linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Ted Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>, Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 2/6] ext4: Don't allow overlapping system zones
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 13:44:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200727114429.1478-3-jack@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200727114429.1478-1-jack@suse.cz>

Currently, add_system_zone() just silently merges two added system zones
that overlap. However the overlap should not happen and it generally
suggests that some unrelated metadata overlap which indicates the fs is
corrupted. We should have caught such problems earlier (e.g. in
ext4_check_descriptors()) but add this check as another line of defense.
In later patch we also use this for stricter checking of journal inode
extent tree.

Reviewed-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
 fs/ext4/block_validity.c | 36 +++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/block_validity.c b/fs/ext4/block_validity.c
index 16e9b2fda03a..b394a50ebbe3 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/block_validity.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/block_validity.c
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ static int add_system_zone(struct ext4_system_blocks *system_blks,
 			   ext4_fsblk_t start_blk,
 			   unsigned int count)
 {
-	struct ext4_system_zone *new_entry = NULL, *entry;
+	struct ext4_system_zone *new_entry, *entry;
 	struct rb_node **n = &system_blks->root.rb_node, *node;
 	struct rb_node *parent = NULL, *new_node = NULL;
 
@@ -79,30 +79,20 @@ static int add_system_zone(struct ext4_system_blocks *system_blks,
 			n = &(*n)->rb_left;
 		else if (start_blk >= (entry->start_blk + entry->count))
 			n = &(*n)->rb_right;
-		else {
-			if (start_blk + count > (entry->start_blk +
-						 entry->count))
-				entry->count = (start_blk + count -
-						entry->start_blk);
-			new_node = *n;
-			new_entry = rb_entry(new_node, struct ext4_system_zone,
-					     node);
-			break;
-		}
+		else	/* Unexpected overlap of system zones. */
+			return -EFSCORRUPTED;
 	}
 
-	if (!new_entry) {
-		new_entry = kmem_cache_alloc(ext4_system_zone_cachep,
-					     GFP_KERNEL);
-		if (!new_entry)
-			return -ENOMEM;
-		new_entry->start_blk = start_blk;
-		new_entry->count = count;
-		new_node = &new_entry->node;
-
-		rb_link_node(new_node, parent, n);
-		rb_insert_color(new_node, &system_blks->root);
-	}
+	new_entry = kmem_cache_alloc(ext4_system_zone_cachep,
+				     GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!new_entry)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	new_entry->start_blk = start_blk;
+	new_entry->count = count;
+	new_node = &new_entry->node;
+
+	rb_link_node(new_node, parent, n);
+	rb_insert_color(new_node, &system_blks->root);
 
 	/* Can we merge to the left? */
 	node = rb_prev(new_node);
-- 
2.16.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-07-27 11:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-27 11:44 [PATCH 0/6 v2] ext4: Check journal inode extents more carefully Jan Kara
2020-07-27 11:44 ` [PATCH 1/6] ext4: Handle error of ext4_setup_system_zone() on remount Jan Kara
2020-07-27 11:44 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2020-07-27 11:44 ` [PATCH 3/6] ext4: Check journal inode extents more carefully Jan Kara
2020-07-28  9:10   ` luomeng
2020-07-28 12:56     ` Jan Kara
2020-07-27 11:44 ` [PATCH 4/6] ext4: Fold ext4_data_block_valid_rcu() into the caller Jan Kara
2020-07-27 11:44 ` [PATCH 5/6] ext4: Handle add_system_zone() failure in ext4_setup_system_zone() Jan Kara
2020-07-27 12:39   ` Lukas Czerner
2020-07-27 11:44 ` [PATCH 6/6] ext4: Correctly restore system zone info when remount fails Jan Kara
2020-07-27 12:43   ` Lukas Czerner
2020-07-28 13:04 [PATCH 0/6 v3] ext4: Check journal inode extents more carefully Jan Kara
2020-07-28 13:04 ` [PATCH 2/6] ext4: Don't allow overlapping system zones Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200727114429.1478-3-jack@suse.cz \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=lczerner@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).