From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DEDFC433E0 for ; Mon, 25 May 2020 06:52:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77D81206B6 for ; Mon, 25 May 2020 06:52:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388861AbgEYGwh (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 May 2020 02:52:37 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:39448 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2388487AbgEYGwh (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 May 2020 02:52:37 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 8BF7968C4E; Mon, 25 May 2020 08:52:34 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 08:52:34 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" Cc: Al Viro , Christoph Hellwig , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, adilger@dilger.ca, riteshh@linux.ibm.com, amir73il@gmail.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: fiemap cleanups v4 Message-ID: <20200525065234.GB25599@lst.de> References: <20200523073016.2944131-1-hch@lst.de> <20200523155216.GZ23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20200524191713.GA228632@mit.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200524191713.GA228632@mit.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 03:17:13PM -0400, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote: > > Hmmm... I can do an immutable shared branch, no problem. What would > > you prefer for a branchpoint for that one? > > I thought we had already agreed to run these patches through the ext4 > git tree, since most of the changes affect the ext4 tree (and there > aren't any other iomap fiemap changes pending as far as I know). > > The v3 versions of these patches have been part of the ext4 dev tree > since May 19th. Since the ext4 dev tree is rewinding, I can easily > update it fiemap-fixes patch to be on top of the first two patches > which Linus has already accepted, and then merge it into the ext4 dev > branch. I think we're all fine and set, unless Al really needs a shared branch. Based on what is in linux-next and out on the lists I don't see any real need, though.