Linux-ext4 Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Nico Pache <npache@redhat.com>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
	brendanhiggins@google.com, davidgow@google.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	rafael@kernel.org, linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org,
	geert@linux-m68k.org, mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com,
	davem@davemloft.net, broonie@kernel.org,
	skhan@linuxfoundation.org, mptcp@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] kunit: Fix formatting of KUNIT tests to meet the standard
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 16:39:07 -0400
Message-ID: <dbe6abeb-0082-e309-1208-9c43c6f127ae@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YHyK+5xJEMcDDhVy@mit.edu>

On 4/18/21 3:39 PM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 04:58:03AM -0400, Nico Pache wrote:
>> There are few instances of KUNIT tests that are not properly defined.
>> This commit focuses on correcting these issues to match the standard
>> defined in the Documentation.
> The word "standard" seems to be over-stating things.  The
> documentation currently states, "they _usually_ have config options
> ending in ``_KUNIT_TEST'' (emphasis mine).  I can imagine that there
> might be some useful things we can do from a tooling perspective if we
> do standardize things, but if you really want to make it a "standard",
> we should first update the manpage to say so, 

KUNIT Maintainers, should we go ahead and make this the "standard"?

As Ted has stated...  consistency with 'grep' is my desired outcome.

> and explain why (e.g.,
> so that we can easily extract out all of the kunit test modules, and
> perhaps paint a vision of what tools might be able to do with such a
> standard).
>
> Alternatively, the word "standard" could perhaps be changed to
> "convention", which I think more accurately defines how things work at
> the moment.Nico Pache (6):
>   kunit: ASoC: topology: adhear to KUNIT formatting standard
>   kunit: software node: adhear to KUNIT formatting standard
>   kunit: ext4: adhear to KUNIT formatting standard
>   kunit: lib: adhear to KUNIT formatting standard
>   kunit: mptcp: adhear to KUNIT formatting standard
>   m68k: update configs to match the proper KUNIT syntax
>
> Also, "adhear" is not the correct spelling; the correct spelling is
> "adhere" (from the Latin verb "adhaerere", "to stick", as in "to hold
> fast or stick by as if by gluing", which then became "to bind oneself
> to the observance of a set of rules or standards or practices").
>
>        		       	      	       		 - Ted

Whoops... Made that mistake in my v1 and inadvertently copied it over

to all the patches.


Cheers!

-- Nico


  reply index

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-14  8:58 Nico Pache
2021-04-14  8:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] kunit: ASoC: topology: adhear to KUNIT formatting standard Nico Pache
2021-04-14 14:20   ` Mark Brown
2021-04-14  8:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] kunit: software node: " Nico Pache
2021-04-14  8:58 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] kunit: ext4: " Nico Pache
2021-04-18 19:41   ` Theodore Ts'o
2021-04-14  8:58 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] kunit: lib: " Nico Pache
2021-04-14  8:58 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] kunit: mptcp: " Nico Pache
2021-04-14  9:25   ` Matthieu Baerts
2021-04-15  6:01     ` David Gow
2021-04-15  7:10       ` Matthieu Baerts
2021-04-17  4:24         ` David Gow
2021-04-17  8:02           ` Matthieu Baerts
2021-04-19  7:40           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-04-14  8:58 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] m68k: update configs to match the proper KUNIT syntax Nico Pache
2021-04-14 16:06 ` (subset) [PATCH v2 0/6] kunit: Fix formatting of KUNIT tests to meet the standard Mark Brown
2021-04-18 19:39 ` Theodore Ts'o
2021-04-22 20:39   ` Nico Pache [this message]
2021-04-23  6:26     ` David Gow

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dbe6abeb-0082-e309-1208-9c43c6f127ae@redhat.com \
    --to=npache@redhat.com \
    --cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=davidgow@google.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux-ext4 Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/0 linux-ext4/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-ext4 linux-ext4/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4 \
		linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index linux-ext4

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-ext4


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git