linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v8 1/2] kunit: Support for Parameterized Testing
@ 2020-11-15 18:57 Arpitha Raghunandan
  2020-11-15 18:59 ` [PATCH v8 2/2] fs: ext4: Modify inode-test.c to use KUnit parameterized testing feature Arpitha Raghunandan
  2020-11-30 22:24 ` [PATCH v8 1/2] kunit: Support for Parameterized Testing Brendan Higgins
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Arpitha Raghunandan @ 2020-11-15 18:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: brendanhiggins, skhan, elver, yzaikin, tytso, adilger.kernel,
	Tim.Bird, davidgow
  Cc: Arpitha Raghunandan, linux-kselftest, kunit-dev, linux-kernel,
	linux-kernel-mentees, linux-ext4

Implementation of support for parameterized testing in KUnit. This
approach requires the creation of a test case using the
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM() macro that accepts a generator function as input.

This generator function should return the next parameter given the
previous parameter in parameterized tests. It also provides a macro to
generate common-case generators based on arrays. Generators may also
optionally provide a human-readable description of parameters, which is
displayed where available.

Note, currently the result of each parameter run is displayed in
diagnostic lines, and only the overall test case output summarizes
TAP-compliant success or failure of all parameter runs. In future, when
supported by kunit-tool, these can be turned into subsubtest outputs.

Signed-off-by: Arpitha Raghunandan <98.arpi@gmail.com>
Co-developed-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
---
Changes v7->v8:
- Increase KUNIT_PARAM_DESC_SIZE to 128
- Format pointer style appropriately 

Changes v6->v7:
- Clarify commit message.
- Introduce ability to optionally generate descriptions for parameters;
  if no description is provided, we'll still print 'param-N'.
- Change diagnostic line format to:
        # <test-case-name>: <ok|not ok> N - [<param description>]

Changes v5->v6:
- Fix alignment to maintain consistency

Changes v4->v5:
- Update kernel-doc comments.
- Use const void* for generator return and prev value types.
- Add kernel-doc comment for KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM.
- Rework parameterized test case execution strategy: each parameter is executed
  as if it was its own test case, with its own test initialization and cleanup
  (init and exit are called, etc.). However, we cannot add new test cases per TAP
  protocol once we have already started execution. Instead, log the result of
  each parameter run as a diagnostic comment.

Changes v3->v4:
- Rename kunit variables
- Rename generator function helper macro
- Add documentation for generator approach
- Display test case name in case of failure along with param index

Changes v2->v3:
- Modifictaion of generator macro and method

Changes v1->v2:
- Use of a generator method to access test case parameters
Changes v6->v7:
- Clarify commit message.
- Introduce ability to optionally generate descriptions for parameters;
  if no description is provided, we'll still print 'param-N'.
- Change diagnostic line format to:
        # <test-case-name>: <ok|not ok> N - [<param description>]
- Before execution of parameterized test case, count number of
  parameters and display number of parameters. Currently also as a
  diagnostic line, but this may be used in future to generate a subsubtest
  plan. A requirement of this change is that generators must generate a
  deterministic number of parameters.

Changes v5->v6:
- Fix alignment to maintain consistency

Changes v4->v5:
- Update kernel-doc comments.
- Use const void* for generator return and prev value types.
- Add kernel-doc comment for KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM.
- Rework parameterized test case execution strategy: each parameter is executed
  as if it was its own test case, with its own test initialization and cleanup
  (init and exit are called, etc.). However, we cannot add new test cases per TAP
  protocol once we have already started execution. Instead, log the result of
  each parameter run as a diagnostic comment.

Changes v3->v4:
- Rename kunit variables
- Rename generator function helper macro
- Add documentation for generator approach
- Display test case name in case of failure along with param index

Changes v2->v3:
- Modifictaion of generator macro and method

Changes v1->v2:
- Use of a generator method to access test case parameters

 include/kunit/test.h | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 lib/kunit/test.c     | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 2 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h
index db1b0ae666c4..27b42a008c7a 100644
--- a/include/kunit/test.h
+++ b/include/kunit/test.h
@@ -94,6 +94,9 @@ struct kunit;
 /* Size of log associated with test. */
 #define KUNIT_LOG_SIZE	512
 
+/* Maximum size of parameter description string. */
+#define KUNIT_PARAM_DESC_SIZE 128
+
 /*
  * TAP specifies subtest stream indentation of 4 spaces, 8 spaces for a
  * sub-subtest.  See the "Subtests" section in
@@ -107,6 +110,7 @@ struct kunit;
  *
  * @run_case: the function representing the actual test case.
  * @name:     the name of the test case.
+ * @generate_params: the generator function for parameterized tests.
  *
  * A test case is a function with the signature,
  * ``void (*)(struct kunit *)``
@@ -141,6 +145,7 @@ struct kunit;
 struct kunit_case {
 	void (*run_case)(struct kunit *test);
 	const char *name;
+	const void* (*generate_params)(const void *prev, char *desc);
 
 	/* private: internal use only. */
 	bool success;
@@ -163,6 +168,27 @@ static inline char *kunit_status_to_string(bool status)
  */
 #define KUNIT_CASE(test_name) { .run_case = test_name, .name = #test_name }
 
+/**
+ * KUNIT_CASE_PARAM - A helper for creation a parameterized &struct kunit_case
+ *
+ * @test_name: a reference to a test case function.
+ * @gen_params: a reference to a parameter generator function.
+ *
+ * The generator function::
+ *
+ *	const void* gen_params(const void *prev, char *desc)
+ *
+ * is used to lazily generate a series of arbitrarily typed values that fit into
+ * a void*. The argument @prev is the previously returned value, which should be
+ * used to derive the next value; @prev is set to NULL on the initial generator
+ * call. When no more values are available, the generator must return NULL.
+ * Optionally write a string into @desc (size of KUNIT_PARAM_DESC_SIZE)
+ * describing the parameter.
+ */
+#define KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(test_name, gen_params)			\
+		{ .run_case = test_name, .name = #test_name,	\
+		  .generate_params = gen_params }
+
 /**
  * struct kunit_suite - describes a related collection of &struct kunit_case
  *
@@ -208,6 +234,10 @@ struct kunit {
 	const char *name; /* Read only after initialization! */
 	char *log; /* Points at case log after initialization */
 	struct kunit_try_catch try_catch;
+	/* param_value is the current parameter value for a test case. */
+	const void *param_value;
+	/* param_index stores the index of the parameter in parameterized tests. */
+	int param_index;
 	/*
 	 * success starts as true, and may only be set to false during a
 	 * test case; thus, it is safe to update this across multiple
@@ -1742,4 +1772,25 @@ do {									       \
 						fmt,			       \
 						##__VA_ARGS__)
 
+/**
+ * KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM() - Define test parameter generator from an array.
+ * @name:  prefix for the test parameter generator function.
+ * @array: array of test parameters.
+ * @get_desc: function to convert param to description; NULL to use default
+ *
+ * Define function @name_gen_params which uses @array to generate parameters.
+ */
+#define KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM(name, array, get_desc)						\
+	static const void *name##_gen_params(const void *prev, char *desc)			\
+	{											\
+		typeof((array)[0]) *__next = prev ? ((typeof(__next)) prev) + 1 : (array);	\
+		if (__next - (array) < ARRAY_SIZE((array))) {					\
+			void (*__get_desc)(typeof(__next), char *) = get_desc;			\
+			if (__get_desc)								\
+				__get_desc(__next, desc);					\
+			return __next;								\
+		}										\
+		return NULL;									\
+	}
+
 #endif /* _KUNIT_TEST_H */
diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c
index 750704abe89a..ec9494e914ef 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/test.c
+++ b/lib/kunit/test.c
@@ -325,39 +325,72 @@ static void kunit_catch_run_case(void *data)
  * occur in a test case and reports them as failures.
  */
 static void kunit_run_case_catch_errors(struct kunit_suite *suite,
-					struct kunit_case *test_case)
+					struct kunit_case *test_case,
+					struct kunit *test)
 {
 	struct kunit_try_catch_context context;
 	struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch;
-	struct kunit test;
 
-	kunit_init_test(&test, test_case->name, test_case->log);
-	try_catch = &test.try_catch;
+	kunit_init_test(test, test_case->name, test_case->log);
+	try_catch = &test->try_catch;
 
 	kunit_try_catch_init(try_catch,
-			     &test,
+			     test,
 			     kunit_try_run_case,
 			     kunit_catch_run_case);
-	context.test = &test;
+	context.test = test;
 	context.suite = suite;
 	context.test_case = test_case;
 	kunit_try_catch_run(try_catch, &context);
 
-	test_case->success = test.success;
-
-	kunit_print_ok_not_ok(&test, true, test_case->success,
-			      kunit_test_case_num(suite, test_case),
-			      test_case->name);
+	test_case->success = test->success;
 }
 
 int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite)
 {
+	char param_desc[KUNIT_PARAM_DESC_SIZE];
 	struct kunit_case *test_case;
 
 	kunit_print_subtest_start(suite);
 
-	kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case)
-		kunit_run_case_catch_errors(suite, test_case);
+	kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case) {
+		struct kunit test = { .param_value = NULL, .param_index = 0 };
+		bool test_success = true;
+
+		if (test_case->generate_params) {
+			/* Get initial param. */
+			param_desc[0] = '\0';
+			test.param_value = test_case->generate_params(NULL, param_desc);
+		}
+
+		do {
+			kunit_run_case_catch_errors(suite, test_case, &test);
+			test_success &= test_case->success;
+
+			if (test_case->generate_params) {
+				if (param_desc[0] == '\0') {
+					snprintf(param_desc, sizeof(param_desc),
+						 "param-%d", test.param_index);
+				}
+
+				kunit_log(KERN_INFO, &test,
+					  KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT
+					  "# %s: %s %d - %s",
+					  test_case->name,
+					  kunit_status_to_string(test.success),
+					  test.param_index + 1, param_desc);
+
+				/* Get next param. */
+				param_desc[0] = '\0';
+				test.param_value = test_case->generate_params(test.param_value, param_desc);
+				test.param_index++;
+			}
+		} while (test.param_value);
+
+		kunit_print_ok_not_ok(&test, true, test_success,
+				      kunit_test_case_num(suite, test_case),
+				      test_case->name);
+	}
 
 	kunit_print_subtest_end(suite);
 
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v8 2/2] fs: ext4: Modify inode-test.c to use KUnit parameterized testing feature
  2020-11-15 18:57 [PATCH v8 1/2] kunit: Support for Parameterized Testing Arpitha Raghunandan
@ 2020-11-15 18:59 ` Arpitha Raghunandan
  2020-11-15 19:44   ` Marco Elver
  2020-11-30 22:24 ` [PATCH v8 1/2] kunit: Support for Parameterized Testing Brendan Higgins
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Arpitha Raghunandan @ 2020-11-15 18:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: brendanhiggins, skhan, elver, yzaikin, tytso, adilger.kernel,
	Tim.Bird, davidgow
  Cc: Arpitha Raghunandan, linux-kselftest, kunit-dev, linux-kernel,
	linux-kernel-mentees, linux-ext4

Modify fs/ext4/inode-test.c to use the parameterized testing
feature of KUnit.

Signed-off-by: Arpitha Raghunandan <98.arpi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
---
Changes v7->v8:
- Replace strcpy() with strncpy() in timestamp_expectation_to_desc()
Changes v6->v7:
- Introduce timestamp_expectation_to_desc() to convert param to
  description.
Changes v5->v6:
- No change to this patch of the patch series
Changes v4->v5:
- No change to this patch of the patch series
Changes v3->v4:
- Modification based on latest implementation of KUnit parameterized testing
Changes v2->v3:
- Marked hardcoded test data const
- Modification based on latest implementation of KUnit parameterized testing
Changes v1->v2:
- Modification based on latest implementation of KUnit parameterized testing

 fs/ext4/inode-test.c | 323 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 167 insertions(+), 156 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode-test.c b/fs/ext4/inode-test.c
index d62d802c9c12..2c0c00c45c6b 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode-test.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode-test.c
@@ -80,6 +80,148 @@ struct timestamp_expectation {
 	bool lower_bound;
 };
 
