From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNWANTED_LANGUAGE_BODY,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72518C3A59F for ; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 09:54:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4101021874 for ; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 09:54:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.b="b7d4ThvF"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.b="cZlko+e4" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4101021874 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i405O-0007hD-I7; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 09:54:22 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i405M-0007gX-WB for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 09:54:21 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject: CC:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=f8YKC6iaayecafkPjQNtkQwYqsu1G0MNUenaft6l9Qc=; b=b7d4ThvF819lwToyuSy/GxlRMF +lxM3BDxClYhWoWuyuT3dflRhF673gTmFhwacRkAEdTAojLqSkDKheEM8lYGLluV6j3k168INTCm6 WCxnn5LXWC72/KCBms13DZQ6uL7fGl4IAeMaUz3pubNHaGA+Tp3oSkug8HY4/4Rok67o=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject:CC:To:From:Sender: Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date :Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To: References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post: List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=f8YKC6iaayecafkPjQNtkQwYqsu1G0MNUenaft6l9Qc=; b=c Zlko+e4mWwrvgGenis0mlEZsvVX7rNb9snMAOpzHPMfpwm1f7EDSoNvhYlLQikNGPyapxseHXr9vP 6dNAErtpvYcTcG8AUFwqRm2mziwPJQA5Cgw1iSg0i80WRcOpi2b4MGD5H5ttHoAMaXifT98jTy585 RohWEwEwoPjoBzZE=; Received: from szxga06-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.32] helo=huawei.com) by sfi-mx-1.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) id 1i405L-00AMCl-2R for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 09:54:20 +0000 Received: from DGGEMS413-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 330BE740C11891972CF3; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 17:54:12 +0800 (CST) Received: from szvp000203569.huawei.com (10.120.216.130) by DGGEMS413-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.213) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.439.0; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 17:54:05 +0800 From: Chao Yu To: Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2019 17:54:00 +0800 Message-ID: <20190831095401.8142-1-yuchao0@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.18.0.rc1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.120.216.130] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Headers-End: 1i405L-00AMCl-2R Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] f2fs: introduce get_available_block_count() for cleanup X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net There are very similar codes in inc_valid_block_count() and inc_valid_node_count() which is used for available user block count calculation. This patch introduces a new helper get_available_block_count() to include those common codes, and used it instead for cleanup. Signed-off-by: Chao Yu --- v2: - fix panic during recovery fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h index a89ad8cab821..9c010e6cba5c 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h @@ -1756,6 +1756,27 @@ static inline bool __allow_reserved_blocks(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, return false; } +static inline unsigned int get_available_block_count(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, + struct inode *inode, bool cap) +{ + block_t avail_user_block_count; + + avail_user_block_count = sbi->user_block_count - + sbi->current_reserved_blocks; + + if (!__allow_reserved_blocks(sbi, inode, cap)) + avail_user_block_count -= F2FS_OPTION(sbi).root_reserved_blocks; + + if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_CP_DISABLED))) { + if (avail_user_block_count > sbi->unusable_block_count) + avail_user_block_count -= sbi->unusable_block_count; + else + avail_user_block_count = 0; + } + + return avail_user_block_count; +} + static inline void f2fs_i_blocks_write(struct inode *, block_t, bool, bool); static inline int inc_valid_block_count(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct inode *inode, blkcnt_t *count) @@ -1782,17 +1803,8 @@ static inline int inc_valid_block_count(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, spin_lock(&sbi->stat_lock); sbi->total_valid_block_count += (block_t)(*count); - avail_user_block_count = sbi->user_block_count - - sbi->current_reserved_blocks; + avail_user_block_count = get_available_block_count(sbi, inode, true); - if (!__allow_reserved_blocks(sbi, inode, true)) - avail_user_block_count -= F2FS_OPTION(sbi).root_reserved_blocks; - if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_CP_DISABLED))) { - if (avail_user_block_count > sbi->unusable_block_count) - avail_user_block_count -= sbi->unusable_block_count; - else - avail_user_block_count = 0; - } if (unlikely(sbi->total_valid_block_count > avail_user_block_count)) { diff = sbi->total_valid_block_count - avail_user_block_count; if (diff > *count) @@ -2005,7 +2017,8 @@ static inline int inc_valid_node_count(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct inode *inode, bool is_inode) { block_t valid_block_count; - unsigned int valid_node_count, user_block_count; + unsigned int valid_node_count; + unsigned int avail_user_block_count; int err; if (is_inode) { @@ -2027,16 +2040,10 @@ static inline int inc_valid_node_count(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, spin_lock(&sbi->stat_lock); - valid_block_count = sbi->total_valid_block_count + - sbi->current_reserved_blocks + 1; - - if (!__allow_reserved_blocks(sbi, inode, false)) - valid_block_count += F2FS_OPTION(sbi).root_reserved_blocks; - user_block_count = sbi->user_block_count; - if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_CP_DISABLED))) - user_block_count -= sbi->unusable_block_count; + valid_block_count = sbi->total_valid_block_count + 1; + avail_user_block_count = get_available_block_count(sbi, inode, false); - if (unlikely(valid_block_count > user_block_count)) { + if (unlikely(valid_block_count > avail_user_block_count)) { spin_unlock(&sbi->stat_lock); goto enospc; } -- 2.18.0.rc1 _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel