From: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@bootlin.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: michael.opdenacker@bootlin.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Why isn't ext2 deprecated over ext4?
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 17:29:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <192cb320-2ded-4761-b0c9-3e273931f6f6@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240221110043.mj4v25a2mtmo54bw@quack3>
Hi Honza, all
Thanks for sharing all these details. See my follow-up questions below...
On 2/21/24 at 12:00, Jan Kara wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed 21-02-24 10:33:04, Michael Opdenacker wrote:
>> I'm wondering why ext2 isn't marked as deprecated yet as it has 32 bit dates
>> and dates will rollover in 2038 (in 14 years from now!).
>>
>> I'm asking because ext4, when used without a journal, seems to be a worthy
>> replacement and has 64 bit dates.
>>
>> I'll be happy to send a patch to fs/ext2/Kconfig to warn users.
> For all practical purposes I agree we expect users to use ext4 driver on a
> filesystem without a journal instead of ext2 driver. We are still keeping
> ext2 around mostly as a simple reference filesystem for other fs
> developers. I agree we should improve the kconfig text to reference users
> to ext4.
I can submit some changes to the Kconfig file along these lines, thanks!
>
> Regarding y2038 problem - this is really the matter of on-disk format as
> created by mke2fs, not so much of the kernel driver. And the kernel will be
> warning about that when you mount ext2 so I don't think special handling is
> needed for that.
So, if I understand correctly, it's mke2fs that should be creating a
filesystem with 64 bit dates, which the ext2 kernel driver could happily
support, right? However, I made an experiment by using "mkfs.ext2 -I
256" and I still got the warning:
[ 689.213780] ext2 filesystem being mounted at /mnt supports timestamps
until 2038-01-19 (0x7fffffff)
"tune2fs -l" also confirmed I had 256 byte inodes. Anything else I
should pass to mkfs.ext2 to get 64 bit dates in ext2?
By the way, the code shows that the warning is issued 30 years ahead of
time!
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.8-rc5/source/include/linux/time64.h#L43
I also could check, with "busybox ls", that if I cross the 2038-01-19
03:14:07 date barrier, all the new files I create on an ext2 filesystem
stick to that date, instead of rolling over to 1901 as I expected.
That's better :)
Cheers
Michael.
--
Michael Opdenacker, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-21 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-21 9:33 Why isn't ext2 deprecated over ext4? Michael Opdenacker
2024-02-21 10:33 ` Reindl Harald
2024-02-21 11:00 ` Jan Kara
2024-02-21 11:39 ` Reindl Harald
2024-02-21 15:48 ` Theodore Ts'o
2024-02-21 22:57 ` Reindl Harald
2024-02-22 20:12 ` Theodore Ts'o
2024-02-21 16:29 ` Michael Opdenacker [this message]
2024-02-21 16:58 ` Jan Kara
2024-02-21 21:11 ` Theodore Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=192cb320-2ded-4761-b0c9-3e273931f6f6@bootlin.com \
--to=michael.opdenacker@bootlin.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).