From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BC88C433B4 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 16:50:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FA7E613D0 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 16:50:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1346593AbhDFQvE (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Apr 2021 12:51:04 -0400 Received: from outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu ([18.9.28.11]:35093 "EHLO outgoing.mit.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S244338AbhDFQvD (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Apr 2021 12:51:03 -0400 Received: from cwcc.thunk.org (pool-72-74-133-215.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [72.74.133.215]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as tytso@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 136GomPx031788 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 6 Apr 2021 12:50:49 -0400 Received: by cwcc.thunk.org (Postfix, from userid 15806) id 9266C15C3B0C; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 12:50:48 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 12:50:48 -0400 From: "Theodore Ts'o" To: Jan Kara Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Matthew Wilcox , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3 RFC] fs: Hole punch vs page cache filling races Message-ID: References: <20210120160611.26853-1-jack@suse.cz> <20210406121702.GB19407@quack2.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 12:45:28PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > Hmm, I wonder if it somehow got hit by the vger.kernel.org > instabilities a while back? As near as I can tell your v2 patches > never were received by: > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-ext4/ > > (There are no ext4 patches on patchwork.ozlabs.org on February 8th, > although I do see patches hitting patchwork on February 7th and 9th.) I just noticed that the V2 patches were only sent to linux-fsdevel and not cc'ed to linux-ext4. So that explains why I didn't see it on patchwork. :-) - Ted