBS1apsKDtBt+EQj4fHovArvkT+kf nxR1Bm0IAGIfvB3B4H1UIssoHggQZvP8YWpJU7ptHk1b99ZDJ8zxYcQOkZ6KEP84P1 vmYaqwCIDQ6FGWqA0g1ZhEHfTSfvaWL9UZW2oNOXFweire0ERYucF3+NhB82qjA5Id NJ/2F+0+PVhmuDV3uC5qLEVXNIGPdBL1KvnMm3S66zK15p/TeHFQGImQ+t3EncV3RW XO4GmcNhtz05g== Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 10:51:39 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Dan Williams Subject: Re: futher decouple DAX from block devices Message-ID: <20211029105139.1194bb7f@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: References: <20211018044054.1779424-1-hch@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/SsoWmhnAUHONY.PedkLs.lt"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 X-BeenThere: linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Linux EROFS file system List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Linux NVDIMM , Mike Snitzer , linux-s390 , linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-xfs , device-mapper development , linux-fsdevel , linux-ext4 , Ira Weiny , Christoph Hellwig Errors-To: linux-erofs-bounces+linux-erofs=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linux-erofs" --Sig_/SsoWmhnAUHONY.PedkLs.lt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Dan, On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 13:46:31 -0700 Dan Williams = wrote: > > My merge resolution is here [1]. Christoph, please have a look. The > rebase and the merge result are both passing my test and I'm now going > to review the individual patches. However, while I do that and collect > acks from DM and EROFS folks, I want to give Stephen a heads up that > this is coming. Primarily I want to see if someone sees a better > strategy to merge this, please let me know, but if not I plan to walk > Stephen and Linus through the resolution. It doesn't look to bad to me (however it is a bit late in the cycle :-( ). Once you are happy, just put it in your tree (some of the conflicts are against the current -rc3 based version of your tree anyway) and I will cope with it on Monday. You could do a test merge against next-^^ (that leaves out Andrew's patch series) and if you think there is anything tricky please send me a "git diff-tree --cc HEAD" after you have resolved the conflicts to your satisfaction and committed the test merge or just point me at the test merge in a tree somewhere (like this one). --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell --Sig_/SsoWmhnAUHONY.PedkLs.lt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAmF7N4sACgkQAVBC80lX 0Gxw2gf/TsRhRytrNIQkXZwCrlHR+hjJ895jJhg4Hp+ig2QzzYRjM/GrSPzXAXF3 s5SscPXv7egnMo+fHKY9d/CscYD6kDg4FtBuvoJqx/ApGN4PQLme5S3KbxrNRgd2 2vpBRjXN+26toUw0W2PK1gzHRJXaB6waOFbA6crbuWU1BDzVZoeRHfjKtlBMax7Q g6pzcvDzs7ia50KBJvi6hNkxCy7xuNAsLlm96930v/bLvnUYo6dOGrzZ6/Kjzjcw LpWIuVQGxkzBiILaGSiHuNfzZEbSvoSXMfMRJ5KBpAhB8M1dhuyqP4QBWMwe7+Tn Oo6WLOwKx89LL+uStt4yje6yx9483w== =+eTD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/SsoWmhnAUHONY.PedkLs.lt--