From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0450C32756 for ; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 10:53:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 822B72086D for ; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 10:53:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.b="bee7qFDY"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.b="H9o+SvMO" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 822B72086D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1hw2WY-0007Oq-6x; Fri, 09 Aug 2019 10:53:30 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1hw2WV-0007O9-Ma for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 09 Aug 2019 10:53:27 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:CC:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=w7H6Tmq3lOw8ksg9YOlwmwETE3jGtOtQv7H+RxZB5xo=; b=bee7qFDYt8u/1oTq0zQxrGj7lO omB8Rx+Id8N6NjQl0VpSwyct7wm3MTjqETdxBiuRpx+ODya7LcYdIib3O9jo/8byP3vdOr5SjNfmN J/+4/TM9lT9MGf1PmtMBHTnZXiYvEr67A+spjrEbMWCaNYwRMrArenLQdy+DG9zLI5fU=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject: CC:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=w7H6Tmq3lOw8ksg9YOlwmwETE3jGtOtQv7H+RxZB5xo=; b=H9o+SvMOAxG6WSGfPmi9HaV4oi LZwbq7aEJnJ/QUFPy9iEQK/KHY1XAbfgVLVz6XtKDsA4oihn86SlcGkxwUzIQQvWeLqkOu/W3VBkb AXwWJ9jA7j9bxLonb7HUz61WjzvbF0tSTq1eN2n5vWSA7G0HL+0Sz6YbJZWGnAarfMNo=; Received: from szxga06-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.32] helo=huawei.com) by sfi-mx-1.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) id 1hw2WT-00HEew-Mz for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 09 Aug 2019 10:53:27 +0000 Received: from DGGEMS405-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id BB29DC058791E39F234A; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 18:53:18 +0800 (CST) Received: from szvp000203569.huawei.com (10.120.216.130) by DGGEMS405-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.205) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.439.0; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 18:53:11 +0800 From: Chao Yu To: Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2019 18:52:54 +0800 Message-ID: <20190809105302.79876-2-yuchao0@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.18.0.rc1 In-Reply-To: <20190809105302.79876-1-yuchao0@huawei.com> References: <20190809105302.79876-1-yuchao0@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.120.216.130] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Headers-End: 1hw2WT-00HEew-Mz Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 02/10] f2fs-tools: fix to avoid memory leak of sit_i->sentries X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net We missed to free sit_i->sentries in f2fs_do_umount(), fix it. Signed-off-by: Chao Yu --- fsck/mount.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/fsck/mount.c b/fsck/mount.c index f97c4ea..af7149e 100644 --- a/fsck/mount.c +++ b/fsck/mount.c @@ -2917,6 +2917,7 @@ void f2fs_do_umount(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi) free(sit_i->sentries[i].cur_valid_map); free(sit_i->sit_bitmap); + free(sit_i->sentries); free(sm_i->sit_info); /* free sm_info */ -- 2.18.0.rc1 _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel