linux-f2fs-devel.lists.sourceforge.net archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2] f2fs: Make f2fs_readpages readable again
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 19:08:45 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200205030845.GP8731@bombadil.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bd08bf56-f901-33b1-5151-f77fd823e343@huawei.com>

On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 09:58:29AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2020/2/3 11:39, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > 
> > Remove the horrendous ifdeffery by slipping an IS_ENABLED into
> > f2fs_compressed_file().
> 
> I'd like to suggest to use
> 
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_F2FS_FS_COMPRESSION) && f2fs_compressed_file(inode))
> 
> here to clean up f2fs_readpages' codes.
> 
> Otherwise, f2fs module w/o compression support will not recognize compressed
> file in most other cases if we add IS_ENABLED() condition into
> f2fs_compressed_file().

If we need to recognise them in order to deny access to them, then I
suppose we need two predicates.  Perhaps:

	f2fs_unsupported_attributes(inode)
and
	f2fs_compressed_file(inode)

where f2fs_unsupported_attributes can NACK any set flag (including those
which don't exist yet), eg encrypted.  That seems like a larger change
than I should be making, since I'm not really familiar with f2fs code.


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-05  3:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-01 15:08 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: Make f2fs_readpages readable again Matthew Wilcox
2020-02-03  3:39 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2] " Matthew Wilcox
2020-02-05  1:58   ` Chao Yu
2020-02-05  3:08     ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2020-02-06  6:29       ` Chao Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200205030845.GP8731@bombadil.infradead.org \
    --to=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yuchao0@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).