linux-f2fs-devel.lists.sourceforge.net archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com>,
	Javier Gonzalez <javier@javigon.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
	<linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: Fix direct IO handling
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2019 02:34:55 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191128023447.wopisf4nh2l63evv@shindev.dhcp.fujisawa.hgst.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191126234428.GB20652@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com>

On Nov 26, 2019 / 15:44, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 11/26, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> > f2fs_preallocate_blocks() identifies direct IOs using the IOCB_DIRECT
> > flag for a kiocb structure. However, the file system direct IO handler
> > function f2fs_direct_IO() may have decided that a direct IO has to be
> > exececuted as a buffered IO using the function f2fs_force_buffered_io().
> > This is the case for instance for volumes including zoned block device
> > and for unaligned write IOs with LFS mode enabled.
> > 
> > These 2 different methods of identifying direct IOs can result in
> > inconsistencies generating stale data access for direct reads after a
> > direct IO write that is treated as a buffered write. Fix this
> > inconsistency by combining the IOCB_DIRECT flag test with the result
> > of f2fs_force_buffered_io().
> > 
> > Reported-by: Javier Gonzalez <javier@javigon.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>
> > ---
> >  fs/f2fs/data.c | 4 +++-
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > index 5755e897a5f0..8ac2d3b70022 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > @@ -1073,6 +1073,8 @@ int f2fs_preallocate_blocks(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
> >  	int flag;
> >  	int err = 0;
> >  	bool direct_io = iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_DIRECT;
> > +	bool do_direct_io = direct_io &&
> > +		!f2fs_force_buffered_io(inode, iocb, from);
> >  
> >  	/* convert inline data for Direct I/O*/
> >  	if (direct_io) {
> > @@ -1081,7 +1083,7 @@ int f2fs_preallocate_blocks(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
> >  			return err;
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	if (direct_io && allow_outplace_dio(inode, iocb, from))
> > +	if (do_direct_io && allow_outplace_dio(inode, iocb, from))
> 
> It seems f2fs_force_buffered_io() includes allow_outplace_dio().
> 
> How about this?

Thanks. I confirmed that the issue is gone with your patch.

Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>

> ---
>  fs/f2fs/data.c | 13 -------------
>  fs/f2fs/file.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> index a034cd0ce021..fc40a72f7827 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> @@ -1180,19 +1180,6 @@ int f2fs_preallocate_blocks(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
>  	int err = 0;
>  	bool direct_io = iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_DIRECT;
>  
> -	/* convert inline data for Direct I/O*/
> -	if (direct_io) {
> -		err = f2fs_convert_inline_inode(inode);
> -		if (err)
> -			return err;
> -	}
> -
> -	if (direct_io && allow_outplace_dio(inode, iocb, from))
> -		return 0;
> -
> -	if (is_inode_flag_set(inode, FI_NO_PREALLOC))
> -		return 0;
> -
>  	map.m_lblk = F2FS_BLK_ALIGN(iocb->ki_pos);
>  	map.m_len = F2FS_BYTES_TO_BLK(iocb->ki_pos + iov_iter_count(from));
>  	if (map.m_len > map.m_lblk)
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> index c0560d62dbee..6b32ac6c3382 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> @@ -3386,18 +3386,33 @@ static ssize_t f2fs_file_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
>  				ret = -EAGAIN;
>  				goto out;
>  			}
> -		} else {
> -			preallocated = true;
> -			target_size = iocb->ki_pos + iov_iter_count(from);
> +			goto write;
> +		}
>  
> -			err = f2fs_preallocate_blocks(iocb, from);
> -			if (err) {
> -				clear_inode_flag(inode, FI_NO_PREALLOC);
> -				inode_unlock(inode);
> -				ret = err;
> -				goto out;
> -			}
> +		if (is_inode_flag_set(inode, FI_NO_PREALLOC))
> +			goto write;
> +
> +		if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_DIRECT) {
> +			/* convert inline data for Direct I/O*/
> +			err = f2fs_convert_inline_inode(inode);
> +			if (err)
> +				goto out_err;
> +
> +			if (!f2fs_force_buffered_io(inode, iocb, from))
> +				goto write;
> +		}
> +		preallocated = true;
> +		target_size = iocb->ki_pos + iov_iter_count(from);
> +
> +		err = f2fs_preallocate_blocks(iocb, from);
> +		if (err) {
> +out_err:
> +			clear_inode_flag(inode, FI_NO_PREALLOC);
> +			inode_unlock(inode);
> +			ret = err;
> +			goto out;
>  		}
> +write:
>  		ret = __generic_file_write_iter(iocb, from);
>  		clear_inode_flag(inode, FI_NO_PREALLOC);
>  
> -- 
> 2.19.0.605.g01d371f741-goog
> 

--
Best Regards,
Shin'ichiro Kawasaki

_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-28  2:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-26  7:57 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: Fix direct IO handling Damien Le Moal
2019-11-26  8:34 ` Ritesh Harjani
2019-11-28  2:10   ` Damien Le Moal
2019-11-28 10:20     ` Ritesh Harjani
2019-11-30  7:27       ` Chao Yu
2019-11-30  7:19     ` Chao Yu
2019-11-26 16:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-26 23:44 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2019-11-28  2:34   ` Shinichiro Kawasaki [this message]
2019-11-29  3:35   ` Javier Gonzalez
2019-11-30  6:43   ` Chao Yu
2019-12-03 17:33   ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2] " Jaegeuk Kim
2019-12-04  1:27     ` Chao Yu
2019-12-04  4:01     ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2019-12-04  8:16     ` Javier Gonzalez

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191128023447.wopisf4nh2l63evv@shindev.dhcp.fujisawa.hgst.com \
    --to=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
    --cc=Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=javier@javigon.com \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).