+static const struct timestamp_expectation test_data[] = {
+	{
+		.test_case_name = LOWER_BOUND_NEG_NO_EXTRA_BITS_CASE,
+		.msb_set = true,
+		.lower_bound = true,
+		.extra_bits = 0,
+		.expected = {.tv_sec = -0x80000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
+	},
+
+	{
+		.test_case_name = UPPER_BOUND_NEG_NO_EXTRA_BITS_CASE,
+		.msb_set = true,
+		.lower_bound = false,
+		.extra_bits = 0,
+		.expected = {.tv_sec = -1LL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
+	},
+
+	{
+		.test_case_name = LOWER_BOUND_NONNEG_NO_EXTRA_BITS_CASE,
+		.msb_set = false,
+		.lower_bound = true,
+		.extra_bits = 0,
+		.expected = {0LL, 0L},
+	},
+
+	{
+		.test_case_name = UPPER_BOUND_NONNEG_NO_EXTRA_BITS_CASE,
+		.msb_set = false,
+		.lower_bound = false,
+		.extra_bits = 0,
+		.expected = {.tv_sec = 0x7fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
+	},
+
+	{
+		.test_case_name = LOWER_BOUND_NEG_LO_1_CASE,
+		.msb_set = true,
+		.lower_bound = true,
+		.extra_bits = 1,
+		.expected = {.tv_sec = 0x80000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
+	},
+
+	{
+		.test_case_name = UPPER_BOUND_NEG_LO_1_CASE,
+		.msb_set = true,
+		.lower_bound = false,
+		.extra_bits = 1,
+		.expected = {.tv_sec = 0xffffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
+	},
+
+	{
+		.test_case_name = LOWER_BOUND_NONNEG_LO_1_CASE,
+		.msb_set = false,
+		.lower_bound = true,
+		.extra_bits = 1,
+		.expected = {.tv_sec = 0x100000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
+	},
+
+	{
+		.test_case_name = UPPER_BOUND_NONNEG_LO_1_CASE,
+		.msb_set = false,
+		.lower_bound = false,
+		.extra_bits = 1,
+		.expected = {.tv_sec = 0x17fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
+	},
+
+	{
+		.test_case_name = LOWER_BOUND_NEG_HI_1_CASE,
+		.msb_set = true,
+		.lower_bound = true,
+		.extra_bits =  2,
+		.expected = {.tv_sec = 0x180000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
+	},
+
+	{
+		.test_case_name = UPPER_BOUND_NEG_HI_1_CASE,
+		.msb_set = true,
+		.lower_bound = false,
+		.extra_bits = 2,
+		.expected = {.tv_sec = 0x1ffffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
+	},
+
+	{
+		.test_case_name = LOWER_BOUND_NONNEG_HI_1_CASE,
+		.msb_set = false,
+		.lower_bound = true,
+		.extra_bits = 2,
+		.expected = {.tv_sec = 0x200000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
+	},
+
+	{
+		.test_case_name = UPPER_BOUND_NONNEG_HI_1_CASE,
+		.msb_set = false,
+		.lower_bound = false,
+		.extra_bits = 2,
+		.expected = {.tv_sec = 0x27fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
+	},
+
+	{
+		.test_case_name = UPPER_BOUND_NONNEG_HI_1_NS_1_CASE,
+		.msb_set = false,
+		.lower_bound = false,
+		.extra_bits = 6,
+		.expected = {.tv_sec = 0x27fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 1L},
+	},
+
+	{
+		.test_case_name = LOWER_BOUND_NONNEG_HI_1_NS_MAX_CASE,
+		.msb_set = false,
+		.lower_bound = true,
+		.extra_bits = 0xFFFFFFFF,
+		.expected = {.tv_sec = 0x300000000LL,
+			     .tv_nsec = MAX_NANOSECONDS},
+	},
+
+	{
+		.test_case_name = LOWER_BOUND_NONNEG_EXTRA_BITS_1_CASE,
+		.msb_set = false,
+		.lower_bound = true,
+		.extra_bits = 3,
+		.expected = {.tv_sec = 0x300000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
+	},
+
+	{
+		.test_case_name = UPPER_BOUND_NONNEG_EXTRA_BITS_1_CASE,
+		.msb_set = false,
+		.lower_bound = false,
+		.extra_bits = 3,
+		.expected = {.tv_sec = 0x37fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
+	}
+};
+
+static void timestamp_expectation_to_desc(const struct timestamp_expectation *t,
+					  char *desc)
+{
+	int desc_length = strlen(t->test_case_name);
+
+	strncpy(desc, t->test_case_name, desc_length);
+	desc[desc_length] = '\0';
+}
+
+KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM(ext4_inode, test_data, timestamp_expectation_to_desc);
+
 static time64_t get_32bit_time(const struct timestamp_expectation * const test)
 {
 	if (test->msb_set) {
@@ -101,166 +243,35 @@ static time64_t get_32bit_time(const struct timestamp_expectation * const test)
  */
 static void inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding(struct kunit *test)
 {
-	const struct timestamp_expectation test_data[] = {
-		{
-			.test_case_name = LOWER_BOUND_NEG_NO_EXTRA_BITS_CASE,
-			.msb_set = true,
-			.lower_bound = true,
-			.extra_bits = 0,
-			.expected = {.tv_sec = -0x80000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
-		},
-
-		{
-			.test_case_name = UPPER_BOUND_NEG_NO_EXTRA_BITS_CASE,
-			.msb_set = true,
-			.lower_bound = false,
-			.extra_bits = 0,
-			.expected = {.tv_sec = -1LL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
-		},
-
-		{
-			.test_case_name = LOWER_BOUND_NONNEG_NO_EXTRA_BITS_CASE,
