From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1BC7C4338F for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 04:31:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B45D60C3F for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 04:31:05 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 2B45D60C3F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Gff1z60Fxz3bPV for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 14:31:03 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com (client-ip=115.124.30.130; helo=out30-130.freemail.mail.aliyun.com; envelope-from=hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com; receiver=) Received: from out30-130.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-130.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.130]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Gff1r1Sk1z308Y for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 14:30:54 +1000 (AEST) X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS; BC=-1|-1; BR=01201311R611e4; CH=green; DM=||false|; DS=||; FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1; HT=alimailimapcm10staff010182156082; MF=hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com; NM=1; PH=DS; RN=11; SR=0; TI=SMTPD_---0UhwJ.LP_1628051435; Received: from B-P7TQMD6M-0146.local(mailfrom:hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0UhwJ.LP_1628051435) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Wed, 04 Aug 2021 12:30:37 +0800 Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2021 12:30:35 +0800 From: Gao Xiang To: Chao Yu Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] erofs: iomap support for non-tailpacking DIO Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Chao Yu , linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, LKML , "Darrick J. Wong" , Liu Bo , Joseph Qi , Liu Jiang , Huang Jianan , Tao Ma References: <20210730194625.93856-1-hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com> <20210730194625.93856-2-hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Linux EROFS file system List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, "Darrick J. Wong" , LKML , Joseph Qi , Liu Bo , Tao Ma , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Liu Jiang , linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linux-erofs-bounces+linux-erofs=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linux-erofs" Hi Chao, On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 10:57:08AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote: > On 2021/7/31 3:46, Gao Xiang wrote: ... > > } > > +static int erofs_iomap_begin(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t length, > > + unsigned int flags, struct iomap *iomap, struct iomap *srcmap) > > +{ > > + int ret; > > + struct erofs_map_blocks map; > > + > > + map.m_la = offset; > > + map.m_llen = length; > > + > > + ret = erofs_map_blocks_flatmode(inode, &map, EROFS_GET_BLOCKS_RAW); > > + if (ret < 0) > > + return ret; > > + > > + iomap->bdev = inode->i_sb->s_bdev; > > + iomap->offset = map.m_la; > > + iomap->length = map.m_llen; > > + iomap->flags = 0; > > + > > + if (!(map.m_flags & EROFS_MAP_MAPPED)) { > > + iomap->type = IOMAP_HOLE; > > + iomap->addr = IOMAP_NULL_ADDR; > > + if (!iomap->length) > > + iomap->length = length; > > This only happens for the case offset exceeds isize? Thanks for the review. Yeah, this is a convention (length 0 with !EROFS_MAP_MAPPED) for post-EOF in erofs_map_blocks_flatmode(), need to follow iomap rule as well. > > > + return 0; > > + } > > + > > + /* that shouldn't happen for now */ > > + if (map.m_flags & EROFS_MAP_META) { > > + DBG_BUGON(1); > > + return -ENOTBLK; > > + } > > + iomap->type = IOMAP_MAPPED; > > + iomap->addr = map.m_pa; > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +const struct iomap_ops erofs_iomap_ops = { > > + .iomap_begin = erofs_iomap_begin, > > +}; > > + > > +static int erofs_prepare_dio(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to) > > +{ > > + struct inode *inode = file_inode(iocb->ki_filp); > > + loff_t align = iocb->ki_pos | iov_iter_count(to) | > > + iov_iter_alignment(to); > > + struct block_device *bdev = inode->i_sb->s_bdev; > > + unsigned int blksize_mask; > > + > > + if (bdev) > > + blksize_mask = (1 << ilog2(bdev_logical_block_size(bdev))) - 1; > > + else > > + blksize_mask = (1 << inode->i_blkbits) - 1; > > + > > + if (align & blksize_mask) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + /* > > + * Temporarily fall back tail-packing inline to buffered I/O instead > > + * since tail-packing inline support relies on an iomap core update. > > + */ > > + if (EROFS_I(inode)->datalayout == EROFS_INODE_FLAT_INLINE && > > + iocb->ki_pos + iov_iter_count(to) > > > + rounddown(inode->i_size, EROFS_BLKSIZ)) > > + return 1; > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +static ssize_t erofs_file_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to) > > +{ > > + /* no need taking (shared) inode lock since it's a ro filesystem */ > > + if (!iov_iter_count(to)) > > + return 0; > > + > > + if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_DIRECT) { > > + int err = erofs_prepare_dio(iocb, to); > > + > > + if (!err) > > + return iomap_dio_rw(iocb, to, &erofs_iomap_ops, > > + NULL, 0); > > + if (err < 0) > > + return err; > > + /* > > + * Fallback to buffered I/O if the operation being performed on > > + * the inode is not supported by direct I/O. The IOCB_DIRECT > > + * flag needs to be cleared here in order to ensure that the > > + * direct I/O path within generic_file_read_iter() is not > > + * taken. > > + */ > > + iocb->ki_flags &= ~IOCB_DIRECT; > > + } > > + return generic_file_read_iter(iocb, to); > > It looks it's fine to call filemap_read() directly since above codes have > covered DIO case, then we don't need to change iocb->ki_flags flag, it's > minor though. Yeah, we could use filemap_read() here instead. yet IMO, it might be better to drop IOCB_DIRECT too to keep iocb consistent with the real semantics (even it's not used internally.) > > > +} > > + > > /* for uncompressed (aligned) files and raw access for other files */ > > const struct address_space_operations erofs_raw_access_aops = { > > .readpage = erofs_raw_access_readpage, > > .readahead = erofs_raw_access_readahead, > > .bmap = erofs_bmap, > > + .direct_IO = noop_direct_IO, > > +}; > > + > > +const struct file_operations erofs_file_fops = { > > + .llseek = generic_file_llseek, > > + .read_iter = erofs_file_read_iter, > > + .mmap = generic_file_readonly_mmap, > > + .splice_read = generic_file_splice_read, > > }; > > diff --git a/fs/erofs/inode.c b/fs/erofs/inode.c > > index aa8a0d770ba3..00edb7562fea 100644 > > --- a/fs/erofs/inode.c > > +++ b/fs/erofs/inode.c > > @@ -247,7 +247,10 @@ static int erofs_fill_inode(struct inode *inode, int isdir) > > switch (inode->i_mode & S_IFMT) { > > case S_IFREG: > > inode->i_op = &erofs_generic_iops; > > - inode->i_fop = &generic_ro_fops; > > + if (!erofs_inode_is_data_compressed(vi->datalayout)) > > + inode->i_fop = &erofs_file_fops; > > + else > > + inode->i_fop = &generic_ro_fops; > > if (erofs_inode_is_data_compressed(vi->datalayout)) > inode->i_fop = &generic_ro_fops; > else > inode->i_fop = &erofs_file_fops; > > Otherwise, it looks good to me. ok, will fix in the next version. Thanks, Gao Xiang > > Reviewed-by: Chao Yu > > Thanks > > > break; > > case S_IFDIR: > > inode->i_op = &erofs_dir_iops; > > diff --git a/fs/erofs/internal.h b/fs/erofs/internal.h > > index 543c2ff97d30..2669c785d548 100644 > > --- a/fs/erofs/internal.h > > +++ b/fs/erofs/internal.h > > @@ -371,6 +371,7 @@ static inline int z_erofs_map_blocks_iter(struct inode *inode, > > #endif /* !CONFIG_EROFS_FS_ZIP */ > > /* data.c */ > > +extern const struct file_operations erofs_file_fops; > > struct page *erofs_get_meta_page(struct super_block *sb, erofs_blk_t blkaddr); > > /* inode.c */ > >