From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com>
Cc: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] add support for direct I/O with fscrypt using blk-crypto
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 17:56:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200721005602.GE7464@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200720233739.824943-1-satyat@google.com>
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 11:37:32PM +0000, Satya Tangirala wrote:
> This patch series adds support for direct I/O with fscrypt using
> blk-crypto. It has been rebased on fscrypt/master.
>
> Patch 1 adds two functions to fscrypt that need to be called to determine
> if direct I/O is supported for a request.
>
> Patches 2 and 3 wire up direct-io and iomap respectively with the functions
> introduced in Patch 1 and set bio crypt contexts on bios when appropriate
> by calling into fscrypt.
>
> Patches 4 and 5 allow ext4 and f2fs direct I/O to support fscrypt without
> falling back to buffered I/O.
>
> Patches 6 and 7 update the fscrypt documentation for inline encryption
> support and direct I/O. The documentation now notes the required conditions
> for inline encryption and direct I/O on encrypted files.
>
> This patch series was tested by running xfstests with test_dummy_encryption
> with and without the 'inlinecrypt' mount option, and there were no
> meaningful regressions. One regression was for generic/587 on ext4,
> but that test isn't compatible with test_dummy_encryption in the first
> place, and the test "incorrectly" passes without the 'inlinecrypt' mount
> option - a patch will be sent out to exclude that test when
> test_dummy_encryption is turned on with ext4 (like the other quota related
> tests that use user visible quota files). The other regression was for
> generic/252 on ext4, which does direct I/O with a buffer aligned to the
> block device's blocksize, but not necessarily aligned to the filesystem's
> block size, which direct I/O with fscrypt requires.
>
This patch series looks good to me now. Can the ext4, f2fs, and iomap
maintainers take a look?
- Eric
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-21 0:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-20 23:37 [PATCH v4 0/7] add support for direct I/O with fscrypt using blk-crypto Satya Tangirala
2020-07-20 23:37 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] fscrypt: Add functions for direct I/O support Satya Tangirala
2020-07-22 17:04 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2020-07-20 23:37 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] direct-io: add support for fscrypt using blk-crypto Satya Tangirala
2020-07-22 17:05 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2020-07-20 23:37 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] iomap: support direct I/O with " Satya Tangirala
2020-07-22 17:06 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2020-07-22 21:16 ` Dave Chinner
2020-07-22 22:34 ` Eric Biggers
2020-07-22 22:44 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-07-22 23:12 ` Eric Biggers
2020-07-22 23:26 ` Eric Biggers
2020-07-22 23:32 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-07-22 23:43 ` Eric Biggers
2020-07-23 22:07 ` Dave Chinner
2020-07-23 23:03 ` Eric Biggers
2020-07-24 1:39 ` Dave Chinner
2020-07-24 3:46 ` Eric Biggers
2020-07-24 5:31 ` Dave Chinner
2020-07-24 17:41 ` Eric Biggers
2020-07-25 23:47 ` Dave Chinner
2020-07-25 23:59 ` Dave Chinner
2020-07-26 2:42 ` Eric Biggers
2020-07-27 17:16 ` Eric Biggers
2020-07-20 23:37 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] ext4: " Satya Tangirala
2020-07-22 17:07 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2020-07-20 23:37 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] f2fs: " Satya Tangirala
2020-07-21 20:11 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2020-07-20 23:37 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] fscrypt: document inline encryption support Satya Tangirala
2020-07-22 17:01 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2020-07-20 23:37 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] fscrypt: update documentation for direct I/O support Satya Tangirala
2020-07-21 0:47 ` Eric Biggers
2020-07-22 16:57 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2020-07-21 0:56 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200721005602.GE7464@sol.localdomain \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=satyat@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).