From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABA47C4338F for ; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 13:19:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAF3660F9E for ; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 13:19:30 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org BAF3660F9E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4GjKYs36jzz30DR for ; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 23:19:29 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com (client-ip=115.124.30.45; helo=out30-45.freemail.mail.aliyun.com; envelope-from=hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com; receiver=) Received: from out30-45.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-45.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.45]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GjKYj6z5Gz2xfx for ; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 23:19:18 +1000 (AEST) X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS; BC=-1|-1; BR=01201311R331e4; CH=green; DM=||false|; DS=||; FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1; HT=e01e04420; MF=hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com; NM=1; PH=DS; RN=8; SR=0; TI=SMTPD_---0UiIy9u2_1628428741; Received: from B-P7TQMD6M-0146.local(mailfrom:hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0UiIy9u2_1628428741) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Sun, 08 Aug 2021 21:19:03 +0800 Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2021 21:19:01 +0800 From: Gao Xiang To: Wei Yongjun Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] erofs: make symbol 'erofs_iomap_ops' static Message-ID: References: <20210808063343.255817-1-weiyongjun1@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210808063343.255817-1-weiyongjun1@huawei.com> X-BeenThere: linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Linux EROFS file system List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hulk Robot , Gao Xiang , linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linux-erofs-bounces+linux-erofs=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linux-erofs" On Sun, Aug 08, 2021 at 06:33:43AM +0000, Wei Yongjun wrote: > The sparse tool complains as follows: > > fs/erofs/data.c:150:24: warning: > symbol 'erofs_iomap_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? > > This symbol is not used outside of data.c, so marks it static. > > Fixes: 3e9ce908c114 ("erofs: iomap support for non-tailpacking DIO") > Reported-by: Hulk Robot > Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun Thanks, Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang Thanks, Gao Xiang