From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3F10C4CEC7 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 01:16:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABA9820665; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 01:16:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.b="m5NPZBVE"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.b="lI2n0py3" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org ABA9820665 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i9fcV-00038S-Ta; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 01:15:59 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i9fcU-00038K-Vz for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 01:15:58 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:CC:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=N+ZNmX0/7uNFNhMLVA1exUGOaKkJhK2NGfxQt0eDsV8=; b=m5NPZBVEdgutWDi5NW/iklLAX+ 6jv1ijArOQTMSeKe1dPlczg1tZXX59Vc2ky1doooHOgZAHbiX5BTvlVyUBz5S7iqk1Ja6FsvSzhSU v/D/hMiZrQYRyIum40Yqr5jrXrNBsf9xadbNT1h7BVkpg+8e04lH9tx1aHnNX/ZhXVzc=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:References:CC:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=N+ZNmX0/7uNFNhMLVA1exUGOaKkJhK2NGfxQt0eDsV8=; b=lI2n0py3vnwiAq4eqfJh50FtWS aExiHnM1p82pmZZ413AbYkJjhCweuVGeeXxQAGrf5fXAg216BdnmFrMslzPYceXJsJ1LeZrvOwav0 8aMcKG06Y5B7W9MbIsg/NyIzgqFBkJFGaFRAcW60nZcmyatjUymXUMyrLx/QVd71vEpc=; Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190] helo=huawei.com) by sfi-mx-3.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) id 1i9fcQ-007259-RH for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 01:15:58 +0000 Received: from DGGEMS409-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id B9426788CD4FFC694493; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 09:15:47 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.134.22.195] (10.134.22.195) by smtp.huawei.com (10.3.19.209) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 09:15:45 +0800 To: Jaegeuk Kim References: <20190909080108.GC21625@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> <20190909082112.GA25724@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> <2f5b844c-f722-6a80-a4ab-61bdd72b8be4@huawei.com> <20190909083844.GC25724@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> <83759349-644a-b3a0-787d-e463b0565885@huawei.com> <20190909143419.GB31108@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> <20190910115850.GA98080@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> <2fd8940b-9ebd-d143-5ce6-c056750c596f@huawei.com> <20190910120913.GB98080@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> From: Chao Yu Message-ID: <1ba048b4-7dac-1c98-837d-0f0456ccc560@huawei.com> Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 09:15:35 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190910120913.GB98080@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> Content-Language: en-US X-Originating-IP: [10.134.22.195] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Headers-End: 1i9fcQ-007259-RH Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: avoid infinite GC loop due to stale atomic files X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On 2019/9/10 20:09, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: >> The lock is used to protect F2FS_I(inode)->inmem_pages list... it should be kept? > Urg.. yup. I added. Reviewed-by: Chao Yu Thanks, > _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel