* [PATCH-v2] erofs: code for verifying superblock checksum of an erofs image.
@ 2019-10-22 15:39 Pratik Shinde
2019-10-22 16:34 ` Gao Xiang via Linux-erofs
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Pratik Shinde @ 2019-10-22 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-erofs, gaoxiang25, yuchao0; +Cc: linux-kernel
Patch for kernel side changes of checksum feature.Used kernel's
crc32c library for calculating the checksum.
Signed-off-by: Pratik Shinde <pratikshinde320@gmail.com>
---
fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h | 5 +++--
fs/erofs/internal.h | 3 ++-
fs/erofs/super.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h b/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h
index b1ee565..4d8097a 100644
--- a/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h
+++ b/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
*/
#define EROFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_LZ4_0PADDING 0x00000001
#define EROFS_ALL_FEATURE_INCOMPAT EROFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_LZ4_0PADDING
+#define EROFS_FEATURE_COMPAT_SB_CHKSUM 0x00000001
/* 128-byte erofs on-disk super block */
struct erofs_super_block {
@@ -37,8 +38,8 @@ struct erofs_super_block {
__u8 uuid[16]; /* 128-bit uuid for volume */
__u8 volume_name[16]; /* volume name */
__le32 feature_incompat;
-
- __u8 reserved2[44];
+ __le32 chksum_blocks; /* number of blocks used for checksum */
+ __u8 reserved2[40];
};
/*
diff --git a/fs/erofs/internal.h b/fs/erofs/internal.h
index 544a453..cec27ca 100644
--- a/fs/erofs/internal.h
+++ b/fs/erofs/internal.h
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ struct erofs_sb_info {
u8 uuid[16]; /* 128-bit uuid for volume */
u8 volume_name[16]; /* volume name */
u32 feature_incompat;
-
+ u32 feature_compat;
unsigned int mount_opt;
};
@@ -426,6 +426,7 @@ static inline void z_erofs_exit_zip_subsystem(void) {}
#endif /* !CONFIG_EROFS_FS_ZIP */
#define EFSCORRUPTED EUCLEAN /* Filesystem is corrupted */
+#define EFSBADCRC EBADMSG /* Bad crc found */
#endif /* __EROFS_INTERNAL_H */
diff --git a/fs/erofs/super.c b/fs/erofs/super.c
index 0e36949..9cda72d 100644
--- a/fs/erofs/super.c
+++ b/fs/erofs/super.c
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
#include <linux/statfs.h>
#include <linux/parser.h>
#include <linux/seq_file.h>
+#include <linux/crc32c.h>
#include "xattr.h"
#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
@@ -46,6 +47,31 @@ void _erofs_info(struct super_block *sb, const char *function,
va_end(args);
}
+static int erofs_validate_sb_chksum(struct erofs_super_block *dsb,
+ struct super_block *sb)
+{
+ u32 disk_chksum, nblocks, crc = 0;
+ void *kaddr;
+ struct page *page;
+ int i;
+
+ disk_chksum = le32_to_cpu(dsb->checksum);
+ nblocks = le32_to_cpu(dsb->chksum_blocks);
+ dsb->checksum = 0;
+ for (i = 0; i < nblocks; i++) {
+ page = erofs_get_meta_page(sb, i);
+ if (IS_ERR(page))
+ return PTR_ERR(page);
+ kaddr = kmap(page);
+ crc = crc32c(crc, kaddr, EROFS_BLKSIZ);
+ kunmap(page);
+ unlock_page(page);
+ }
+ if (crc != disk_chksum)
+ return -EFSBADCRC;
+ return 0;
+}
+
static void erofs_inode_init_once(void *ptr)
{
struct erofs_inode *vi = ptr;
@@ -121,6 +147,13 @@ static int erofs_read_superblock(struct super_block *sb)
goto out;
}
+ if (dsb->feature_compat & EROFS_FEATURE_COMPAT_SB_CHKSUM) {
+ ret = erofs_validate_sb_chksum(dsb, sb);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ erofs_err(sb, "super block checksum incorrect");
+ goto out;
+ }
+ }
blkszbits = dsb->blkszbits;
/* 9(512 bytes) + LOG_SECTORS_PER_BLOCK == LOG_BLOCK_SIZE */
if (blkszbits != LOG_BLOCK_SIZE) {
--
2.9.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH-v2] erofs: code for verifying superblock checksum of an erofs image.
