From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_MED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC7E1C4332B for ; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 01:34:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B08CE20767 for ; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 01:34:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="kR8z+FlA" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726851AbgCSBe1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Mar 2020 21:34:27 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f67.google.com ([209.85.221.67]:42620 "EHLO mail-wr1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726623AbgCSBe0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Mar 2020 21:34:26 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f67.google.com with SMTP id v11so735247wrm.9 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 18:34:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SuERmyPuhCg3zAVzXBMx4EONeH0JdIBVUoFaYugV9mA=; b=kR8z+FlATtPoIj+aQ/Cy89Vwo9FBzlr32JUtR0aDIEIUOqUtzMq5fHpcd8E2rpuS6+ dlwo5Cj0uj9EtVRtDeNGA3X6zyoExc+GqQbpATXW+qJapAgLPrCVe7M9ppl1pLOAZkGC KZi89teuyoASn7S3TzimXm8IBLagZ9tSPmJUnHOdtmYQfOBtUzDEVbzrATNPO23zFrEC iY1LOrO2dvk1gy1Pd2cBuJDgrV+RZriGEvA7bYPfkWbRQFmolMTVVGitnbu83RZjJ4qd 9yZZcHuPrWvs2grkM/UEuKm4dK9NPvb6Tt5I4v7f+JcSeBI4ZNl7zlhDu73qeDtWXdhr 6rOA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SuERmyPuhCg3zAVzXBMx4EONeH0JdIBVUoFaYugV9mA=; b=iblSM90tCv/Tbwsybgk6l1NH8YonBDJi1Ca+xZxXg2CoXgFTGeJPrCW1YwgnsvrqLY WI8VU5Y7yvTv/Q735pSF9NvMNOpL5vVrVP/p4ifumwpPZn1NYjSSEueK0C6SSreKEgYj pUiPerUYbP4oNZHj1guRoCD6x24pdiCVLUAI+5qzmhOXcgjI7fgG+ViAOI24EJXasfIF UK3+bKWWKo3AeTpRQuXqfat5VqGlfw4XUQVdDYS9KHw/VQ/jyvyZQiDnKaazPGdZdTL6 +a9d5rWD4htfN1v6kqwcf81Zw6WlSmHot65vN9S1RqrbcPYA2KzIn9xqEe9sy0a/5djz ESUQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ0oSTCSIHCx5dld6zxzJip/LHHZBu6tb75B56I+6BLw73CcXzte LtpGD4htndlzvRKLVgRt8P6ld4TDb532qIGkaTnFSg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vsNw9TvmQidiXgZRZv+iQHllz24IZJBNzZLUJS6lywIIW6gC2oGtDmI/5VXfWfhZu0LVRbJ/5Hp7NVqdt2l+B4= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6344:: with SMTP id b4mr830627wrw.354.1584581664997; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 18:34:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200318032817.GA893@sol.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20200318032817.GA893@sol.localdomain> From: xiaohui li Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 09:34:03 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: is there root_fs.arm32 used by xfstests? To: Eric Biggers Cc: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" , Ext4 Developers List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org oh, thank you. I will try it as what you say. On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 11:28 AM Eric Biggers wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 11:16:32AM +0800, xiaohui li wrote: > > hello ted: > > > > many thanks for your xfstests-bld project which can be deployed on > > android systems and make mobile phone more robust and stable. > > but as is known, many low-end mobile phone=E2=80=99s cpu still use the = arm32 > > architecture. > > and if these low-end mobile phone also can make full use of xfstests > > to do fs tests, > > there will be more fs bug will be found and our filesystem will become > > more robust. > > > > but from below link: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/tytso/kvm-xfstests > > there is not arm32 root_fs. > > > > so if you or anyone can offer me a link which can download arm32 > > root_fs needed by xfstests=EF=BC=8C > > i appreciate it very much. > > > > best regards. > > Great to hear that you're interested in running xfstests on Android! Pro= bably > Ted stopped providing an arm32 root_fs because arm64 is much more common = now. > It should be pretty straightforward to build an arm32 root_fs.tar yoursel= f, > though; have you checked the documentation in > https://github.com/tytso/xfstests-bld/blob/master/Documentation/building-= rootfs.md > ? > > It should just require: > > sudo ./setup-buildchroot --arch=3Darmhf > ./do-all --chroot=3Dbuster-armhf --out-tar > > I haven't done it in a while so I can't guarantee it hasn't gone stale, b= ut it's > supposed to work. > > - Eric