From: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
To: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 16/19] ext4: call ext4_mb_mark_group_bb in ext4_mb_clear_bb
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2023 22:16:38 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bb19c6f8-d31f-f686-17f9-3fd2bb1db3dd@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZH7+xclxW3hKb7GA@li-bb2b2a4c-3307-11b2-a85c-8fa5c3a69313.ibm.com>
on 6/6/2023 5:39 PM, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 03, 2023 at 11:03:24PM +0800, Kemeng Shi wrote:
>> call ext4_mb_mark_group_bb in ext4_mb_clear_bb to remove repeat code
>> to update block bitmap and group descriptor on disk.
>>
>> Note: ext4_mb_clear_bb will update buddy and bitmap in two critical sections
>> instead of update in the same critical section.
>>
>> Original lock behavior introduced in 7a2fcbf7f857 ("ext4: don't use
>> blocks freed but not yet committed in buddy cache init") to avoid
>> race betwwen ext4_mb_free_blocks and ext4_mb_init_cache:
>> ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp
>> ext4_lock_group
>> mb_clear_bits(bitmap_bh, ...)
>> mb_free_blocks/ext4_mb_free_metadata
>> ext4_unlock_group
>> ext4_mb_unload_buddy
>>
>> New lock behavior in this patch:
>> ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp
>> ext4_lock_group
>> mb_clear_bits(bitmap_bh, ...)
>> ext4_unlock_group
>>
>> /* no ext4_mb_init_cache for the same group will be called as
>> ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp will ensure buddy page is update-to-date */
>>
>> ext4_lock_group
>> mb_free_blocks/ext4_mb_free_metadata
>> ext4_unlock_group
>> ext4_mb_unload_buddy
>>
>> As buddy page for group is always update-to-date between
>> ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp and ext4_mb_unload_buddy. Then no
>> ext4_mb_init_cache will be called for the same group concurrentlly when
>> we update bitmap and buddy page betwwen buddy load and unload.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
>
> Hi Kemeng,
>
> Sorry for the late reply I was trying to understand the codepath
> properly. So I have a question here:
>
> With the changes you've made in the patch, the flow would look something
> like:
>
> ext4_mb_clear_bb():
> ext4_mb_mark_group_bb():
> ext4_group_lock()
> - Mark bitmap free
> - Modify gdp
> ext4_group_unlock()
> ext4_handle_dirty_metadata()
> - I understand this will add the bitmap and gdp buffers to journal's
> dirty metadata list
> ...
> ext4_group_lock()
> ext4_mb_free_metadata()
> - Add ext4_free_data entries to sbi->s_freed_data_list. (On commit
> ext4_journal_commit_callback() will then free the buddy for these)
> ext4_group_unlock()
>
> My question is what happens if journal commits between
> ext4_handle_dirty_metadata() and ext4_mb_free_metadata() call (Possible?). Then we might
> never end up freeing the metadata in the buddy bitmap because the commit callback wont
> be able to find the ext4_free_data entries in sbi->s_freed_data_list.
>
> Regards,
> ojaswin
>
Hi Ojaswin, thanks for the reply. To my knowledge, commit should be normally done after handle
is stopped as following:
ext4_journal_start_sb
start_this_handle
read_lock(&journal->j_state_lock);
atomic_inc(&transaction->t_updates);
read_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);
ext4_journal_stop
jbd2_journal_stop
stop_this_handle
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&transaction->t_updates))
wake_up(&journal->j_wait_updates);
jbd2_journal_commit_transaction
jbd2_journal_wait_updates
while (1)
if (!atomic_read(&transaction->t_updates))
/* break loop */
...
if (journal->j_commit_callback)
journal->j_commit_callback(journal, commit_transaction);
So no commit of transaction should not happen between ext4_handle_dirty_metadata and
ext4_mb_free_metadata.