2019-10-22 15:39 [PATCH-v2] erofs: code for verifying superblock checksum of an erofs image Pratik Shinde
@ 2019-10-22 16:34 ` Gao Xiang via Linux-erofs
2019-10-22 16:48 ` Pratik Shinde
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Gao Xiang via Linux-erofs @ 2019-10-22 16:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pratik Shinde; +Cc: linux-erofs, linux-kernel
Hi Pratik,
Some comments as below...
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 09:09:56PM +0530, Pratik Shinde wrote:
> Patch for kernel side changes of checksum feature.Used kernel's
> crc32c library for calculating the checksum.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pratik Shinde <pratikshinde320@gmail.com>
> ---
> fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h | 5 +++--
> fs/erofs/internal.h | 3 ++-
> fs/erofs/super.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h b/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h
> index b1ee565..4d8097a 100644
> --- a/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h
> +++ b/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> */
> #define EROFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_LZ4_0PADDING 0x00000001
> #define EROFS_ALL_FEATURE_INCOMPAT EROFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_LZ4_0PADDING
> +#define EROFS_FEATURE_COMPAT_SB_CHKSUM 0x00000001
>
> /* 128-byte erofs on-disk super block */
> struct erofs_super_block {
> @@ -37,8 +38,8 @@ struct erofs_super_block {
> __u8 uuid[16]; /* 128-bit uuid for volume */
> __u8 volume_name[16]; /* volume name */
> __le32 feature_incompat;
> -
> - __u8 reserved2[44];
> + __le32 chksum_blocks; /* number of blocks used for checksum */
> + __u8 reserved2[40];
> };
>
> /*
> diff --git a/fs/erofs/internal.h b/fs/erofs/internal.h
> index 544a453..cec27ca 100644
> --- a/fs/erofs/internal.h
> +++ b/fs/erofs/internal.h
> @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ struct erofs_sb_info {
> u8 uuid[16]; /* 128-bit uuid for volume */
> u8 volume_name[16]; /* volume name */
> u32 feature_incompat;
> -
> + u32 feature_compat;
> unsigned int mount_opt;
> };
>
> @@ -426,6 +426,7 @@ static inline void z_erofs_exit_zip_subsystem(void) {}
> #endif /* !CONFIG_EROFS_FS_ZIP */
>
> #define EFSCORRUPTED EUCLEAN /* Filesystem is corrupted */
> +#define EFSBADCRC EBADMSG /* Bad crc found */
>
> #endif /* __EROFS_INTERNAL_H */
>
> diff --git a/fs/erofs/super.c b/fs/erofs/super.c
> index 0e36949..9cda72d 100644
> --- a/fs/erofs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/erofs/super.c
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> #include <linux/statfs.h>
> #include <linux/parser.h>
> #include <linux/seq_file.h>
> +#include <linux/crc32c.h>
> #include "xattr.h"
>
> #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> @@ -46,6 +47,31 @@ void _erofs_info(struct super_block *sb, const char *function,
> va_end(args);
> }
>
> +static int erofs_validate_sb_chksum(struct erofs_super_block *dsb,
> + struct super_block *sb)
> +{
> + u32 disk_chksum, nblocks, crc = 0;
> + void *kaddr;
> + struct page *page;
> + int i;
> +
> + disk_chksum = le32_to_cpu(dsb->checksum);
> + nblocks = le32_to_cpu(dsb->chksum_blocks);
We cannot write the page data directly since the page cache should be kept in
sync with ondisk data (or for read-write fs, if it's claimed as uptodated, and
it is modified later, you should mark it dirty, and do writeback then, but
that is not the erofs case.)
> + dsb->checksum = 0;
> + for (i = 0; i < nblocks; i++) {
> + page = erofs_get_meta_page(sb, i);
> + if (IS_ERR(page))
> + return PTR_ERR(page);
> + kaddr = kmap(page);
Here kmap_atomic(page) is better. what I mean is kmap_atomic() in the caller
erofs_read_superblock(), it should be replaced to kmap() instead.
> + crc = crc32c(crc, kaddr, EROFS_BLKSIZ);
> + kunmap(page);
> + unlock_page(page);
need
put_page(page);
I'm not sure whether I explained quite well, but this patch needs something
to do. I'm now working on demonstrating new XZ algorithm and releasing
erofs-utils v1.0.
