From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 166/167] ext4: unsigned int compared against zero
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 12:25:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190903162519.7136-166-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190903162519.7136-1-sashal@kernel.org>
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
[ Upstream commit fbbbbd2f28aec991f3fbc248df211550fbdfd58c ]
There are two cases where u32 variables n and err are being checked
for less than zero error values, the checks is always false because
the variables are not signed. Fix this by making the variables ints.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Unsigned compared against 0")
Fixes: 345c0dbf3a30 ("ext4: protect journal inode's blocks using block_validity")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
fs/ext4/block_validity.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/block_validity.c b/fs/ext4/block_validity.c
index cd7129b622f85..e8e27cdc2f677 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/block_validity.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/block_validity.c
@@ -142,7 +142,8 @@ static int ext4_protect_reserved_inode(struct super_block *sb, u32 ino)
struct inode *inode;
struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
struct ext4_map_blocks map;
- u32 i = 0, err = 0, num, n;
+ u32 i = 0, num;
+ int err = 0, n;
if ((ino < EXT4_ROOT_INO) ||
(ino > le32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_inodes_count)))
--
2.20.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-03 16:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20190903162519.7136-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2019-09-03 16:24 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 097/167] ext4: protect journal inode's blocks using block_validity Sasha Levin
2019-09-03 16:25 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 164/167] ext4: don't perform block validity checks on the journal inode Sasha Levin
2019-09-03 16:25 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 165/167] ext4: fix block validity checks for journal inodes using indirect blocks Sasha Levin
2019-09-03 16:25 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190903162519.7136-166-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).