linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
	Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] fs: avoid double-writing the inode on a lazytime expiration
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 16:01:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200325150108.GA14435@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200325122825.1086872-3-hch@lst.de>

On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 01:28:23PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> --- a/fs/ext4/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
> @@ -1448,6 +1448,11 @@ static struct dquot **ext4_get_dquots(struct inode *inode)
>  	return EXT4_I(inode)->i_dquot;
>  }
>  
> +static void ext4_lazytime_expired(struct inode *inode)
> +{
> +	return ext4_dirty_inode(inode, I_DIRTY_SYNC);
> +}

FYI: this is inside an #ifdef CONFIG_QUOTA, so I'll have to respin even
if the overall approach looks good.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-25 15:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-25 12:28 lazytime fixes Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-25 12:28 ` [PATCH 1/4] ubifs: remove broken lazytime support Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-25 15:51   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2020-03-25 12:28 ` [PATCH 2/4] fs: avoid double-writing the inode on a lazytime expiration Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-25 15:01   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2020-03-26  3:22   ` Dave Chinner
2020-03-26 17:01     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-25 12:28 ` [PATCH 3/4] fs: don't call ->dirty_inode for lazytime timestamp updates Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-25 12:28 ` [PATCH 4/4] fs: clean up generic_update_time a bit Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200325150108.GA14435@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).