Linux-EROFS Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
To: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Cc: Gao Xiang <xiang@kernel.org>,
	linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] erofs: support superblock checksum
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 20:36:00 +0800
Message-ID: <df7d7427-e7ca-5135-5db2-640eda30d253@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191023084536.GA16289@architecture4>

On 2019/10/23 16:45, Gao Xiang wrote:
> Hi Chao,
> 
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 04:15:29PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
>> Hi, Xiang, Pratik,
>>
>> On 2019/10/23 12:05, Gao Xiang wrote:
> 
> <snip>
> 
>>>  }
>>>  
>>> +static int erofs_superblock_csum_verify(struct super_block *sb, void *sbdata)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct erofs_super_block *dsb;
>>> +	u32 expected_crc, nblocks, crc;
>>> +	void *kaddr;
>>> +	struct page *page;
>>> +	int i;
>>> +
>>> +	dsb = kmemdup(sbdata + EROFS_SUPER_OFFSET,
>>> +		      EROFS_BLKSIZ - EROFS_SUPER_OFFSET, GFP_KERNEL);
>>> +	if (!dsb)
>>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>>> +
>>> +	expected_crc = le32_to_cpu(dsb->checksum);
>>> +	nblocks = le32_to_cpu(dsb->chksum_blocks);
>>
>> Now, we try to use nblocks's value before checking its validation, I guess fuzz
>> test can easily make the value extreme larger, result in checking latter blocks
>> unnecessarily.
>>
>> IMO, we'd better
>> 1. check validation of superblock to make sure all fields in sb are valid
>> 2. use .nblocks to count and check payload blocks following sb
> 
> That is quite a good point. :-)
> 
> My first thought is to check the following payloads of sb (e.g, some per-fs
> metadata should be checked at mount time together. or for small images, check
> the whole image at the mount time) as well since if we introduce a new feature
> to some kernel version, forward compatibility needs to be considered. So it's
> better to make proper scalability, for this case, we have some choices:
>  1) limit `chksum_blocks' upbound at runtime (e.g. refuse >= 65536 blocks,
>     totally 256M.)
>  2) just get rid of the whole `chksum_blocks' mess and checksum the first 4k
>     at all, don't consider any latter scalability.

Xiang, sorry for later reply...

I prefer method 2), let's enable chksum feature only on superblock first,
chksum_blocks feature can be added later.

Thanks,

> 
> Some perferred idea about this? I plan to release erofs-utils v1.0 tomorrow
> and hold up this feature for the next erofs-utils release, but I think we can
> get it ready for v5.5 since it is not quite complex feature...
> 
> Thanks,
> Gao Xiang
> 
> .
> 

  reply index

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-22 18:06 [PATCH-v3] erofs: code for verifying superblock checksum of an erofs image Pratik Shinde
2019-10-23  4:05 ` [PATCH v4] erofs: support superblock checksum Gao Xiang
2019-10-23  8:15   ` Chao Yu
2019-10-23  8:45     ` Gao Xiang
2019-10-28 12:36       ` Chao Yu [this message]
2019-10-28 13:44         ` Gao Xiang
2019-10-28 14:32           ` [PATCH v5] " Gao Xiang
2019-10-30  2:33             ` Chao Yu
2019-10-30  2:56               ` Gao Xiang
2019-10-30  5:08                 ` [PATCH v6] " Gao Xiang
2019-11-04  2:49                   ` [PATCH v7] " Gao Xiang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=df7d7427-e7ca-5135-5db2-640eda30d253@huawei.com \
    --to=yuchao0@huawei.com \
    --cc=gaoxiang25@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xiang@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux-EROFS Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-erofs/0 linux-erofs/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-erofs linux-erofs/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-erofs \
		linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org linux-erofs@ozlabs.org
	public-inbox-index linux-erofs

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.ozlabs.lists.linux-erofs


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git