-			.msb_set = false,
-			.lower_bound = true,
-			.extra_bits = 0,
-			.expected = {0LL, 0L},
-		},
-
-		{
-			.test_case_name = UPPER_BOUND_NONNEG_NO_EXTRA_BITS_CASE,
-			.msb_set = false,
-			.lower_bound = false,
-			.extra_bits = 0,
-			.expected = {.tv_sec = 0x7fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
-		},
-
-		{
-			.test_case_name = LOWER_BOUND_NEG_LO_1_CASE,
-			.msb_set = true,
-			.lower_bound = true,
-			.extra_bits = 1,
-			.expected = {.tv_sec = 0x80000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
-		},
-
-		{
-			.test_case_name = UPPER_BOUND_NEG_LO_1_CASE,
-			.msb_set = true,
-			.lower_bound = false,
-			.extra_bits = 1,
-			.expected = {.tv_sec = 0xffffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
-		},
-
-		{
-			.test_case_name = LOWER_BOUND_NONNEG_LO_1_CASE,
-			.msb_set = false,
-			.lower_bound = true,
-			.extra_bits = 1,
-			.expected = {.tv_sec = 0x100000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
-		},
-
-		{
-			.test_case_name = UPPER_BOUND_NONNEG_LO_1_CASE,
-			.msb_set = false,
-			.lower_bound = false,
-			.extra_bits = 1,
-			.expected = {.tv_sec = 0x17fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
-		},
-
-		{
-			.test_case_name = LOWER_BOUND_NEG_HI_1_CASE,
-			.msb_set = true,
-			.lower_bound = true,
-			.extra_bits =  2,
-			.expected = {.tv_sec = 0x180000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
-		},
-
-		{
-			.test_case_name = UPPER_BOUND_NEG_HI_1_CASE,
-			.msb_set = true,
-			.lower_bound = false,
-			.extra_bits = 2,
-			.expected = {.tv_sec = 0x1ffffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
-		},
-
-		{
-			.test_case_name = LOWER_BOUND_NONNEG_HI_1_CASE,
-			.msb_set = false,
-			.lower_bound = true,
-			.extra_bits = 2,
-			.expected = {.tv_sec = 0x200000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
-		},
-
-		{
-			.test_case_name = UPPER_BOUND_NONNEG_HI_1_CASE,
-			.msb_set = false,
-			.lower_bound = false,
-			.extra_bits = 2,
-			.expected = {.tv_sec = 0x27fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
-		},
-
-		{
-			.test_case_name = UPPER_BOUND_NONNEG_HI_1_NS_1_CASE,
-			.msb_set = false,
-			.lower_bound = false,
-			.extra_bits = 6,
-			.expected = {.tv_sec = 0x27fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 1L},
-		},
-
-		{
-			.test_case_name = LOWER_BOUND_NONNEG_HI_1_NS_MAX_CASE,
-			.msb_set = false,
-			.lower_bound = true,
-			.extra_bits = 0xFFFFFFFF,
-			.expected = {.tv_sec = 0x300000000LL,
-				     .tv_nsec = MAX_NANOSECONDS},
-		},
-
-		{
-			.test_case_name = LOWER_BOUND_NONNEG_EXTRA_BITS_1_CASE,
-			.msb_set = false,
-			.lower_bound = true,
-			.extra_bits = 3,
-			.expected = {.tv_sec = 0x300000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
-		},
-
-		{
-			.test_case_name = UPPER_BOUND_NONNEG_EXTRA_BITS_1_CASE,
-			.msb_set = false,
-			.lower_bound = false,
-			.extra_bits = 3,
-			.expected = {.tv_sec = 0x37fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
-		}
-	};
-
 	struct timespec64 timestamp;
-	int i;
-
-	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_data); ++i) {
-		timestamp.tv_sec = get_32bit_time(&test_data[i]);
-		ext4_decode_extra_time(&timestamp,
-				       cpu_to_le32(test_data[i].extra_bits));
-
-		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test,
-				    test_data[i].expected.tv_sec,
-				    timestamp.tv_sec,
-				    CASE_NAME_FORMAT,
-				    test_data[i].test_case_name,
-				    test_data[i].msb_set,
-				    test_data[i].lower_bound,
-				    test_data[i].extra_bits);
-		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test,
-				    test_data[i].expected.tv_nsec,
-				    timestamp.tv_nsec,
-				    CASE_NAME_FORMAT,
-				    test_data[i].test_case_name,
-				    test_data[i].msb_set,
-				    test_data[i].lower_bound,
-				    test_data[i].extra_bits);
-	}
+
+	struct timestamp_expectation *test_param =
+			(struct timestamp_expectation *)(test->param_value);
+
+	timestamp.tv_sec = get_32bit_time(test_param);
+	ext4_decode_extra_time(&timestamp,
+			       cpu_to_le32(test_param->extra_bits));
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test,
+			    test_param->expected.tv_sec,
+			    timestamp.tv_sec,
+			    CASE_NAME_FORMAT,
+			    test_param->test_case_name,
+			    test_param->msb_set,
+			    test_param->lower_bound,
+			    test_param->extra_bits);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test,
+			    test_param->expected.tv_nsec,
+			    timestamp.tv_nsec,
+			    CASE_NAME_FORMAT,
+			    test_param->test_case_name,
+			    test_param->msb_set,
+			    test_param->lower_bound,
+			    test_param->extra_bits);
 }
 
