From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> This is needed to test the encryption and casefolding features in combination. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> --- .../test-appliance/files/root/fs/ext4/cfg/encrypt.exclude | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/kvm-xfstests/test-appliance/files/root/fs/ext4/cfg/encrypt.exclude b/kvm-xfstests/test-appliance/files/root/fs/ext4/cfg/encrypt.exclude index b7f6ea3..20abf5e 100644 --- a/kvm-xfstests/test-appliance/files/root/fs/ext4/cfg/encrypt.exclude +++ b/kvm-xfstests/test-appliance/files/root/fs/ext4/cfg/encrypt.exclude @@ -30,9 +30,6 @@ generic/587 generic/600 generic/601 -# encryption doesn't play well with casefold (at least not yet) -generic/556 - # generic/204 tests ENOSPC handling; it doesn't correctly # anticipate the external extended attribute required when # using a 1k block size -- 2.31.1
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 02:53:00PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
>
> This is needed to test the encryption and casefolding features in
> combination.
Yeah, this is has been on my radar screen, but it's been on my todo
list to submit a patch to generic/556 something like:
if [ "$FSTYP" = "ext4" -a ! -f /sys/fs/ext4/features/encrypted_casefold ]; then
_notrun "ext4 file system does not support encrypted casefold"
fi
before removing generic/556 from the encrypt.exclude list.
I'll probably get to it by this weekend, unless someone beats me to
it.
Cheers,
- Ted