From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=YMbR=ZL=vger.kernel.org=linux-ext4-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27675C432C0
	for <linux-ext4@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 10:00:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09B4C2075E
	for <linux-ext4@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 10:00:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1726351AbfKSKAc (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-ext4@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 19 Nov 2019 05:00:32 -0500
Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:51788 "EHLO
        Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1725280AbfKSKAc (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>); Tue, 19 Nov 2019 05:00:32 -0500
Received: from bigeasy by Galois.linutronix.de with local (Exim 4.80)
        (envelope-from <bigeasy@linutronix.de>)
        id 1iX0J4-0001IV-GE; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 11:00:22 +0100
Date:   Tue, 19 Nov 2019 11:00:22 +0100
From:   Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To:     Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Julia Cartwright <julia@ni.com>, Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>, Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>,
        Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] fs/buffer: Make BH_Uptodate_Lock bit_spin_lock a
 regular spinlock_t
Message-ID: <20191119100022.xjvwxwepa4xqcr7q@linutronix.de>
References: <20190820170818.oldsdoumzashhcgh@linutronix.de>
 <20190820171721.GA4949@bombadil.infradead.org>
 <alpine.DEB.2.21.1908201959240.2223@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
 <20191011112525.7dksg6ixb5c3hxn5@linutronix.de>
 <20191115145638.GA5461@quack2.suse.cz>
 <20191115175420.cotwwz5tmcwvllsq@linutronix.de>
 <20191118093845.GB17319@quack2.suse.cz>
 <20191118132824.rclhrbujqh4b4g4d@linutronix.de>
 <20191119093001.GA25605@quack2.suse.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20191119093001.GA25605@quack2.suse.cz>
Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org

On 2019-11-19 10:30:01 [+0100], Jan Kara wrote:
> OK, how do we push this? Do you plan to push this through tip tree?

Is it reasonable to push this via the ext4 tree?

> 								Honza

Sebastian