From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
"Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] fs/xfs: Allow toggle of physical DAX flag
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 15:49:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191021224931.GA25526@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191021004536.GD8015@dread.disaster.area>
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 11:45:36AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 08:59:35AM -0700, ira.weiny@intel.com wrote:
> > @@ -1232,12 +1233,10 @@ xfs_diflags_to_linux(
> > inode->i_flags |= S_NOATIME;
> > else
> > inode->i_flags &= ~S_NOATIME;
> > -#if 0 /* disabled until the flag switching races are sorted out */
> > if (xflags & FS_XFLAG_DAX)
> > inode->i_flags |= S_DAX;
> > else
> > inode->i_flags &= ~S_DAX;
> > -#endif
>
> This code has bit-rotted. See xfs_setup_iops(), where we now have a
> different inode->i_mapping->a_ops for DAX inodes.
:-(
>
> That, fundamentally, is the issue here - it's not setting/clearing
> the DAX flag that is the issue, it's doing a swap of the
> mapping->a_ops while there may be other code using that ops
> structure.
>
> IOWs, if there is any code anywhere in the kernel that
> calls an address space op without holding one of the three locks we
> hold here (i_rwsem, MMAPLOCK, ILOCK) then it can race with the swap
> of the address space operations.
>
> By limiting the address space swap to file sizes of zero, we rule
> out the page fault path (mmap of a zero length file segv's with an
> access beyond EOF on the first read/write page fault, right?).
Yes I checked that and thought we were safe here...
> However, other aops callers that might run unlocked and do the wrong
> thing if the aops pointer is swapped between check of the aop method
> existing and actually calling it even if the file size is zero?
>
> A quick look shows that FIBMAP (ioctl_fibmap())) looks susceptible
> to such a race condition with the current definitions of the XFS DAX
> aops. I'm guessing there will be others, but I haven't looked
> further than this...
I'll check for others and think on what to do about this. ext4 will have the
same problem I think. :-(
I don't suppose using a single a_ops for both DAX and non-DAX is palatable?
>
> > /* lock, flush and invalidate mapping in preparation for flag change */
> > xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL | XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL);
> > +
> > + if (i_size_read(inode) != 0) {
> > + error = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > + goto out_unlock;
> > + }
>
> Wrong error. Should be the same as whatever is returned when we try
> to change the extent size hint and can't because the file is
> non-zero in length (-EINVAL, I think). Also needs a comment
> explainging why this check exists, and probably better written as
> i_size_read() > 0 ....
Done, done, and done.
Thank you,
Ira
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
> --
> Dave Chinner
> david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-21 22:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-20 15:59 [PATCH 0/5] Enable per-file/directory DAX operations ira.weiny
2019-10-20 15:59 ` [PATCH 1/5] fs/stat: Define DAX statx attribute ira.weiny
2019-10-22 11:32 ` Boaz Harrosh
2019-10-22 16:51 ` Ira Weiny
2019-10-20 15:59 ` [PATCH 2/5] fs/xfs: Isolate the physical DAX flag from effective ira.weiny
2019-10-21 0:26 ` Dave Chinner
2019-10-21 17:40 ` Ira Weiny
2019-10-20 15:59 ` [PATCH 3/5] fs/xfs: Separate functionality of xfs_inode_supports_dax() ira.weiny
2019-10-20 15:59 ` [PATCH 4/5] fs/xfs: Clean up DAX support check ira.weiny
2019-10-20 15:59 ` [PATCH 5/5] fs/xfs: Allow toggle of physical DAX flag ira.weiny
2019-10-21 0:45 ` Dave Chinner
2019-10-21 22:49 ` Ira Weiny [this message]
2019-10-21 23:46 ` Dave Chinner
2019-11-08 13:12 ` Jan Kara
2019-11-08 13:46 ` Jan Kara
2019-11-08 19:36 ` Ira Weiny
2019-11-11 16:07 ` Jan Kara
2019-11-11 23:54 ` Ira Weiny
2019-10-22 11:21 ` [PATCH 0/5] Enable per-file/directory DAX operations Boaz Harrosh
2019-10-23 13:09 ` Boaz Harrosh
2019-10-23 22:13 ` Dave Chinner
2019-10-24 2:31 ` Boaz Harrosh
2019-10-24 7:34 ` Dave Chinner
2019-10-24 14:05 ` Boaz Harrosh
2019-10-24 21:35 ` Dave Chinner
2019-10-24 23:29 ` Boaz Harrosh
2019-10-25 0:36 ` Dave Chinner
2019-10-25 1:15 ` Boaz Harrosh
2019-10-25 20:49 ` Ira Weiny
2019-10-27 22:10 ` Dave Chinner
2019-10-31 16:17 ` Ira Weiny
2019-11-01 22:47 ` Dave Chinner
2019-11-02 4:25 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191021224931.GA25526@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com \
--to=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).