Linux-ext4 Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	"Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V2 07/12] fs: Add locking for a dynamic inode 'mode'
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 17:03:22 -0800
Message-ID: <20200114010322.GS8247@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200114002005.GA29860@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com>

On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 04:20:05PM -0800, Ira Weiny wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 02:12:18PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 11:29:37AM -0800, ira.weiny@intel.com wrote:
> > > From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > >  
> > >  The File Object
> > >  ---------------
> > > @@ -437,6 +459,8 @@ As of kernel 2.6.22, the following members are defined:
> > >  		int (*atomic_open)(struct inode *, struct dentry *, struct file *,
> > >  				   unsigned open_flag, umode_t create_mode);
> > >  		int (*tmpfile) (struct inode *, struct dentry *, umode_t);
> > > +		void (*lock_mode)(struct inode *);
> > > +		void (*unlock_mode)(struct inode *);
> > 
> > Yikes.  "mode" has a specific meaning for inodes, and this lock isn't
> > related to i_mode.  This lock protects aops from changing while an
> > address space operation is in use.
> 
> Ah...  yea ok mode is a bad name.
> 
> > 
> > >  	};
> > >  
> > >  Again, all methods are called without any locks being held, unless
> > > @@ -584,6 +608,12 @@ otherwise noted.
> > >  	atomically creating, opening and unlinking a file in given
> > >  	directory.
> > >  
> > > +``lock_mode``
> > > +	called to prevent operations which depend on the inode's mode from
> > > +        proceeding should a mode change be in progress
> > 
> > "Inodes can't change mode, because files do not suddenly become
> > directories". ;)
> 
> Yea sorry.
> 
> > 
> > Oh, you meant "lock_XXXX is called to prevent a change in the pagecache
> > mode from proceeding while there are address space operations in
> > progress".  So these are really more aops get and put functions...
> 
> At first I actually did have aops get/put functions but this is really
> protecting more than the aops vector because as Christoph said there are file
> operations which need to be protected not just address space operations.
> 
> But I agree "mode" is a bad name...  Sorry...

inode_fops_{get,set}(), then?

inode_start_fileop()
inode_end_fileop() ?

Trying to avoid sounding foppish <COUGH>

> > 
> > > +``unlock_mode``
> > > +	called when critical mode dependent operation is complete
> > >  
> > >  The Address Space Object
> > >  ========================
> > > diff --git a/fs/ioctl.c b/fs/ioctl.c
> > > index 7c9a5df5a597..ed6ab5303a24 100644
> > > --- a/fs/ioctl.c
> > > +++ b/fs/ioctl.c
> > > @@ -55,18 +55,29 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(vfs_ioctl);
> > >  static int ioctl_fibmap(struct file *filp, int __user *p)
> > >  {
> > >  	struct address_space *mapping = filp->f_mapping;
> > > +	struct inode *inode = filp->f_inode;
> > >  	int res, block;
> > >  
> > > +	lock_inode_mode(inode);
> > > +
> > >  	/* do we support this mess? */
> > > -	if (!mapping->a_ops->bmap)
> > > -		return -EINVAL;
> > > -	if (!capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO))
> > > -		return -EPERM;
> > > +	if (!mapping->a_ops->bmap) {
> > > +		res = -EINVAL;
> > > +		goto out;
> > > +	}
> > > +	if (!capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO)) {
> > > +		res = -EPERM;
> > > +		goto out;
> > 
> > Why does the order of these checks change here?
> 
> I don't understand?  The order does not change we just can't return without
> releasing the lock.  And to protect against bmap changing the lock needs to be
> taken first.

Doh.  -ENOCOFFEE, I plead.

--D

> [snip]
> 
> > >  
> > > +static inline void lock_inode_mode(struct inode *inode)
> > 
> > inode_aops_get()?
> 
> Let me think on this.  This is not just getting a reference to the aops vector.
> It is more than that...  and inode_get is not right either!  ;-P
> 
> > 
> > > +{
> > > +	WARN_ON_ONCE(inode->i_op->lock_mode &&
> > > +		     !inode->i_op->unlock_mode);
> > > +	if (inode->i_op->lock_mode)
> > > +		inode->i_op->lock_mode(inode);
> > > +}
> > > +static inline void unlock_inode_mode(struct inode *inode)
> > > +{
> > > +	WARN_ON_ONCE(inode->i_op->unlock_mode &&
> > > +		     !inode->i_op->lock_mode);
> > > +	if (inode->i_op->unlock_mode)
> > > +		inode->i_op->unlock_mode(inode);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  static inline ssize_t call_read_iter(struct file *file, struct kiocb *kio,
> > >  				     struct iov_iter *iter)
> > 
> > inode_aops_put()?
> 
> ...  something like that but not 'aops'...
> 
> Ira
> 
> > 
> > --D
> > 

