From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
To: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com>
Cc: LTP List <ltp@lists.linux.it>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>,
Ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@google.com>,
kernel@collabora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] syscalls/fanotify20: Test file event with broken inode
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2021 08:27:46 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOQ4uxis23+T3=+R+9rKkxtZLtS4S4LJ6RBgG0AEHsg4=MJyRA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87k0l1hkuz.fsf@collabora.com>
On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 7:52 AM Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
<krisman@collabora.com> wrote:
>
> Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 12:47 AM Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
> > <krisman@collabora.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> This test corrupts an inode entry with an invalid mode through debugfs
> >> and then tries to access it. This should result in a ext4 error, which
> >> we monitor through the fanotify group.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com>
> >> ---
> >> .../kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify20.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify20.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify20.c
> >> index e7ced28eb61d..0c63e90edc3a 100644
> >> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify20.c
> >> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify20.c
> >> @@ -76,6 +76,36 @@ static void trigger_fs_abort(void)
> >> MS_REMOUNT|MS_RDONLY, "abort");
> >> }
> >>
> >> +#define TCASE2_BASEDIR "tcase2"
> >> +#define TCASE2_BAD_DIR TCASE2_BASEDIR"/bad_dir"
> >> +
> >> +static unsigned int tcase2_bad_ino;
> >> +static void tcase2_prepare_fs(void)
> >> +{
> >> + struct stat stat;
> >> +
> >> + SAFE_MKDIR(MOUNT_PATH"/"TCASE2_BASEDIR, 0777);
> >> + SAFE_MKDIR(MOUNT_PATH"/"TCASE2_BAD_DIR, 0777);
> >> +
> >> + SAFE_STAT(MOUNT_PATH"/"TCASE2_BAD_DIR, &stat);
> >> + tcase2_bad_ino = stat.st_ino;
> >> +
> >> + SAFE_UMOUNT(MOUNT_PATH);
> >> + do_debugfs_request(tst_device->dev, "sif " TCASE2_BAD_DIR " mode 0xff");
> >> + SAFE_MOUNT(tst_device->dev, MOUNT_PATH, tst_device->fs_type, 0, NULL);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static void tcase2_trigger_lookup(void)
> >> +{
> >> + int ret;
> >> +
> >> + /* SAFE_OPEN cannot be used here because we expect it to fail. */
> >> + ret = open(MOUNT_PATH"/"TCASE2_BAD_DIR, O_RDONLY, 0);
> >> + if (ret != -1 && errno != EUCLEAN)
> >> + tst_res(TFAIL, "Unexpected lookup result(%d) of %s (%d!=%d)",
> >> + ret, TCASE2_BAD_DIR, errno, EUCLEAN);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> static const struct test_case {
> >> char *name;
> >> int error;
> >> @@ -92,6 +122,14 @@ static const struct test_case {
> >> .error_count = 1,
> >> .error = EXT4_ERR_ESHUTDOWN,
> >> .inode = NULL
> >> + },
> >> + {
> >> + .name = "Lookup of inode with invalid mode",
> >> + .prepare_fs = tcase2_prepare_fs,
> >> + .trigger_error = &tcase2_trigger_lookup,
> >> + .error_count = 1,
> >> + .error = 0,
> >> + .inode = &tcase2_bad_ino,
> >
> > Why is error 0?
> > What's the rationale?
>
> Hi Amir,
>
> That is specific to Ext4. Some ext4 conditions report bogus error codes. I will
> come up with a kernel patch changing it.
>
Well, I would not expect a FAN_FS_ERROR event to ever have 0 error
value. Since this test practically only tests ext4, I do not think it
is reasonable
for the test to VERIFY a bug. It is fine to write this test with expectations
that are not met and let it fail.
But a better plan would probably be to merge the patches up to 5 to test
FAN_FS_ERROR and then add more test cases after ext4 is fixed
Either that or you fix the ext4 problem along with FAN_FS_ERROR.
Forgot to say that the test needs to declare .needs_cmds "debugfs".
In any case, as far as prerequisite to merging FAN_FS_ERROR
your WIP tests certainly suffice.
Please keep your test branch around so we can use it to validate
the kernel patches.
I usually hold off on submitting LTP tests for inclusion until at least -rc3
after kernel patches have been merged.
Thanks,
Amir.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-04 5:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-02 21:46 [PATCH 0/7] Test the new fanotify FAN_FS_ERROR event Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-08-02 21:46 ` [PATCH 1/7] syscalls/fanotify20: Introduce helpers for FAN_FS_ERROR test Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-08-03 8:30 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-08-02 21:46 ` [PATCH 2/7] syscalls/fanotify20: Validate the generic error info Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-08-03 8:42 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-08-02 21:46 ` [PATCH 3/7] syscalls/fanotify20: Validate incoming FID in FAN_FS_ERROR Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-08-03 8:56 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-08-04 4:54 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-08-04 5:39 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-08-04 7:40 ` Matthew Bobrowski
2021-08-20 10:21 ` [LTP] " Petr Vorel
2021-08-20 21:58 ` Matthew Bobrowski
2021-08-23 9:35 ` Jan Kara
2021-08-23 11:19 ` Matthew Bobrowski
2021-08-23 14:34 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-08-02 21:46 ` [PATCH 4/7] syscalls/fanotify20: Watch event after filesystem abort Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-08-02 21:46 ` [PATCH 5/7] syscalls/fanotify20: Support submission of debugfs commands Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-08-02 21:46 ` [PATCH 6/7] syscalls/fanotify20: Test file event with broken inode Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-08-03 9:04 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-08-03 9:08 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-08-04 4:52 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-08-04 5:27 ` Amir Goldstein [this message]
2021-08-05 21:50 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-08-02 21:46 ` [PATCH 7/7] syscalls/fanotify20: Test capture of multiple errors Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAOQ4uxis23+T3=+R+9rKkxtZLtS4S4LJ6RBgG0AEHsg4=MJyRA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.com \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=khazhy@google.com \
--cc=krisman@collabora.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).