linux-f2fs-devel.lists.sourceforge.net archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2] loop: avoid EAGAIN, if offset or block_size are changed
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 09:59:13 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191125175913.GC71634@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1e1aae74-bd6b-dddb-0c88-660aac33872c@acm.org>

On 11/19, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 5/17/19 5:53 PM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > This patch tries to avoid EAGAIN due to nrpages!=0 that was originally trying
> > to drop stale pages resulting in wrong data access.
> > 
> > Report: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=938958#c38
> 
> Please provide a more detailed commit description. What is wrong with the
> current implementation and why is the new behavior considered the correct
> behavior?

Some history would be:

Original bug fix is:
commit 5db470e229e2 ("loop: drop caches if offset or block_size are changed"),
which returns EAGAIN so that user land like Chrome would require enhancing their
error handling routines.

So, this patch tries to avoid EAGAIN while addressing the original bug.

> 
> This patch moves draining code from before the following comment to after
> that comment:
> 
> /* I/O need to be drained during transfer transition */
> 
> Is that comment still correct or should it perhaps be updated?

IMHO, it's still valid.

> 
> Thanks,
> 

> Bart.


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-25 17:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-18  0:47 [PATCH] loop: avoid EAGAIN, if offset or block_size are changed Jaegeuk Kim
2019-05-18  0:53 ` [PATCH v2] " Jaegeuk Kim
2019-06-17 21:08   ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim
2019-11-18 18:36     ` [f2fs-dev] " Andrew Norrie
2019-11-19  4:00       ` Greg KH
2019-11-19 23:40   ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2] " Bart Van Assche
2019-11-25 17:59     ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2019-11-25 18:35       ` Bart Van Assche
2019-11-25 19:22         ` Jaegeuk Kim
2019-11-25 19:41           ` Bart Van Assche
2019-11-27 18:18   ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3] " Jaegeuk Kim
2019-11-27 18:54     ` Bart Van Assche
2020-02-19 19:58       ` Andrew Norrie
2020-03-05 21:04 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] " Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191125175913.GC71634@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com \
    --to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).