linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@google.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
	Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>,
	linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com, Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] f2fs: Handle casefolding with Encryption
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2019 09:17:15 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201912050955.3f2DMo5g%lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191203051049.44573-6-drosen@google.com>

Hi Daniel,

Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on linus/master]
[also build test WARNING on next-20191202 next-20191204]
[cannot apply to ext4/dev f2fs/dev-test v5.4 v5.4-rc8 v5.4-rc7 v5.4]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Daniel-Rosenberg/Support-for-Casefolding-and-Encryption/20191203-131410
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git 76bb8b05960c3d1668e6bee7624ed886cbd135ba
reproduce:
        # apt-get install sparse
        # sparse version: v0.6.1-91-g817270f-dirty
        make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
        make C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__'

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>


sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)

>> fs/f2fs/dir.c:205:13: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) @@    expected int len @@    got restricted __le16 [usertyint len @@
>> fs/f2fs/dir.c:205:13: sparse:    expected int len
   fs/f2fs/dir.c:205:13: sparse:    got restricted __le16 [usertype] name_len
--
>> fs/f2fs/hash.c:90:27: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) @@    expected restricted __le32 [usertype] f2fs_hash @@    got __le32 [usertype] f2fs_hash @@
>> fs/f2fs/hash.c:90:27: sparse:    expected restricted __le32 [usertype] f2fs_hash
>> fs/f2fs/hash.c:90:27: sparse:    got unsigned long long
   fs/f2fs/hash.c:133:24: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in return expression (different base types) @@    expected restricted __le32 @@    got e32 @@
   fs/f2fs/hash.c:133:24: sparse:    expected restricted __le32
   fs/f2fs/hash.c:133:24: sparse:    got int
   fs/f2fs/hash.c:141:11: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) @@    expected int r @@    got restricted __int r @@
   fs/f2fs/hash.c:141:11: sparse:    expected int r
   fs/f2fs/hash.c:141:11: sparse:    got restricted __le32
   fs/f2fs/hash.c:144:16: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in return expression (different base types) @@    expected restricted __le32 @@    got le32 @@
   fs/f2fs/hash.c:144:16: sparse:    expected restricted __le32
   fs/f2fs/hash.c:144:16: sparse:    got int r

vim +205 fs/f2fs/dir.c

   199	
   200		if (de->hash_code != namehash)
   201			return false;
   202	
   203	#ifdef CONFIG_UNICODE
   204		name = d->filename[bit_pos];
 > 205		len = de->name_len;
   206	
   207		if (sb->s_encoding && needs_casefold(parent)) {
   208			if (cf_str->name) {
   209				struct qstr cf = {.name = cf_str->name,
   210						  .len = cf_str->len};
   211				return !f2fs_ci_compare(parent, &cf, name, len, true);
   212			}
   213			return !f2fs_ci_compare(parent, fname->usr_fname, name, len,
   214						false);
   215		}
   216	#endif
   217		if (fscrypt_match_name(fname, d->filename[bit_pos],
   218					le16_to_cpu(de->name_len)))
   219			return true;
   220		return false;
   221	}
   222	

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                 Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org Intel Corporation

  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-05  1:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-03  5:10 [PATCH 0/8] Support for Casefolding and Encryption Daniel Rosenberg
2019-12-03  5:10 ` [PATCH 1/8] fscrypt: Add siphash and hash key for policy v2 Daniel Rosenberg
2019-12-03 23:25   ` Eric Biggers
2019-12-03  5:10 ` [PATCH 2/8] fscrypt: Don't allow v1 policies with casefolding Daniel Rosenberg
2019-12-03 23:37   ` Eric Biggers
2019-12-03  5:10 ` [PATCH 3/8] fscrypt: Change format of no-key token Daniel Rosenberg
2019-12-04  0:09   ` Eric Biggers
2019-12-03  5:10 ` [PATCH 4/8] vfs: Fold casefolding into vfs Daniel Rosenberg
2019-12-03  7:41   ` Gao Xiang
2019-12-03 19:42     ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2019-12-03 20:34       ` Eric Biggers
2019-12-03 21:21         ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2019-12-04  0:32           ` Eric Biggers
2019-12-03 19:31   ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2020-01-03 20:26   ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2019-12-03  5:10 ` [PATCH 5/8] f2fs: Handle casefolding with Encryption Daniel Rosenberg
2019-12-05  1:17   ` kbuild test robot [this message]
2019-12-03  5:10 ` [PATCH 6/8] ext4: Use struct super_block's casefold data Daniel Rosenberg
2019-12-03 19:44   ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2019-12-03  5:10 ` [PATCH 7/8] ext4: Hande casefolding with encryption Daniel Rosenberg
2019-12-03  5:10 ` [PATCH 8/8] ext4: Optimize match for casefolded encrypted dirs Daniel Rosenberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201912050955.3f2DMo5g%lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=drosen@google.com \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=krisman@collabora.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).