You can give more tries or I will help later. :-)
Thanks,
Gao Xiang
> + }
> + if (crc != disk_chksum)
> + return -EFSBADCRC;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static void erofs_inode_init_once(void *ptr)
> {
> struct erofs_inode *vi = ptr;
> @@ -121,6 +147,13 @@ static int erofs_read_superblock(struct super_block *sb)
> goto out;
> }
>
> + if (dsb->feature_compat & EROFS_FEATURE_COMPAT_SB_CHKSUM) {
> + ret = erofs_validate_sb_chksum(dsb, sb);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + erofs_err(sb, "super block checksum incorrect");
> + goto out;
> + }
> + }
> blkszbits = dsb->blkszbits;
> /* 9(512 bytes) + LOG_SECTORS_PER_BLOCK == LOG_BLOCK_SIZE */
> if (blkszbits != LOG_BLOCK_SIZE) {
> --
> 2.9.3
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH-v2] erofs: code for verifying superblock checksum of an erofs image.
2019-10-22 16:34 ` Gao Xiang via Linux-erofs
@ 2019-10-22 16:48 ` Pratik Shinde
2019-10-22 17:03 ` Gao Xiang via Linux-erofs
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Pratik Shinde @ 2019-10-22 16:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gao Xiang; +Cc: linux-erofs, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5218 bytes --]
Hi Gao,
Understood your concern.
Can we do something like :
1) Allocate one buf of size EROFS_BLKSIZ
2) Read one page at a time into buf(memcpy) .call crc32c for it.
In this way we won't be writing directly into page data and will not do
large allocation.
What do you think?
--Pratik
On Tue, 22 Oct, 2019, 10:04 PM Gao Xiang, <hsiangkao@aol.com> wrote:
> Hi Pratik,
>
> Some comments as below...
>
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 09:09:56PM +0530, Pratik Shinde wrote:
> > Patch for kernel side changes of checksum feature.Used kernel's
> > crc32c library for calculating the checksum.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pratik Shinde <pratikshinde320@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h | 5 +++--
> > fs/erofs/internal.h | 3 ++-
> > fs/erofs/super.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h b/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h
> > index b1ee565..4d8097a 100644
> > --- a/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h
> > +++ b/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h
> > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> > */
> > #define EROFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_LZ4_0PADDING 0x00000001
> > #define EROFS_ALL_FEATURE_INCOMPAT
> EROFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_LZ4_0PADDING
> > +#define EROFS_FEATURE_COMPAT_SB_CHKSUM 0x00000001
> >
> > /* 128-byte erofs on-disk super block */
> > struct erofs_super_block {
> > @@ -37,8 +38,8 @@ struct erofs_super_block {
> > __u8 uuid[16]; /* 128-bit uuid for volume */
> > __u8 volume_name[16]; /* volume name */
> > __le32 feature_incompat;
> > -
> > - __u8 reserved2[44];
> > + __le32 chksum_blocks; /* number of blocks used for checksum */
> > + __u8 reserved2[40];
> > };
> >
> > /*
> > diff --git a/fs/erofs/internal.h b/fs/erofs/internal.h
> > index 544a453..cec27ca 100644
> > --- a/fs/erofs/internal.h
> > +++ b/fs/erofs/internal.h
> > @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ struct erofs_sb_info {
> > u8 uuid[16]; /* 128-bit uuid for volume */
> > u8 volume_name[16]; /* volume name */
> > u32 feature_incompat;
> > -
> > + u32 feature_compat;
> > unsigned int mount_opt;
> > };
> >
> > @@ -426,6 +426,7 @@ static inline void z_erofs_exit_zip_subsystem(void)
> {}
> > #endif /* !CONFIG_EROFS_FS_ZIP */
> >
> > #define EFSCORRUPTED EUCLEAN /* Filesystem is corrupted */
> > +#define EFSBADCRC EBADMSG /* Bad crc found */
> >
> > #endif /* __EROFS_INTERNAL_H */
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/erofs/super.c b/fs/erofs/super.c
> > index 0e36949..9cda72d 100644
> > --- a/fs/erofs/super.c
> > +++ b/fs/erofs/super.c
> > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> > #include <linux/statfs.h>
> > #include <linux/parser.h>
> > #include <linux/seq_file.h>
> > +#include <linux/crc32c.h>
> > #include "xattr.h"
> >
> > #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> > @@ -46,6 +47,31 @@ void _erofs_info(struct super_block *sb, const char
> *function,
> > va_end(args);
> > }
> >
> > +static int erofs_validate_sb_chksum(struct erofs_super_block *dsb,
> > + struct super_block *sb)
> > +{
> > + u32 disk_chksum, nblocks, crc = 0;
> > + void *kaddr;
> > + struct page *page;
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + disk_chksum = le32_to_cpu(dsb->checksum);
> > + nblocks = le32_to_cpu(dsb->chksum_blocks);
>
> We cannot write the page data directly since the page cache should be kept
> in
> sync with ondisk data (or for read-write fs, if it's claimed as uptodated,
> and
> it is modified later, you should mark it dirty, and do writeback then, but
> that is not the erofs case.)