 static struct kunit_case ext4_inode_test_cases[] = {
-	KUNIT_CASE(inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding),
+	KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding, ext4_inode_gen_params),
 	{}
 };
 
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] fs: ext4: Modify inode-test.c to use KUnit parameterized testing feature
  2020-11-15 18:59 ` [PATCH v8 2/2] fs: ext4: Modify inode-test.c to use KUnit parameterized testing feature Arpitha Raghunandan
@ 2020-11-15 19:44   ` Marco Elver
  2020-11-16  4:54     ` Arpitha Raghunandan
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Marco Elver @ 2020-11-15 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arpitha Raghunandan
  Cc: Brendan Higgins, Shuah Khan, Iurii Zaikin, Theodore Ts'o,
	Andreas Dilger, Tim Bird, David Gow,
	open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK, KUnit Development, LKML,
	linux-kernel-mentees, linux-ext4

On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 at 19:59, Arpitha Raghunandan <98.arpi@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Modify fs/ext4/inode-test.c to use the parameterized testing
> feature of KUnit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arpitha Raghunandan <98.arpi@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
> ---
> Changes v7->v8:
> - Replace strcpy() with strncpy() in timestamp_expectation_to_desc()
> Changes v6->v7:
> - Introduce timestamp_expectation_to_desc() to convert param to
>   description.
> Changes v5->v6:
> - No change to this patch of the patch series
> Changes v4->v5:
> - No change to this patch of the patch series
> Changes v3->v4:
> - Modification based on latest implementation of KUnit parameterized testing
> Changes v2->v3:
> - Marked hardcoded test data const
> - Modification based on latest implementation of KUnit parameterized testing
> Changes v1->v2:
> - Modification based on latest implementation of KUnit parameterized testing
>
>  fs/ext4/inode-test.c | 323 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  1 file changed, 167 insertions(+), 156 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode-test.c b/fs/ext4/inode-test.c
> index d62d802c9c12..2c0c00c45c6b 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inode-test.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode-test.c
> @@ -80,6 +80,148 @@ struct timestamp_expectation {
>         bool lower_bound;
>  };
>
> +static const struct timestamp_expectation test_data[] = {
> +       {
> +               .test_case_name = LOWER_BOUND_NEG_NO_EXTRA_BITS_CASE,
> +               .msb_set = true,
> +               .lower_bound = true,
> +               .extra_bits = 0,
> +               .expected = {.tv_sec = -0x80000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
> +       },
> +
> +       {
> +               .test_case_name = UPPER_BOUND_NEG_NO_EXTRA_BITS_CASE,
> +               .msb_set = true,
> +               .lower_bound = false,
> +               .extra_bits = 0,
> +               .expected = {.tv_sec = -1LL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
> +       },
> +
> +       {
> +               .test_case_name = LOWER_BOUND_NONNEG_NO_EXTRA_BITS_CASE,
> +               .msb_set = false,
> +               .lower_bound = true,
> +               .extra_bits = 0,
> +               .expected = {0LL, 0L},
> +       },
> +
> +       {
> +               .test_case_name = UPPER_BOUND_NONNEG_NO_EXTRA_BITS_CASE,
> +               .msb_set = false,
> +               .lower_bound = false,
> +               .extra_bits = 0,
> +               .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x7fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
> +       },
> +
> +       {
> +               .test_case_name = LOWER_BOUND_NEG_LO_1_CASE,
> +               .msb_set = true,
> +               .lower_bound = true,
> +               .extra_bits = 1,
> +               .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x80000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
> +       },
> +
> +       {
> +               .test_case_name = UPPER_BOUND_NEG_LO_1_CASE,
> +               .msb_set = true,
> +               .lower_bound = false,
> +               .extra_bits = 1,
> +               .expected = {.tv_sec = 0xffffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
> +       },
> +
> +       {
> +               .test_case_name = LOWER_BOUND_NONNEG_LO_1_CASE,
> +               .msb_set = false,
> +               .lower_bound = true,
> +               .extra_bits = 1,
> +               .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x100000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
> +       },
> +
> +       {
> +               .test_case_name = UPPER_BOUND_NONNEG_LO_1_CASE,
> +               .msb_set = false,
> +               .lower_bound = false,
> +               .extra_bits = 1,
> +               .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x17fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
> +       },
> +
> +       {
> +               .test_case_name = LOWER_BOUND_NEG_HI_1_CASE,
> +               .msb_set = true,
> +               .lower_bound = true,
> +               .extra_bits =  2,
> +               .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x180000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
> +       },
> +
> +       {
> +               .test_case_name = UPPER_BOUND_NEG_HI_1_CASE,
> +               .msb_set = true,
> +               .lower_bound = false,
> +               .extra_bits = 2,
> +               .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x1ffffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
> +       },
> +
> +       {
> +               .test_case_name = LOWER_BOUND_NONNEG_HI_1_CASE,
> +               .msb_set = false,
> +               .lower_bound = true,
> +               .extra_bits = 2,
> +               .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x200000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
> +       },
> +
> +       {
> +               .test_case_name = UPPER_BOUND_NONNEG_HI_1_CASE,
> +               .msb_set = false,
> +               .lower_bound = false,
> +               .extra_bits = 2,
> +               .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x27fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
> +       },
> +
> +       {
> +               .test_case_name = UPPER_BOUND_NONNEG_HI_1_NS_1_CASE,
> +               .msb_set = false,
> +               .lower_bound = false,
> +               .extra_bits = 6,
> +               .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x27fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 1L},
> +       },
> +
> +       {
> +               .test_case_name = LOWER_BOUND_NONNEG_HI_1_NS_MAX_CASE,
> +               .msb_set = false,
> +               .lower_bound = true,
> +               .extra_bits = 0xFFFFFFFF,
> +               .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x300000000LL,
> +                            .tv_nsec = MAX_NANOSECONDS},
> +       },
> +
> +       {
> +               .test_case_name = LOWER_BOUND_NONNEG_EXTRA_BITS_1_CASE,
> +               .msb_set = false,
> +               .lower_bound = true,
> +               .extra_bits = 3,
> +               .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x300000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
> +       },
> +
> +       {
> +               .test_case_name = UPPER_BOUND_NONNEG_EXTRA_BITS_1_CASE,
> +               .msb_set = false,
> +               .lower_bound = false,
> +               .extra_bits = 3,
> +               .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x37fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
> +       }
> +};
> +
> +static void timestamp_expectation_to_desc(const struct timestamp_expectation *t,
> +                                         char *desc)
> +{
> +       int desc_length = strlen(t->test_case_name);
> +
> +       strncpy(desc, t->test_case_name, desc_length);
> +       desc[desc_length] = '\0';
> +}

This unfortunately won't prevent out-of-bounds accesses if the
description is longer than KUNIT_PARAM_DESC_SIZE.

With strncpy() we want to avoid copying more bytes than the
destination buffer can hold. This can be done by simply a
strncpy(desc, t->test_case_name, KUNIT_PARAM_DESC_SIZE). But,
strncpy() is unsafe in certain cases, too, so the kernel introduced
strscpy() -- see the note about strncpy() in
Documentation/process/deprecated.rst. Also have a look at the
documentation about str{n,l,s}cpy() in lib/string.c.