>> ---
>> fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 90 ++++++++++++-----------------------------------
>> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
>> index 46b37f5c9223..e4f1b34448e3 100644
>> --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
>> +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
>> @@ -6135,19 +6135,21 @@ static void ext4_mb_clear_bb(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
>> ext4_fsblk_t block, unsigned long count,
>> int flags)
>> {
>> - struct buffer_head *bitmap_bh = NULL;
>> + struct ext4_mark_context mc = {
>> + .handle = handle,
>> + .sb = inode->i_sb,
>> + .state = 0,
>> + };
>> struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
>> - struct ext4_group_desc *gdp;
>> struct ext4_group_info *grp;
>> unsigned int overflow;
>> ext4_grpblk_t bit;
>> - struct buffer_head *gd_bh;
>> ext4_group_t block_group;
>> struct ext4_sb_info *sbi;
>> struct ext4_buddy e4b;
>> unsigned int count_clusters;
>> int err = 0;
>> - int ret;
>> + int mark_flags = 0;
>>
>> sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
>>
>> @@ -6179,18 +6181,6 @@ static void ext4_mb_clear_bb(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
>> /* The range changed so it's no longer validated */
>> flags &= ~EXT4_FREE_BLOCKS_VALIDATED;
>> }
>> - count_clusters = EXT4_NUM_B2C(sbi, count);
>> - bitmap_bh = ext4_read_block_bitmap(sb, block_group);
>> - if (IS_ERR(bitmap_bh)) {
>> - err = PTR_ERR(bitmap_bh);
>> - bitmap_bh = NULL;
>> - goto error_return;
>> - }
>> - gdp = ext4_get_group_desc(sb, block_group, &gd_bh);
>> - if (!gdp) {
>> - err = -EIO;
>> - goto error_return;
>> - }
>>
>> if (!(flags & EXT4_FREE_BLOCKS_VALIDATED) &&
>> !ext4_inode_block_valid(inode, block, count)) {
>> @@ -6200,28 +6190,7 @@ static void ext4_mb_clear_bb(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
>> goto error_return;
>> }
>>
>> - BUFFER_TRACE(bitmap_bh, "getting write access");
>> - err = ext4_journal_get_write_access(handle, sb, bitmap_bh,
>> - EXT4_JTR_NONE);
>> - if (err)
>> - goto error_return;
>> -
>> - /*
>> - * We are about to modify some metadata. Call the journal APIs
>> - * to unshare ->b_data if a currently-committing transaction is
>> - * using it
>> - */
>> - BUFFER_TRACE(gd_bh, "get_write_access");
>> - err = ext4_journal_get_write_access(handle, sb, gd_bh, EXT4_JTR_NONE);
>> - if (err)
>> - goto error_return;
>> -#ifdef AGGRESSIVE_CHECK
>> - {
>> - int i;
>> - for (i = 0; i < count_clusters; i++)
>> - BUG_ON(!mb_test_bit(bit + i, bitmap_bh->b_data));
>> - }
>> -#endif
>> + count_clusters = EXT4_NUM_B2C(sbi, count);
>> trace_ext4_mballoc_free(sb, inode, block_group, bit, count_clusters);
>>
>> /* __GFP_NOFAIL: retry infinitely, ignore TIF_MEMDIE and memcg limit. */
>> @@ -6230,6 +6199,22 @@ static void ext4_mb_clear_bb(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
>> if (err)
>> goto error_return;
>>
>> +#ifdef AGGRESSIVE_CHECK
>> + mark_flags |= EXT4_MB_BITMAP_MARKED_CHECK;
>> +#endif
>> + err = ext4_mb_mark_group_bb(&mc, block_group, bit, count_clusters,
>> + mark_flags);
>> +
>> +
>> + if (err && mc.changed == 0) {
>> + ext4_mb_unload_buddy(&e4b);
>> + goto error_return;
>> + }
>> +
>> +#ifdef AGGRESSIVE_CHECK
>> + BUG_ON(mc.changed != count_clusters);
>> +#endif
>> +
>> /*
>> * We need to make sure we don't reuse the freed block until after the
>> * transaction is committed. We make an exception if the inode is to be
>> @@ -6252,13 +6237,8 @@ static void ext4_mb_clear_bb(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
>> new_entry->efd_tid = handle->h_transaction->t_tid;
>>
>> ext4_lock_group(sb, block_group);
>> - mb_clear_bits(bitmap_bh->b_data, bit, count_clusters);
>> ext4_mb_free_metadata(handle, &e4b, new_entry);
>> } else {
>> - /* need to update group_info->bb_free and bitmap
>> - * with group lock held. generate_buddy look at
>> - * them with group lock_held
>> - */
>> if (test_opt(sb, DISCARD)) {
>> err = ext4_issue_discard(sb, block_group, bit,
>> count_clusters, NULL);
>> @@ -6271,23 +6251,11 @@ static void ext4_mb_clear_bb(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
>> EXT4_MB_GRP_CLEAR_TRIMMED(e4b.bd_info);
>>
>> ext4_lock_group(sb, block_group);
>> - mb_clear_bits(bitmap_bh->b_data, bit, count_clusters);
>> mb_free_blocks(inode, &e4b, bit, count_clusters);
>> }
>>
>> - ret = ext4_free_group_clusters(sb, gdp) + count_clusters;
>> - ext4_free_group_clusters_set(sb, gdp, ret);
>> - ext4_block_bitmap_csum_set(sb, gdp, bitmap_bh);