>
> > + dsb->checksum = 0;
> > + for (i = 0; i < nblocks; i++) {
> > + page = erofs_get_meta_page(sb, i);
> > + if (IS_ERR(page))
> > + return PTR_ERR(page);
> > + kaddr = kmap(page);
>
> Here kmap_atomic(page) is better. what I mean is kmap_atomic() in the
> caller
> erofs_read_superblock(), it should be replaced to kmap() instead.
>
> > + crc = crc32c(crc, kaddr, EROFS_BLKSIZ);
> > + kunmap(page);
> > + unlock_page(page);
>
> need
> put_page(page);
>
>
> I'm not sure whether I explained quite well, but this patch needs something
> to do. I'm now working on demonstrating new XZ algorithm and releasing
> erofs-utils v1.0.
>
> You can give more tries or I will help later. :-)
>
> Thanks,
> Gao Xiang
>
>
> > + }
> > + if (crc != disk_chksum)
> > + return -EFSBADCRC;
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > static void erofs_inode_init_once(void *ptr)
> > {
> > struct erofs_inode *vi = ptr;
> > @@ -121,6 +147,13 @@ static int erofs_read_superblock(struct super_block
> *sb)
> > goto out;
> > }
> >
> > + if (dsb->feature_compat & EROFS_FEATURE_COMPAT_SB_CHKSUM) {
> > + ret = erofs_validate_sb_chksum(dsb, sb);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + erofs_err(sb, "super block checksum incorrect");
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > + }
> > blkszbits = dsb->blkszbits;
> > /* 9(512 bytes) + LOG_SECTORS_PER_BLOCK == LOG_BLOCK_SIZE */
> > if (blkszbits != LOG_BLOCK_SIZE) {
> > --
> > 2.9.3
> >
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 7119 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH-v2] erofs: code for verifying superblock checksum of an erofs image.
2019-10-22 16:48 ` Pratik Shinde
@ 2019-10-22 17:03 ` Gao Xiang via Linux-erofs
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Gao Xiang via Linux-erofs @ 2019-10-22 17:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pratik Shinde; +Cc: linux-erofs, linux-kernel
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 10:18:23PM +0530, Pratik Shinde wrote:
> Hi Gao,
>
> Understood your concern.
>
> Can we do something like :
>
> 1) Allocate one buf of size EROFS_BLKSIZ
> 2) Read one page at a time into buf(memcpy) .call crc32c for it.
>
> In this way we won't be writing directly into page data and will not do
> large allocation.
> What do you think?
Yes, that is the right way, but the buf is only be used to calc
the 0th block (super_block), for the rest blocks, no need to do this.
buf = kmalloc(EROFS_BLKSIZ);
memcpy(buf, data);
dsb->checksum = 0;
crc = crc32c(0, buf);
kfree(buf);
for (i = 1; i < nblocks; ++i) {
page = get_meta_page(sb, i);
data = kmap_atomic(page);
crc = crc32c(crc, data);
kunmap_atomic(data);
unlock_page(page);
put_page(page);
}
...
Or some better approach, but it's not ok to modify page cache directly.
Thanks,
Gao Xiang
>
> --Pratik
>
> On Tue, 22 Oct, 2019, 10:04 PM Gao Xiang, <hsiangkao@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Pratik,
> >
> > Some comments as below...
