From: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 00/10] ext4: Improve FC trace events
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 07:49:31 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220311021931.d4oozgtefbalrcch@riteshh-domain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220310193936.38ae7754@gandalf.local.home>
On 22/03/10 07:39PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 22:37:31 +0530
> Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > On 22/03/10 11:05AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 21:28:54 +0530
> > > Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Note:- I still couldn't figure out how to expose EXT4_FC_REASON_MAX in patch-2
> > > > which (I think) might be (only) needed by trace-cmd or perf record for trace_ext4_fc_stats.
> > > > But it seems "cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace_pipe" gives the right output
> > > > for ext4_fc_stats trace event (as shown below).
> > > >
> > > > So with above reasoning, do you think we should take these patches in?
> > > > And we can later see how to provide EXT4_FC_REASON_MAX definition available to
> > > > libtraceevent?
> > >
> > > I don't see EXT4_FC_REASON_MAX being used in the TP_printk(). If it isn't
> > > used there, it doesn't need to be exposed. Or did I miss something?
> >
> > I was mentioning about EXT4_FC_REASON_MAX used in TP_STRUCT__entry.
> > When I hard code EXT4_FC_REASON_MAX to 9 in TP_STRUCT__entry, I could
> > see proper values using trace-cmd. Otherwise I see all 0 (when using trace-cmd
> > or perf record).
> >
> > + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> > + __field(dev_t, dev)
> > + __array(unsigned int, fc_ineligible_rc, EXT4_FC_REASON_MAX)
>
> Ah, I bet it's showing up in the format portion and not the print fmt part
> of the format file.
>
> Just to confirm, can you do the following:
>
> # cat /sys/kernel/tracing/events/ext4/ext4_fc_commit_stop/format
I think you meant ext4_fc_stats.
>
> and show me what it outputs.
root@qemu:/home/qemu# cat /sys/kernel/tracing/events/ext4/ext4_fc_stats/format
name: ext4_fc_stats
ID: 986
format:
field:unsigned short common_type; offset:0; size:2; signed:0;
field:unsigned char common_flags; offset:2; size:1; signed:0;
field:unsigned char common_preempt_count; offset:3; size:1; signed:0;
field:int common_pid; offset:4; size:4; signed:1;
field:dev_t dev; offset:8; size:4; signed:0;
field:unsigned int fc_ineligible_rc[EXT4_FC_REASON_MAX]; offset:12; size:36; signed:0;
field:unsigned long fc_commits; offset:48; size:8; signed:0;
field:unsigned long fc_ineligible_commits; offset:56; size:8; signed:0;
field:unsigned long fc_numblks; offset:64; size:8; signed:0;
print fmt: "dev %d,%d fc ineligible reasons:
%s:%u, %s:%u, %s:%u, %s:%u, %s:%u, %s:%u, %s:%u, %s:%u, %s:%u num_commits:%lu, ineligible: %lu, numblks: %lu", ((unsigned int) ((REC->dev) >> 20)), ((unsigned int) ((REC->dev) & ((1U << 20) - 1))), __print_symbolic(0, { 0, "XATTR"}, { 1, "CROSS_RENAME"}, { 2, "JOURNAL_FLAG_CHANGE"}, { 3, "NO_MEM"}, { 4, "SWAP_BOOT"}, { 5, "RESIZE"}, { 6, "RENAME_DIR"}, { 7, "FALLOC_RANGE"}, { 8, "INODE_JOURNAL_DATA"}), REC->fc_ineligible_rc[0], __print_symbolic(1, { 0, "XATTR"}, { 1, "CROSS_RENAME"}, { 2, "JOURNAL_FLAG_CHANGE"}, { 3, "NO_MEM"}, { 4, "SWAP_BOOT"}, { 5, "RESIZE"}, { 6, "RENAME_DIR"}, { 7, "FALLOC_RANGE"}, { 8, "INODE_JOURNAL_DATA"}), REC->fc_ineligible_rc[1], __print_symbolic(2, { 0, "XATTR"}, { 1, "CROSS_RENAME"}, { 2, "JOURNAL_FLAG_CHANGE"}, { 3, "NO_MEM"}, { 4, "SWAP_BOOT"}, { 5, "RESIZE"}, { 6, "RENAME_DIR"}, { 7, "FALLOC_RANGE"}, { 8, "INODE_JOURNAL_DATA"}), REC->fc_ineligible_rc[2], __print_symbolic(3, { 0, "XATTR"}, { 1, "CROSS_RENAME"}, { 2, "JOURNAL_FLAG_CHANGE"}, { 3, "NO_MEM"}, { 4, "SWAP_BOOT"}, { 5, "RESIZE"}, { 6, "RENAME_DIR"}, { 7, "FALLOC_RANGE"}, { 8, "INODE_JOURNAL_DATA"}), REC->fc_ineligible_rc[3], __print_symbolic(4, { 0, "XATTR"}, { 1, "CROSS_RENAME"}, { 2, "JOURNAL_FLAG_CHANGE"}, { 3, "NO_MEM"}, { 4, "SWAP_BOOT"}, { 5, "RESIZE"}, { 6, "RENAME_DIR"}, { 7, "FALLOC_RANGE"}, { 8, "INODE_JOURNAL_DATA"}), REC->fc_ineligible_rc[4], __print_symbolic(5, { 0, "XATTR"}, { 1, "CROSS_RENAME"}, { 2, "JOURNAL_FLAG_CHANGE"}, { 3, "NO_MEM"}, { 4, "SWAP_BOOT"}, { 5, "RESIZE"}, { 6, "RENAME_DIR"}, { 7, "FALLOC_RANGE"}, { 8, "INODE_JOURNAL_DATA"}), REC->fc_ineligible_rc[5], __print_symbolic(6, { 0, "XATTR"}, { 1, "CROSS_RENAME"}, { 2, "JOURNAL_FLAG_CHANGE"}, { 3, "NO_MEM"}, { 4, "SWAP_BOOT"}, { 5, "RESIZE"}, { 6, "RENAME_DIR"}, { 7, "FALLOC_RANGE"}, { 8, "INODE_JOURNAL_DATA"}), REC->fc_ineligible_rc[6], __print_symbolic(7, { 0, "XATTR"}, { 1, "CROSS_RENAME"}, { 2, "JOURNAL_FLAG_CHANGE"}, { 3, "NO_MEM"}, { 4, "SWAP_BOOT"}, { 5, "RESIZE"}, { 6, "RENAME_DIR"}, { 7, "FALLOC_RANGE"}, { 8, "INODE_JOURNAL_DATA"}), REC->fc_ineligible_rc[7], __print_symbolic(8, { 0, "XATTR"}, { 1, "CROSS_RENAME"}, { 2, "JOURNAL_FLAG_CHANGE"}, { 3, "NO_MEM"}, { 4, "SWAP_BOOT"}, { 5, "RESIZE"}, { 6, "RENAME_DIR"}, { 7, "FALLOC_RANGE"}, { 8, "INODE_JOURNAL_DATA"}), REC->fc_ineligible_rc[8], REC->fc_commits, REC->fc_ineligible_commits, REC->fc_numblks
output of ext4_fc_stats (FALLOC_RANGE:0 v/s FALLOC_RANGE:13)
==========================================================================
<perf-report or trace-cmd report>
xfs_io 8336 [003] 42950.923784: ext4:ext4_fc_stats: dev 7,2 fc ineligible reasons:
XATTR:0, CROSS_RENAME:0, JOURNAL_FLAG_CHANGE:0, NO_MEM:0, SWAP_BOOT:0, RESIZE:0, RENAME_DIR:0, FALLOC_RANGE:0, INODE_JOURNAL_DATA:0 num_commits:22, ineligible: 12, numblks: 22
<cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace_pipe>
xfs_io-8336 [003] ..... 42951.224155: ext4_fc_stats: dev 7,2 fc ineligible reasons:
XATTR:0, CROSS_RENAME:0, JOURNAL_FLAG_CHANGE:0, NO_MEM:0, SWAP_BOOT:0, RESIZE:0, RENAME_DIR:0, FALLOC_RANGE:13, INODE_JOURNAL_DATA:0 num_commits:22, ineligible: 12, numblks: 22
Thanks
-ritesh
>
> Thanks,
>
> -- Steve
>
>
> >
> > Should we anyway hard code this to 9. Since we are anyway printing all the
> > 9 elements of array values individually.
