From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
To: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
axboe@kernel.dk, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, ming.lei@redhat.com,
osandov@fb.com, jthumshirn@suse.de, minwoo.im.dev@gmail.com,
damien.lemoal@wdc.com, andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com,
hare@suse.com, tj@kernel.org, ajay.joshi@wdc.com,
sagi@grimberg.me, dsterba@suse.com, chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com,
bvanassche@acm.org, dhowells@redhat.com, asml.silence@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/3] block: Add support for REQ_OP_ASSIGN_RANGE operation
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 17:37:47 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yq1a77oc56s.fsf@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3f2e341b-dea4-c5d0-8eb0-568b6ad2f17b@virtuozzo.com> (Kirill Tkhai's message of "Thu, 19 Dec 2019 14:07:16 +0300")
Kirill,
> Hm. BLKDEV_ZERO_NOUNMAP is used in __blkdev_issue_write_zeroes() only.
> So, do I understand right that we should the below two?:
>
> 1) Introduce a new flag BLKDEV_ZERO_ALLOCATE for
> blkdev_issue_write_zeroes().
> 2) Introduce a new flag REQ_NOZERO in enum req_opf.
Something like that. If zeroing is a problem for you.
Right now we offer the following semantics:
Deallocate, no zeroing (discard)
Optionally deallocate, zeroing (zeroout)
Allocate, zeroing (zeroout + NOUNMAP)
Some devices also implement a fourth option which would be:
Anchor: Allocate, no zeroing
> Won't this confuse a reader that we have blkdev_issue_write_zeroes(),
> which does not write zeroes sometimes? Maybe we should rename
> blkdev_issue_write_zeroes() in some more generic name?
Maybe. The naming is what it is for hysterical raisins and reflects how
things are implemented in the storage protocols. I wouldn't worry too
much about that. We can rename things if need be but we shouldn't plumb
an essentially identical operation through the block stack just to
expose a different name at the top.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-19 22:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-10 16:56 [PATCH RFC 0/3] block,ext4: Introduce REQ_OP_ASSIGN_RANGE to reflect extents allocation in block device internals Kirill Tkhai
2019-12-10 16:56 ` [PATCH RFC 1/3] block: Add support for REQ_OP_ASSIGN_RANGE operation Kirill Tkhai
2019-12-19 3:03 ` Martin K. Petersen
2019-12-19 11:07 ` Kirill Tkhai
2019-12-19 22:03 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-12-19 22:37 ` Martin K. Petersen [this message]
2019-12-20 1:53 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-12-20 2:22 ` Martin K. Petersen
2019-12-20 11:55 ` Kirill Tkhai
2019-12-21 18:54 ` Martin K. Petersen
2019-12-23 8:51 ` Kirill Tkhai
2020-01-07 3:24 ` Martin K. Petersen
2020-01-07 13:59 ` Kirill Tkhai
2020-01-08 2:49 ` Martin K. Petersen
2020-01-09 9:43 ` Kirill Tkhai
2019-12-10 16:56 ` [PATCH RFC 2/3] loop: Forward REQ_OP_ASSIGN_RANGE into fallocate(0) Kirill Tkhai
2019-12-10 16:56 ` [PATCH RFC 3/3] ext4: Notify block device about fallocate(0)-assigned blocks Kirill Tkhai
2019-12-11 12:55 ` [PATCH RFC v2 " Kirill Tkhai
2019-12-11 7:42 ` [PATCH RFC 0/3] block,ext4: Introduce REQ_OP_ASSIGN_RANGE to reflect extents allocation in block device internals Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-12-11 8:50 ` Kirill Tkhai
2019-12-17 14:16 ` Kirill Tkhai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yq1a77oc56s.fsf@oracle.com \
--to=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=ajay.joshi@wdc.com \
--cc=andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com \
--cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com \
--cc=damien.lemoal@wdc.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=jthumshirn@suse.de \
--cc=ktkhai@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=minwoo.im.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=osandov@fb.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).