From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.thelounge.net (mail.thelounge.net [91.118.73.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40BFE3E499 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 10:48:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.118.73.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708512537; cv=none; b=bEHWsSuyb152O5J4/cke1YRgpZXw9vWgVHiDcHxOn81LVACYIBqXxjJLxEZrXIcWusUz0529nEEgVliYYPxZ/fAcQNMUD8Y84VXkmsxAtxDZRoXytKWPTMKEmJAa+yG4wSCPfu7wftqx7nEpp0iCEf46+InPu94ly73OS6S7byg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708512537; c=relaxed/simple; bh=KTNa76qeRoFVlee6jb3crd51E2DS7DDRwJSQNj1bdYM=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=dHybSoV2np/Lj0Hl73clQYV7UmWhMneqLKQrdqIWtHEQARPQ+KCl98EeihzyjEm7ucHCwHI2mYfmgL7XlyWNGgSTSoV0WUhBTntzE8mHnOS4cMHwquQv9UlZTMCSVM8kntumScX4TwvcqI11ZKTWknOlwn7EXCQ3Dx5D6JnWi84= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=thelounge.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=thelounge.net; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.118.73.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=thelounge.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=thelounge.net Received: from [10.10.10.2] (rh.vpn.thelounge.net [10.10.10.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: h.reindl@thelounge.net) by mail.thelounge.net (THELOUNGE MTA) with ESMTPSA id 4Tft0X2dylzXXh for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 11:33:32 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 11:33:32 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Why isn't ext2 deprecated over ext4? Content-Language: en-US To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org References: From: Reindl Harald Autocrypt: addr=h.reindl@thelounge.net; keydata= xsDNBFq9ahEBDADEQKxJxY4WUy7Ukg6JbzwAUI+VQYpnRuFKLIvcU+2x8zzf8cLaPUiNhJKN 3fD8fhCc2+nEcSVwLDMoVZfsg3BKM/uE/d2XNb3K4s13g3ggSYW9PCeOrbcRwuIvK5gsUqbj vXSAOcrR7gz/zD6wTYSNnaj+VO4gsoeCzBkjy9RQlHBfW+bkW3coDCK7DocqmSRTNRYrkZNR P1HJBUvK3YOSawbeEa8+l7EbHiW+sdlc79qi8dkHavn/OqiNJQErQQaS9FGR7pA5SvMvG5Wq 22I8Ny00RPhUOMbcNTOIGUY/ZP8KPm5mPfa9TxrJXavpGL2S1DE/q5t4iJb4GfsEMVCNCw9E 6TaW7x6t1885YF/IZITaOzrROfxapsi/as+aXrJDuUq09yBCimg19mXurnjiYlJmI6B0x7S9 wjCGP+aZqhqW9ghirM82U/CVeBQx7afi29y6bogjl6eBP7Z3ZNmwRBC3H23FcoloJMXokUm3 p2DiTcs2XViKlks6Co/TqFEAEQEAAc0mUmVpbmRsIEhhcmFsZCA8aC5yZWluZGxAdGhlbG91 bmdlLm5ldD7CwREEEwEIADsCGyMFCwkIBwIGFQoJCAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AWIQSdK0bNvBQK