>> - ext4_group_desc_csum_set(sb, block_group, gdp);
>> ext4_unlock_group(sb, block_group);
>>
>> - if (sbi->s_log_groups_per_flex) {
>> - ext4_group_t flex_group = ext4_flex_group(sbi, block_group);
>> - atomic64_add(count_clusters,
>> - &sbi_array_rcu_deref(sbi, s_flex_groups,
>> - flex_group)->free_clusters);
>> - }
>> -
>> /*
>> * on a bigalloc file system, defer the s_freeclusters_counter
>> * update to the caller (ext4_remove_space and friends) so they
>> @@ -6302,26 +6270,14 @@ static void ext4_mb_clear_bb(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
>>
>> ext4_mb_unload_buddy(&e4b);
>>
>> - /* We dirtied the bitmap block */
>> - BUFFER_TRACE(bitmap_bh, "dirtied bitmap block");
>> - err = ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(handle, NULL, bitmap_bh);
>> -
>> - /* And the group descriptor block */
>> - BUFFER_TRACE(gd_bh, "dirtied group descriptor block");
>> - ret = ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(handle, NULL, gd_bh);
>> - if (!err)
>> - err = ret;
>> -
>> if (overflow && !err) {
>> block += count;
>> count = overflow;
>> - put_bh(bitmap_bh);
>> /* The range changed so it's no longer validated */
>> flags &= ~EXT4_FREE_BLOCKS_VALIDATED;
>> goto do_more;
>> }
>> error_return:
>> - brelse(bitmap_bh);
>> ext4_std_error(sb, err);
>> return;
>> }
>> --
>> 2.30.0
>>
>
--
Best wishes
Kemeng Shi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-06 14:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-03 15:03 [PATCH v4 00/19] Fixes, cleanups and unit test for mballoc Kemeng Shi
2023-06-03 15:03 ` [PATCH v4 01/19] ext4: fix wrong unit use in ext4_mb_normalize_request Kemeng Shi
2023-06-03 15:03 ` [PATCH v4 02/19] ext4: fix unit mismatch in ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple Kemeng Shi
2023-06-03 15:03 ` [PATCH v4 03/19] ext4: fix wrong unit use in ext4_mb_find_by_goal Kemeng Shi
2023-06-03 15:03 ` [PATCH v4 04/19] ext4: treat stripe in block unit Kemeng Shi
2023-06-03 15:03 ` [PATCH v4 05/19] ext4: add EXT4_MB_HINT_GOAL_ONLY test in ext4_mb_use_preallocated Kemeng Shi
2023-06-03 15:03 ` [PATCH v4 06/19] ext4: remove ext4_block_group and ext4_block_group_offset declaration Kemeng Shi
2023-06-03 15:03 ` [PATCH v4 07/19] ext4: try all groups in ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple Kemeng Shi
2023-06-03 15:03 ` [PATCH v4 08/19] ext4: get block from bh before pass it to ext4_free_blocks_simple in ext4_free_blocks Kemeng Shi
2023-06-03 15:03 ` [PATCH v4 09/19] ext4: remove unsed parameter and unnecessary forward declaration of ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple Kemeng Shi
2023-06-03 15:03 ` [PATCH v4 10/19] ext4: fix wrong unit use in ext4_mb_clear_bb Kemeng Shi
2023-06-03 15:03 ` [PATCH v4 11/19] ext4: fix wrong unit use in ext4_mb_new_blocks Kemeng Shi
2023-06-03 15:03 ` [PATCH v4 12/19] ext4: factor out codes to update block bitmap and group descriptor on disk from ext4_mb_mark_bb Kemeng Shi
2023-06-03 15:03 ` [PATCH v4 13/19] ext4: call ext4_mb_mark_group_bb in ext4_free_blocks_simple Kemeng Shi
2023-06-11 5:05 ` Theodore Ts'o
2023-06-12 2:24 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-06-12 3:49 ` Theodore Ts'o
2023-06-13 1:22 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-06-20 1:50 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-06-03 15:03 ` [PATCH v4 14/19] ext4: extent ext4_mb_mark_group_bb to support allocation under journal Kemeng Shi
2023-06-03 15:03 ` [PATCH v4 15/19] ext4: call ext4_mb_mark_group_bb in ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used Kemeng Shi
2023-06-03 15:03 ` [PATCH v4 16/19] ext4: call ext4_mb_mark_group_bb in ext4_mb_clear_bb Kemeng Shi
2023-06-06 9:39 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-06-06 14:16 ` Kemeng Shi [this message]
2023-06-08 6:16 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-06-03 15:03 ` [PATCH v4 17/19] ext4: call ext4_mb_mark_group_bb in ext4_group_add_blocks Kemeng Shi
2023-06-03 15:03 ` [PATCH v4 18/19] ext4: add some kunit stub for mballoc kunit test Kemeng Shi
2023-06-03 15:03 ` [PATCH v4 19/19] ext4: add first unit test for ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple in mballoc Kemeng Shi
2023-06-09 3:14 ` [PATCH v4 00/19] Fixes, cleanups and unit test for mballoc Theodore Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bb19c6f8-d31f-f686-17f9-3fd2bb1db3dd@huaweicloud.com \
--to=shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).