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 09:09:56PM +0530, Pratik Shinde wrote:
> > > Patch for kernel side changes of checksum feature.Used kernel's
> > > crc32c library for calculating the checksum.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Pratik Shinde <pratikshinde320@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > > fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h | 5 +++--
> > > fs/erofs/internal.h | 3 ++-
> > > fs/erofs/super.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h b/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h
> > > index b1ee565..4d8097a 100644
> > > --- a/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h
> > > +++ b/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h
> > > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> > > */
> > > #define EROFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_LZ4_0PADDING 0x00000001
> > > #define EROFS_ALL_FEATURE_INCOMPAT
> > EROFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_LZ4_0PADDING
> > > +#define EROFS_FEATURE_COMPAT_SB_CHKSUM 0x00000001
> > >
> > > /* 128-byte erofs on-disk super block */
> > > struct erofs_super_block {
> > > @@ -37,8 +38,8 @@ struct erofs_super_block {
> > > __u8 uuid[16]; /* 128-bit uuid for volume */
> > > __u8 volume_name[16]; /* volume name */
> > > __le32 feature_incompat;
> > > -
> > > - __u8 reserved2[44];
> > > + __le32 chksum_blocks; /* number of blocks used for checksum */
> > > + __u8 reserved2[40];
> > > };
> > >
> > > /*
> > > diff --git a/fs/erofs/internal.h b/fs/erofs/internal.h
> > > index 544a453..cec27ca 100644
> > > --- a/fs/erofs/internal.h
> > > +++ b/fs/erofs/internal.h
> > > @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ struct erofs_sb_info {
> > > u8 uuid[16]; /* 128-bit uuid for volume */
> > > u8 volume_name[16]; /* volume name */
> > > u32 feature_incompat;
> > > -
> > > + u32 feature_compat;
> > > unsigned int mount_opt;
> > > };
> > >
> > > @@ -426,6 +426,7 @@ static inline void z_erofs_exit_zip_subsystem(void)
> > {}
> > > #endif /* !CONFIG_EROFS_FS_ZIP */
> > >
> > > #define EFSCORRUPTED EUCLEAN /* Filesystem is corrupted */
> > > +#define EFSBADCRC EBADMSG /* Bad crc found */
> > >
> > > #endif /* __EROFS_INTERNAL_H */
> > >
> > > diff --git a/fs/erofs/super.c b/fs/erofs/super.c
> > > index 0e36949..9cda72d 100644
> > > --- a/fs/erofs/super.c
> > > +++ b/fs/erofs/super.c
> > > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> > > #include <linux/statfs.h>
> > > #include <linux/parser.h>
> > > #include <linux/seq_file.h>
> > > +#include <linux/crc32c.h>
> > > #include "xattr.h"
> > >
> > > #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> > > @@ -46,6 +47,31 @@ void _erofs_info(struct super_block *sb, const char
> > *function,
> > > va_end(args);
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static int erofs_validate_sb_chksum(struct erofs_super_block *dsb,
> > > + struct super_block *sb)
> > > +{
> > > + u32 disk_chksum, nblocks, crc = 0;
> > > + void *kaddr;
> > > + struct page *page;
> > > + int i;
> > > +
> > > + disk_chksum = le32_to_cpu(dsb->checksum);
> > > + nblocks = le32_to_cpu(dsb->chksum_blocks);
> >
> > We cannot write the page data directly since the page cache should be kept
> > in
> > sync with ondisk data (or for read-write fs, if it's claimed as uptodated,
> > and
> > it is modified later, you should mark it dirty, and do writeback then, but
> > that is not the erofs case.)
> >
> > > + dsb->checksum = 0;
> > > + for (i = 0; i < nblocks; i++) {
> > > + page = erofs_get_meta_page(sb, i);
> > > + if (IS_ERR(page))
> > > + return PTR_ERR(page);
> > > + kaddr = kmap(page);
> >
> > Here kmap_atomic(page) is better. what I mean is kmap_atomic() in the
> > caller
> > erofs_read_superblock(), it should be replaced to kmap() instead.
> >
> > > + crc = crc32c(crc, kaddr, EROFS_BLKSIZ);
> > > + kunmap(page);
> > > + unlock_page(page);
> >
> > need
> > put_page(page);
> >
> >
> > I'm not sure whether I explained quite well, but this patch needs something
> > to do. I'm now working on demonstrating new XZ algorithm and releasing
> > erofs-utils v1.0.
> >
> > You can give more tries or I will help later. :-)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Gao Xiang
> >
> >
> > > + }
> > > + if (crc != disk_chksum)
> > > + return -EFSBADCRC;
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static void erofs_inode_init_once(void *ptr)
> > > {
> > > struct erofs_inode *vi = ptr;
> > > @@ -121,6 +147,13 @@ static int erofs_read_superblock(struct super_block
> > *sb)
> > > goto out;
> > > }
> > >
> > > + if (dsb->feature_compat & EROFS_FEATURE_COMPAT_SB_CHKSUM) {
> > > + ret = erofs_validate_sb_chksum(dsb, sb);
> > > + if (ret < 0) {
> > > + erofs_err(sb, "super block checksum incorrect");
> > > + goto out;
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > blkszbits = dsb->blkszbits;
> > > /* 9(512 bytes) + LOG_SECTORS_PER_BLOCK == LOG_BLOCK_SIZE */
> > > if (blkszbits != LOG_BLOCK_SIZE) {
> > > --
> > > 2.9.3
> > >
> >
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-10-22 17:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-10-22 15:39 [PATCH-v2] erofs: code for verifying superblock checksum of an erofs image Pratik Shinde
2019-10-22 16:34 ` Gao Xiang via Linux-erofs
2019-10-22 16:48 ` Pratik Shinde
2019-10-22 17:03 ` Gao Xiang via Linux-erofs
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).