NnU65NczF01aWJK3uAUCWr1qowIZAQAKCRAzF01aWJK3uEznDACGncwi0KfKOltOBmzIQNIn 7kPOBFU8KGIjONpg/5r82zwDEpFOTKw+hCttokV6+9K+j8Iut0u9o7iSQNA70cXqkaqPndxB uRIi/L6nm2ZlUMvQj9QD5U+mdTtSQH5WrC5lo2RYT2sTWoAFQ6CSnxxJd9Ud7rjbDy7GRnwv IRMfFJZtTf6HAKj8dZecwnBaHqgZQgRAhdsUtH8ejDsWlfxW1Qp3+Vq008OE3XXOFQX5qXWK MESOnTtGMq1mU/Pesmyp0+z58l6HyUmcoWruyAmjX7yGQPOT5APg2LFpMHA6LIu40mbb/pfg 5am8LWLBXQRCP1D/XLOuQ5DO6mWY0rtQ8ztZ5Wihi5qA9QKcJxmZcdmurlaxi3mavR3VgCIc 3hDPcvUqBwB5boNZspowYoHQ21g9qyFHOyeS69SNYhsHPCTr6+mSyn+p4ou4JTKiDRR16q5X hHfXO9Ao9zvVVhuw+P4YySmTRRlgJtcneniH8CBbr9PsjzhVcX2RkOCC+ObOwM0EWr1qEQEM ANIkbSUr1zk5kE8aXQgt4NFRfkngeDLrvxEgaiTZp93oSkd7mYDVBE3bA4g4tng2WPQL+vnb 371eaROa+C7/6CNYJorBx79l+J5qZGXiW56btJEIER0R5yuxIZ9CH+qyO1X47z8chbHHuWrZ bTyq4eDrF7dTnEKIHFH9wF15yfKuiSuUg4I2Gdk9eg4vv9Eyy/RypBPDrjoQmfsKJjKN81Hy AP6hP9hXL4Wd68VBFBpFCb+5diP+CKo+3xSZr4YUNr3AKFt/19j2jJ8LWqt0Gyf87rUIzAN8 TgLKITW8kH8J1hiy/ofOyMH1AgBJNky1YHPZU3z1FWgqeTCwlCiPd6cQfuTXrIFP1dHciLpj 8haE7f2d4mIHPEFcUXTL0R6J1G++7/EDxDArUJ9oUYygVLQ0/LnCPWMwh7xst8ER994l9li3 PA9k9zZ3OYmcmB7iqIB+R7Z8gLbqjS+JMeyqKuWzU5tvV9H3LbOw86r2IRJp3J7XxaXigJJY 7HoOBA8NwQARAQABwsD2BBgBCAAgFiEEnStGzbwUCjZ1OuTXMxdNWliSt7gFAlq9ahECGwwA CgkQMxdNWliSt7hVMwwAmzm7mHYGuChRV3hbI3fjzH+S6+QtiAH0uPrApvTozu8u72pcuvJW J4qyK5V/0gsFS8pwdC9dfF8FGMDbHprs6wK0rMqaDawAL8xWKvmyi6ZLsjVScA6aM307CEVr v5FJiibO+te+FkzaO9+axEjloSQ9DbJHbE3Sh7tLhpBmDQVBCzfSV7zQtsy9L3mDKJf7rW+z hqO9JA885DHHsVPPhA9mNgfRvzQJn/3fFFzqmRVf7mgBV8Wn8aepEUGAd2HzVAb3f1+TS04P +RI8qKoqeVdZlbwJD59XUDJrnetQrBEfhEd8naW8mHyEWHVJZnSTUIfPz2sneW1Zu2XkfqwV eW+IyDAcYyTXqnEGdFSEgwgzliPJDWm5CHbsU++7Kzar5d5flRgGbtcxqkpl8j0N0BUlN4fA cTqn2HJNlhMSV0ZocQ0888Zaq2S5totXr7yuiDzwrp70m9bJY+VPDjaUtWruf2Yiez3EAhtU K4rYsjPimkSIVdrNM//wVKdCTbO+ Organization: the lounge interactive design In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Am 21.02.24 um 10:33 schrieb Michael Opdenacker: > Greetings > > I'm wondering why ext2 isn't marked as deprecated yet as it has 32 bit > dates and dates will rollover in 2038 (in 14 years from now!). > > I'm asking because ext4, when used without a journal, seems to be a > worthy replacement and has 64 bit dates. > > I'll be happy to send a patch to fs/ext2/Kconfig to warn users. even ext4 on very small filesystems has 32 bit days at least in 2019 a fresh 50 MB filesystem welcomed me at first mount that it will only last until 2038 - i don't find the mail in my archives but the response on the kernel-list was "add these and that params" after i asked if someone is kidding me