> >
> > + TP_printk("dev %d,%d fc ineligible reasons:\n"
> > + "%s:%u, %s:%u, %s:%u, %s:%u, %s:%u, %s:%u, %s:%u, %s:%u, %s:%u "
> > + "num_commits:%lu, ineligible: %lu, numblks: %lu",
> > + MAJOR(__entry->dev), MINOR(__entry->dev),
> > + FC_REASON_NAME_STAT(EXT4_FC_REASON_XATTR),
> > + FC_REASON_NAME_STAT(EXT4_FC_REASON_CROSS_RENAME),
> > + FC_REASON_NAME_STAT(EXT4_FC_REASON_JOURNAL_FLAG_CHANGE),
> > + FC_REASON_NAME_STAT(EXT4_FC_REASON_NOMEM),
> > + FC_REASON_NAME_STAT(EXT4_FC_REASON_SWAP_BOOT),
> > + FC_REASON_NAME_STAT(EXT4_FC_REASON_RESIZE),
> > + FC_REASON_NAME_STAT(EXT4_FC_REASON_RENAME_DIR),
> > + FC_REASON_NAME_STAT(EXT4_FC_REASON_FALLOC_RANGE),
> > + FC_REASON_NAME_STAT(EXT4_FC_REASON_INODE_JOURNAL_DATA),
> > + __entry->fc_commits, __entry->fc_ineligible_commits,
> > + __entry->fc_numblks)
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> > -ritesh
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-11 2:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-10 15:58 [PATCHv2 00/10] ext4: Improve FC trace events Ritesh Harjani
2022-03-10 15:58 ` [PATCHv2 01/10] ext4: Remove unused enum EXT4_FC_COMMIT_FAILED Ritesh Harjani
2022-03-10 15:58 ` [PATCHv2 02/10] ext4: Fix ext4_fc_stats trace point Ritesh Harjani
2022-03-10 15:58 ` [PATCHv2 03/10] ext4: Convert ext4_fc_track_dentry type events to use event class Ritesh Harjani
2022-03-10 15:58 ` [PATCHv2 04/10] ext4: Do not call FC trace event in ext4_fc_commit() if FS does not support FC Ritesh Harjani
2022-03-10 15:58 ` [PATCHv2 05/10] ext4: Return early for non-eligible fast_commit track events Ritesh Harjani
2022-03-10 15:59 ` [PATCHv2 06/10] ext4: Add new trace event in ext4_fc_cleanup Ritesh Harjani
2022-03-10 15:59 ` [PATCHv2 07/10] ext4: Add transaction tid info in fc_track events Ritesh Harjani
2022-03-10 15:59 ` [PATCHv2 08/10] ext4: Add commit_tid info in jbd debug log Ritesh Harjani
2022-03-10 15:59 ` [PATCHv2 09/10] ext4: Add commit tid info in ext4_fc_commit_start/stop trace events Ritesh Harjani
2022-03-10 15:59 ` [PATCHv2 10/10] ext4: Fix remaining two trace events to use same printk convention Ritesh Harjani
2022-03-10 16:05 ` [PATCHv2 00/10] ext4: Improve FC trace events Steven Rostedt
2022-03-10 17:07 ` Ritesh Harjani
2022-03-11 0:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-03-11 2:19 ` Ritesh Harjani [this message]
2022-03-11 2:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-03-11 3:14 ` Ritesh Harjani
2022-03-11 4:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-03-11 5:12 ` Ritesh Harjani
2022-03-11 14:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-03-11 15:03 ` Ritesh Harjani
2022-03-11 16:42 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220311021931.d4oozgtefbalrcch@riteshh-domain \
--to=riteshh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).