linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	jack@suse.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu,
	adilger.kernel@dilger.ca
Subject: Re: ext4 warnings: extent tree (at level 2) could be narrower.
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 15:37:55 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191213233754.GA99863@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191213230226.GA11066@duo.ucw.cz>

On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 12:02:26AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> Periodic fsck kicked in on x86-32 machine. I did partial update in the
> meantime, and was running various kernels including -next... Now I'm
> getting:
> 
> data: Inode 1840310 extent tree (at level 2) could be narrower. IGNORED.
> 
> on 5 inodes.  Is it harmless, or does it mean I was running buggy
> kernel in the past, or...?

That message means that e2fsck has found that the extent tree could be
smaller than it actually is; the lack of any other complaints about the
extent tree mean that it's ok.

The kernel cannot shrink the extent tree on its own (but e2fsck can), so
this message is where e2fsck would have applied that optimization.

IOWs: mostly harmless, but the kernel was (and still is) a bit deficient.

--D

> Best regards,
> 									Pavel
> 
> -- 
> (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
> (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html



      reply	other threads:[~2019-12-13 23:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-13 23:02 ext4 warnings: extent tree (at level 2) could be narrower Pavel Machek
2019-12-13 23:37 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191213233754.GA99863@magnolia \
    --to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=jack@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).