linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.com,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu
Subject: Re: More KCSAN data-race Reports
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 13:31:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210412113158.GA4679@quack2.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACkBjsYuWeJNYTGUhBVszgiUVOrMdEZ=qcmDtEk97BEtm4ggSA@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon 12-04-21 18:42:58, Hao Sun wrote:
> Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> 于2021年4月12日周一 下午5:02写道:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Sun 11-04-21 11:42:05, Hao Sun wrote:
> > > Since the last KCSAN report[1], I found two more KCSAN reports that
> > > Syzbot had not reported.
> > > Not sure if they are valid bugs, I hope the stack information in
> > > reports can help you locate the problem.
> > > Kernel config can be found in the attachment.
> >
> > Do we have symbolic decoding of the traces below? Because involved
> > functions are really big so it's difficult to guess what KCSAN is
> > complaining about... At least I wasn't able to guess it after looking into
> > the stacktraces for a while.
> >
> Sorry, the log processing module of Fuzzer still has some logic bugs,
> only some of the symbolized reports are stored in the disk.
> Interestingly, however, the read-write end that causes data racing in
> both reports are in the same location (fs/jbd2/commit.c:443), and this
> information should help locate the problem.
> 
> Partial symbolized report 1:
> ==================================================================
> BUG: KCSAN: data-race in ext4_mark_iloc_dirty / jbd2_journal_commit_transaction
> read-write to 0xffff88804451d800 of 8 bytes by task 4821 on cpu 1:
>  jbd2_journal_commit_transaction+0x222/0x3200 fs/jbd2/commit.c:443
>  kjournald2+0x253/0x470 fs/jbd2/journal.c:213
>  kthread+0x1f0/0x220 kernel/kthread.c:292
>  ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:294

OK, that is:
	journal->j_flags |= JBD2_FULL_COMMIT_ONGOING;

So likely this is a complaint about j_flags update vs j_flags check race
(we check for JBD2_ABORT flag) all around the code.

So again this is harmless unless the compiler plays some devilish tricks
and doesn't store bogus intermediate values in j_flags during RMW
operations. Not sure how to deal with this one. Just putting data_race()
here doesn't seem right - if the compiler does something unexpected, we are
indeed in trouble. Maybe using bitops for j_flags would be beneficial for
other reasons as well as silencing KCSAN. But it needs more thought.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

      reply	other threads:[~2021-04-12 11:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-11  3:42 More KCSAN data-race Reports Hao Sun
2021-04-12  9:02 ` Jan Kara
2021-04-12 10:42   ` Hao Sun
2021-04-12 11:31     ` Jan Kara [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210412113158.GA4679@quack2.suse.cz \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jack@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sunhao.th@gmail.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).