So, finally, what we want here is just 1 line:

    strscpy(desc, t->test_case_name, KUNIT_PARAM_DESC_SIZE);

Patch 1/2 looks fine though, so hopefully v9 will be final. :-)

Thanks,
-- Marco

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] fs: ext4: Modify inode-test.c to use KUnit parameterized testing feature
  2020-11-15 19:44   ` Marco Elver
@ 2020-11-16  4:54     ` Arpitha Raghunandan
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Arpitha Raghunandan @ 2020-11-16  4:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Marco Elver
  Cc: Brendan Higgins, Shuah Khan, Iurii Zaikin, Theodore Ts'o,
	Andreas Dilger, Tim Bird, David Gow,
	open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK, KUnit Development, LKML,
	linux-kernel-mentees, linux-ext4

On 16/11/20 1:14 am, Marco Elver wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 at 19:59, Arpitha Raghunandan <98.arpi@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Modify fs/ext4/inode-test.c to use the parameterized testing
>> feature of KUnit.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arpitha Raghunandan <98.arpi@gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
>> ---
>> Changes v7->v8:
>> - Replace strcpy() with strncpy() in timestamp_expectation_to_desc()
>> Changes v6->v7:
>> - Introduce timestamp_expectation_to_desc() to convert param to
>>   description.
>> Changes v5->v6:
>> - No change to this patch of the patch series
>> Changes v4->v5:
>> - No change to this patch of the patch series
>> Changes v3->v4:
>> - Modification based on latest implementation of KUnit parameterized testing
>> Changes v2->v3:
>> - Marked hardcoded test data const
>> - Modification based on latest implementation of KUnit parameterized testing
>> Changes v1->v2:
>> - Modification based on latest implementation of KUnit parameterized testing
>>
>>  fs/ext4/inode-test.c | 323 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>>  1 file changed, 167 insertions(+), 156 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode-test.c b/fs/ext4/inode-test.c
>> index d62d802c9c12..2c0c00c45c6b 100644
>> --- a/fs/ext4/inode-test.c
>> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode-test.c
>> @@ -80,6 +80,148 @@ struct timestamp_expectation {
>>         bool lower_bound;
>>  };
>>
>> +static const struct timestamp_expectation test_data[] = {
>> +       {
>> +               .test_case_name = LOWER_BOUND_NEG_NO_EXTRA_BITS_CASE,
>> +               .msb_set = true,
>> +               .lower_bound = true,
>> +               .extra_bits = 0,
>> +               .expected = {.tv_sec = -0x80000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
>> +       },
>> +
>> +       {
>> +               .test_case_name = UPPER_BOUND_NEG_NO_EXTRA_BITS_CASE,
>> +               .msb_set = true,
>> +               .lower_bound = false,
>> +               .extra_bits = 0,
>> +               .expected = {.tv_sec = -1LL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
>> +       },
>> +
>> +       {
>> +               .test_case_name = LOWER_BOUND_NONNEG_NO_EXTRA_BITS_CASE,
>> +               .msb_set = false,
>> +               .lower_bound = true,
>> +               .extra_bits = 0,
>> +               .expected = {0LL, 0L},
>> +       },
>> +
>> +       {
>> +               .test_case_name = UPPER_BOUND_NONNEG_NO_EXTRA_BITS_CASE,
>> +               .msb_set = false,
>> +               .lower_bound = false,
>> +               .extra_bits = 0,
>> +               .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x7fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
>> +       },
>> +
>> +       {
>> +               .test_case_name = LOWER_BOUND_NEG_LO_1_CASE,
>> +               .msb_set = true,
>> +               .lower_bound = true,
>> +               .extra_bits = 1,
>> +               .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x80000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
>> +       },
>> +
>> +       {
>> +               .test_case_name = UPPER_BOUND_NEG_LO_1_CASE,
>> +               .msb_set = true,
>> +               .lower_bound = false,
>> +               .extra_bits = 1,
>> +               .expected = {.tv_sec = 0xffffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
>> +       },
>> +
>> +       {
>> +               .test_case_name = LOWER_BOUND_NONNEG_LO_1_CASE,
>> +               .msb_set = false,
>> +               .lower_bound = true,
>> +               .extra_bits = 1,
>> +               .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x100000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
>> +       },
>> +
>> +       {
>> +               .test_case_name = UPPER_BOUND_NONNEG_LO_1_CASE,
>> +               .msb_set = false,
>> +               .lower_bound = false,
>> +               .extra_bits = 1,
>> +               .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x17fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
>> +       },
>> +
>> +       {
>> +               .test_case_name = LOWER_BOUND_NEG_HI_1_CASE,
>> +               .msb_set = true,
>> +               .lower_bound = true,
>> +               .extra_bits =  2,
>> +               .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x180000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
>> +       },
>> +
>> +       {
>> +               .test_case_name = UPPER_BOUND_NEG_HI_1_CASE,
>> +               .msb_set = true,
>> +               .lower_bound = false,
>> +               .extra_bits = 2,
>> +               .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x1ffffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
>> +       },
>> +
>> +       {
>> +               .test_case_name = LOWER_BOUND_NONNEG_HI_1_CASE,
>> +               .msb_set = false,
>> +               .lower_bound = true,
>> +               .extra_bits = 2,
>> +               .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x200000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
>> +       },
>> +
>> +       {
>> +               .test_case_name = UPPER_BOUND_NONNEG_HI_1_CASE,
>> +               .msb_set = false,
>> +               .lower_bound = false,
>> +               .extra_bits = 2,
>> +               .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x27fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
>> +       },
>> +
>> +       {
>> +               .test_case_name = UPPER_BOUND_NONNEG_HI_1_NS_1_CASE,
>> +               .msb_set = false,
>> +               .lower_bound = false,
>> +               .extra_bits = 6,
>> +               .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x27fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 1L},
>> +       },
>> +
>> +       {
>> +               .test_case_name = LOWER_BOUND_NONNEG_HI_1_NS_MAX_CASE,
>> +               .msb_set = false,
>> +               .lower_bound = true,
>> +               .extra_bits = 0xFFFFFFFF,
>> +               .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x300000000LL,
>> +                            .tv_nsec = MAX_NANOSECONDS},
>> +       },
>> +
>> +       {
>> +               .test_case_name = LOWER_BOUND_NONNEG_EXTRA_BITS_1_CASE,
>> +               .msb_set = false,
>> +               .lower_bound = true,
>> +               .extra_bits = 3,
>> +               .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x300000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
>> +       },
>> +
>> +       {
>> +               .test_case_name = UPPER_BOUND_NONNEG_EXTRA_BITS_1_CASE,
>> +               .msb_set = false,
>> +               .lower_bound = false,
>> +               .extra_bits = 3,
>> +               .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x37fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
>> +       }
>> +};
>> +
>> +static void timestamp_expectation_to_desc(const struct timestamp_expectation *t,
>> +                                         char *desc)
>> +{
>> +       int desc_length = strlen(t->test_case_name);
>> +
>> +       strncpy(desc, t->test_case_name, desc_length);
>> +       desc[desc_length] = '\0';
>> +}
> 
> This unfortunately won't prevent out-of-bounds accesses if the
> description is longer than KUNIT_PARAM_DESC_SIZE.
> 
> With strncpy() we want to avoid copying more bytes than the
> destination buffer can hold. This can be done by simply a
> strncpy(desc, t->test_case_name, KUNIT_PARAM_DESC_SIZE). But,
> strncpy() is unsafe in certain cases, too, so the kernel introduced
> strscpy() -- see the note about strncpy() in
> Documentation/process/deprecated.rst. Also have a look at the
> documentation about str{n,l,s}cpy() in lib/string.c.
> 
> So, finally, what we want here is just 1 line:
> 
>     strscpy(desc, t->test_case_name, KUNIT_PARAM_DESC_SIZE);
> 

