From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=TiSZ=ZN=lists.ozlabs.org=linux-erofs-bounces+linux-erofs=archiver.kernel.org@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,
	USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85D1EC432C0
	for <linux-erofs@archiver.kernel.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 01:14:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CAA820692
	for <linux-erofs@archiver.kernel.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 01:14:05 +0000 (UTC)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3CAA820692
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-erofs-bounces+linux-erofs=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org
Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3])
	by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47JM5l1lLBzDqqD
	for <linux-erofs@archiver.kernel.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 12:14:03 +1100 (AEDT)
Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized)
 smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com (client-ip=45.249.212.190; helo=huawei.com;
 envelope-from=yuchao0@huawei.com; receiver=<UNKNOWN>)
Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org;
 dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com
Received: from huawei.com (szxga04-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.190])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47JM5f58q4zDqL2
 for <linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 12:13:58 +1100 (AEDT)
Received: from DGGEMS404-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58])
 by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 72A71103ACA40F9341B8;
 Thu, 21 Nov 2019 09:13:55 +0800 (CST)
Received: from [10.134.22.195] (10.134.22.195) by smtp.huawei.com
 (10.3.19.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Thu, 21 Nov
 2019 09:13:51 +0800
Subject: Re: [PATCH] erofs: remove unnecessary output in erofs_show_options()
To: Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@mykernel.net>, <xiang@kernel.org>, <chao@kernel.org>
References: <20191119115049.3401-1-cgxu519@mykernel.net>
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <f62b3c2e-1627-f629-fbf5-ecdfe5dda577@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 09:13:50 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20191119115049.3401-1-cgxu519@mykernel.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [10.134.22.195]
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-BeenThere: linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development of Linux EROFS file system <linux-erofs.lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/options/linux-erofs>,
 <mailto:linux-erofs-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linux-erofs/>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-erofs-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linux-erofs>,
 <mailto:linux-erofs-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org
Errors-To: linux-erofs-bounces+linux-erofs=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org
Sender: "Linux-erofs"
 <linux-erofs-bounces+linux-erofs=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org>

On 2019/11/19 19:50, Chengguang Xu wrote:
> We have already handled cache_strategy option carefully,
> so incorrect setting could not pass option parsing.
> Meanwhile, print 'cache_strategy=(unknown)' can cause
> failure on remount.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@mykernel.net>

Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>

Thanks,