  reply index

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-10 19:29 [RFC PATCH V2 00/12] Enable per-file/directory DAX operations V2 ira.weiny
2020-01-10 19:29 ` [RFC PATCH V2 01/12] fs/stat: Define DAX statx attribute ira.weiny
2020-01-15 11:37   ` Jan Kara
2020-01-15 17:38     ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-15 19:45       ` Ira Weiny
2020-01-15 20:10         ` Dan Williams
2020-01-15 22:38           ` Ira Weiny
2020-01-16  5:39             ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-16  6:05               ` Dan Williams
2020-01-16  6:18                 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-16  6:25                   ` Dan Williams
2020-01-18  9:11                 ` Dave Chinner
2020-01-16 17:55               ` Ira Weiny
2020-01-16 18:04                 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-16 18:52                   ` Ira Weiny
2020-01-16 22:19                     ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-17 11:58                     ` Jan Kara
2020-01-10 19:29 ` [RFC PATCH V2 02/12] fs/xfs: Isolate the physical DAX flag from effective ira.weiny
2020-01-10 19:29 ` [RFC PATCH V2 03/12] fs/xfs: Separate functionality of xfs_inode_supports_dax() ira.weiny
2020-01-10 19:29 ` [RFC PATCH V2 04/12] fs/xfs: Clean up DAX support check ira.weiny
2020-01-10 19:29 ` [RFC PATCH V2 05/12] fs: remove unneeded IS_DAX() check ira.weiny
2020-01-16  9:38   ` Jan Kara
2020-01-16 18:47     ` Ira Weiny
2020-01-10 19:29 ` [RFC PATCH V2 06/12] fs/xfs: Check if the inode supports DAX under lock ira.weiny
2020-01-10 19:29 ` [RFC PATCH V2 07/12] fs: Add locking for a dynamic inode 'mode' ira.weiny
2020-01-13 22:12   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-14  0:20     ` Ira Weiny
2020-01-14  1:03       ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2020-01-15 19:08         ` Ira Weiny
2020-01-16  5:40           ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-16 18:54             ` Ira Weiny
2020-01-10 19:29 ` [RFC PATCH V2 08/12] fs/xfs: Add lock/unlock mode to xfs ira.weiny
2020-01-13 22:19   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-14  0:35     ` Ira Weiny
2020-01-15  0:57       ` Ira Weiny
2020-01-15 23:52     ` Ira Weiny
2020-01-16  9:24   ` Jan Kara
2020-01-16 19:12     ` Ira Weiny
2020-01-10 19:29 ` [RFC PATCH V2 09/12] fs: Prevent mode change if file is mmap'ed ira.weiny
2020-01-13 22:22   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-14  0:46     ` Ira Weiny
2020-01-14  1:30       ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-14 17:53         ` Ira Weiny
2020-01-15 11:34           ` Jan Kara
2020-01-15 18:24             ` Ira Weiny
2020-01-15 10:21   ` David Laight
2020-01-15 17:53     ` Ira Weiny
2020-01-10 19:29 ` [RFC PATCH V2 10/12] fs/xfs: Fix truncate up ira.weiny
2020-01-13 22:27   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-14  0:40     ` Ira Weiny
2020-01-14  1:14       ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-14 19:00         ` Ira Weiny
2020-01-14 19:39           ` Ira Weiny
2020-01-10 19:29 ` [RFC PATCH V2 11/12] fs/xfs: Clean up locking in dax invalidate ira.weiny
2020-01-10 19:29 ` [RFC PATCH V2 12/12] fs/xfs: Allow toggle of effective DAX flag ira.weiny

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200114010322.GS8247@magnolia \
    --to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux-ext4 Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/0 linux-ext4/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-ext4 linux-ext4/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4 \
		linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index linux-ext4

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-ext4


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git