Okay, I'll look this up and make this change for v9.

> Patch 1/2 looks fine though, so hopefully v9 will be final. :-)
> 
> Thanks,
> -- Marco
> 

Thanks!


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v8 1/2] kunit: Support for Parameterized Testing
  2020-11-15 18:57 [PATCH v8 1/2] kunit: Support for Parameterized Testing Arpitha Raghunandan
  2020-11-15 18:59 ` [PATCH v8 2/2] fs: ext4: Modify inode-test.c to use KUnit parameterized testing feature Arpitha Raghunandan
@ 2020-11-30 22:24 ` Brendan Higgins
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Brendan Higgins @ 2020-11-30 22:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arpitha Raghunandan
  Cc: Shuah Khan, Marco Elver, Iurii Zaikin, Theodore Ts'o,
	Andreas Dilger, Bird, Timothy, David Gow,
	open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK, KUnit Development,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-kernel-mentees, linux-ext4

On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 10:58 AM Arpitha Raghunandan <98.arpi@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Implementation of support for parameterized testing in KUnit. This
> approach requires the creation of a test case using the
> KUNIT_CASE_PARAM() macro that accepts a generator function as input.
>
> This generator function should return the next parameter given the
> previous parameter in parameterized tests. It also provides a macro to
> generate common-case generators based on arrays. Generators may also
> optionally provide a human-readable description of parameters, which is
> displayed where available.
>
> Note, currently the result of each parameter run is displayed in
> diagnostic lines, and only the overall test case output summarizes
> TAP-compliant success or failure of all parameter runs. In future, when
> supported by kunit-tool, these can be turned into subsubtest outputs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arpitha Raghunandan <98.arpi@gmail.com>
> Co-developed-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>

Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-11-30 22:24 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-11-15 18:57 [PATCH v8 1/2] kunit: Support for Parameterized Testing Arpitha Raghunandan
2020-11-15 18:59 ` [PATCH v8 2/2] fs: ext4: Modify inode-test.c to use KUnit parameterized testing feature Arpitha Raghunandan
2020-11-15 19:44   ` Marco Elver
2020-11-16  4:54     ` Arpitha Raghunandan
2020-11-30 22:24 ` [PATCH v8 1/2] kunit: Support for Parameterized Testing Brendan Higgins

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).